Clinical Outcome of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Yuchao [1 ]
Wu, Zheng [1 ]
Wang, Shaoping [1 ]
Liu, Tong [1 ]
Liu, Jinghua [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Ctr Coronary Artery Dis, Beijing Inst Heart Lung & Blood Vessel Dis, 2 Anzhen Rd, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Percutaneous coronary intervention; In-stent restenosis; Chronic total occlusion; Paclitaxel-coated balloon; Drug-eluting stent; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; BARE-METAL; PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTION; POOLED ANALYSIS; RESTENOSIS; MULTICENTER; INSIGHTS; REGISTRY; DEFINITIONS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s10557-022-07363-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims In-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO) represents a unique challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention. Whether the optimal treatment for IS-CTO is angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) or repeat stenting with drug-eluting stents (DESs) is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of PCB angioplasty and DES repeat stenting for DES IS-CTO. Methods We retrospectively included patients with DES IS-CTO who underwent successful PCB angioplasty or DES repeat stenting from January 2016 to December 2019. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Cox proportional hazards model was performed to compare the risk of MACEs between PCB angioplasty and DES repeat stenting, and to further explore the prognostic factors of patients with DES IS-CTO. Results A total of 214 patients with DES IS-CTO were enrolled: 78 patients (36.4%) treated with PCB and 136 patients (63.6%) treated with DES respectively. The median follow-up was 1160 days, and MACEs were observed in 28.2% of patients with PCB angioplasty versus 26.5% of patients with DES repeat stenting (P = 0.784), mainly driven by TLR (21.8% vs. 19.9%, P = 0.735). There was no significant difference in the risk of MACEs between the PCB group and the DES group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-2.46, P = 0.512). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that chronic kidney disease and >= 3 stent layers in the lesion were independent predictors of MACEs, while switching to another antiproliferative drug was an independent protective factor (all P < 0.05). Conclusions PCB angioplasty was an effective alternative treatment strategy for DES IS-CTO, which had similar long-term outcomes to DES repeat stenting in contemporary practice, but both were accompanied by a high rate of long-term MACEs. Improving the poor prognosis of patients with DES IS-CTO remains a challenge.
引用
收藏
页码:1155 / 1166
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of 7-Year, Real-World Clinical Outcomes between Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients with Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis
    Kim, Minsu
    Jang, Albert Youngwoo
    Lee, Joonpyo
    Seo, Jeongduk
    Shin, Yong Hoon
    Oh, Pyung Chun
    Suh, Soon Yong
    Lee, Kyounghoon
    Kang, Woong Chol
    Han, Seung-Hwan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (13)
  • [22] Efficacy of drug-eluting balloon versus sirolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of in-stent restenosis
    Cui, Konyong
    Lyu, Shuzheng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (16) : C112 - C112
  • [23] One Case of Using Drug-eluting Balloon to Treat Drug-eluting Stent In-stent Restenosis
    Qiang, Lyu
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (16) : S227 - S228
  • [24] Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis
    Almalla, Mohammad
    Schroeder, Joerg
    Pross, Verena
    Marx, Nikolaus
    Hoffmann, Rainer
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 83 (06) : 881 - 887
  • [25] Different Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Balloon Angioplasty Between Early and Late In-Stent Restenosis After Drug-Eluting Stent
    Jung, Haewon
    Hong, Sung-Jin
    Ahn, Chul-Min
    Kim, Jung-Sun
    Kim, Byeong-Keuk
    Hong, Myeong-Ki
    Jang, Yangsoo
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [26] Comparison of drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in patients with drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: Insight from randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Wenhao
    Wang, Shaohua
    Xu, Chengzhang
    Zhang, Haifeng
    Lin, Yongqing
    Chen, Yangxin
    Wang, Jingfeng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (16) : C116 - C116
  • [27] Cost-Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients With Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis
    Dorenkamp, Marc
    Boldt, Julia
    Leber, Alexander W.
    Sohns, Christian
    Roser, Mattias
    Boldt, Leif-Hendrik
    Haverkamp, Wilhelm
    Bonaventura, Klaus
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (07) : 407 - 413
  • [28] Drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent implantation in ACS patients with different angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis
    Xie, Haifang
    Qiu, Miaohan
    Li, Xinyan
    Xiao, Yao
    Mu, Yanyan
    Wang, Geng
    Han, Yaling
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 415
  • [29] Paclitaxel-coated balloons: a safe alternative to drug-eluting stents for coronary in-stent restenosis
    Lansky, Alexandra
    Grubman, Daniel
    Scheller, Bruno
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (38) : 3729 - 3731
  • [30] DRUG-COATED BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY VERSUS DRUG-ELUTING STENT IMPLANTATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF BARE-METAL AND DRUG-ELUTING STENT RESTENOSIS: RESULTS FROM THE DAEDALUS STUDY
    Giacoppo, D.
    Alfonso, F.
    Kastrati, A.
    Byrne, R. A.
    HEART, 2020, 106 : A11 - A11