Cost per Patient Achieving Treatment Targets and Number Needed to Treat with Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide 1 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States

被引:0
|
作者
Mody, Reema R. [1 ]
Meyer, Kellie L. [2 ]
Ward, Jennifer M. [3 ]
O'Day, Ken B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Value Evidence & Outcomes, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[2] AmerisourceBergen, Evidence Generat & Value Commun, Conshohocken, PA USA
[3] Eli Lilly & Co, Value Evidence & Outcomes, Diabet & Obes, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] AmerisourceBergen, Evidence Synth & Modeling, Conshohocken, PA USA
关键词
Cost; Cost-effectiveness; Cost per responder; Number needed to treat; Diabetes mellitus; type; 2; Semaglutide; Tirzepatide; United States; HEALTH-CARE; COMPLICATIONS; LIRAGLUTIDE; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-023-01470-w
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Achieving glycemic control can help reduce complications of type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study compared the pharmacy cost per responder and number needed to treat (NNT) of tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg versus semaglutide 1 mg to achieve glycemic, weight loss, and composite treatment endpoints in patients with T2D in the United States.Methods: The proportions of patients achieving glycemic, weight loss, and composite treatment endpoints were obtained from the phase 3 SURPASS-2 randomized clinical trial which compared tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg to semaglutide 1 mg. Annual pharmacy costs were calculated using 2022 wholesale acquisition costs. Cost per responder and NNT were calculated along with 95% confidence intervals and tests for statistical significance (P <= 0.05).Results: Tirzepatide had a lower cost per responder to achieve glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) endpoints of <= 6.5% (10 mg and 15 mg doses) and < 5.7% (all doses) and weight loss endpoints of >= 5% (10 mg and 15 mg doses), >= 10% (all doses), and >= 15% (all doses). The cost per responder to achieve HbA1c < 7% (all doses of tirzepatide) and <= 6.5% (5 mg tirzepatide) were not statistically significantly different between tirzepatide and semaglutide 1 mg. The cost per patient to achieve the composite endpoints (HbA1c < 7.0%, <= 6.5%, or < 5.7%/weight loss >= 10%/no hypoglycemia) was statistically significantly lower for all doses of tirzepatide than for semaglutide 1 mg. The NNTs for all doses of tirzepatide were statistically significantly lower than that for semaglutide 1 mg to achieve all individual and composite endpoints, with the exception of the 5 mg dose for HbA1c < 7.0% and HbA1c <= 6.5%, where tirzepatide had numerically lower NNTs that were not statistically significant.Conclusion: Tirzepatide is a novel glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (RA) that may offer the potential to achieve stringent glycemic goals, weight loss targets, and composite treatment goals at a lower cost per responder compared to semaglutide 1 mg among people with T2D.
引用
收藏
页码:2045 / 2055
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条