Validity and Reliability of the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale

被引：0

作者：

Yagci Senturk, Aysun ^{[1
]}

Kas Ozdemir, Atiye ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Trabzon Univ, Tonya Vocat Sch Higher Educ, Dept Hlth Care Serv, Kaleonu St, TR-61500 Trabzon, Turkiye

[2] Pamukkale Univ, Saraykoy Vocat Sch, Dept Therapy & Rehabil, Denizli, Turkiye

来源：

OMEGA-JOURNAL OF DEATH AND DYING | 2024年

关键词：

end-of-life care; elderly; palliative care; reliability; terminal care; HEALTH;

D O I：

10.1177/00302228241239712

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Tools to measure layout people's knowledge about palliative care are very limited. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS) in Turkish on layout people other than healthcare professionals. Perception of Health Scale (PHS) and European Health Literacy Survey (EHLS) scales were used to ensure concurrent validity of PaCKS. Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was found to be .846. In item analysis, item-total score correlations were found to be between .343 and .691. Intraclass correlation coefficient of PaCKS total score was found to be .862, p < .001 in test-retest results. In the concurrent validity analysis, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the PaCKS and the PHS (r = .504, p = .000) and PaCKS and the EHLS (r = .251, p = .017). PaCKS is a simple, applicable and short test that can be easily understood by layout people without any health education.

引用

页数：12

共 50 条

[31] Development and validation of the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS)
Kozlov, Elissa
Carpenter, Brian D.
Rodebaugh, Thomas L.
PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2017, 15 (05) : 524 - 534
[32] Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the ECT Perception and Knowledge Scale
Yildirim, Yusuf Ezel
Aydin, Pinar Cetinay
Ozturk, Nalan
NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2023, 60 (01): : 55 - 61
[33] Validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change of the "Osteoporosis and You" knowledge scale
Nguyen, V. T.
Edmonds, S. W.
Lou, Y.
Roblin, D. W.
Saag, K. G.
Cram, P.
Wolinsky, F. D.
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 28 (12) : 3379 - 3388
[34] Validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change of the “Osteoporosis and You” knowledge scale
V. T. Nguyen
S. W. Edmonds
Y. Lou
D. W. Roblin
K. G. Saag
P. Cram
F. D. Wolinsky
Osteoporosis International, 2017, 28 : 3379 - 3388
[35] Validity and reliability study of the Cardiff Fertility Knowledge Scale in Turkish
Odabas, Resmiye Kaya
Ergin, Ayla
Birinci, Figen Baskan
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2024, 50 (04) : 719 - 727
[36] A reliability and validity study of the McMaster quality of life scale (MQLS) for a palliative population
Sterkenburg, CA
King, B
Woodward, CA
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 1996, 12 (01) : 18 - 25
[37] Validity and reliability of the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS) in Korea: a multicenter study of terminally ill cancer patients
So-Jung Park
Yujin Park
Mira Han
Sun-Hyun Kim
In Cheol Hwang
Go-un Woo
Yoo Jeong Lee
Young Sung Kim
Hyun Jung Jho
Yoon Jung Chang
BMC Palliative Care, 23 (1)
[38] Validity and reliability of the Palliative Care Transition Measure for Caregivers (PCTM-C)
D'Angelo, Daniela
Mastroianni, Chiara
Artico, Marco
Biagioli, Valentina
Latina, Roberto
Guarda, Michela
Piredda, Michela
De Marinis, Maria Grazia
PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2019, 17 (02) : 202 - 207
[39] Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a New Pediatric Palliative Care Needs Assessment Tool
Michelson, Kelly
Downing, Kimberly
Rudnik, Margaret
Cloen, Jason
Donnelly, James
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 51 (02) : 322 - 323
[40] The German version of the Individualized Care Scale - assessing validity and reliability
Koeberich, Stefan
Suhonen, Riitta
Feuchtinger, Johanna
Farin, Erik
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2015, 9 : 483 - 494

← 1 2 3 4 5 →