Revision of fluoroquinolone breakpoints used for interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of canine bacterial isolates

被引:3
|
作者
Papich, Mark G. [1 ]
Gunnett, Lacie A. [2 ]
V. Lubbers, Brian [3 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Zoetis, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Manhattan, KS USA
关键词
antibiotic; enrofloxacin; marbofloxacin; dogs; susceptibility testing; METABOLITE CIPROFLOXACIN; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-PSEUDINTERMEDIUS; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; ENROFLOXACIN; PHARMACOKINETICS; MARBOFLOXACIN; DOGS; EUROPE; COMBINATION; DIFLOXACIN;
D O I
10.2460/ajvr.23.07.0159
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents, enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin, were US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved in the United States for use in dogs in 1988 and 1999, respectively. There have been many advances since then concerning the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) evaluation of fluoroquinolones, and there are data available on the susceptibility of targeted pathogens since the original approval. Using this information, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Veterinary Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee (VAST) revised its antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints. The previous breakpoints (used in older editions of CLSI standards) for enrofloxacin in dogs were susceptible (S), <= 0.5 kig/mL, intermediate (I) 1-2 kig/mL, and resistant (R) >= 4 kig/mL. The new breakpoints are S <= 0.06 kig/mL for a dose of 5 mg/kg, 0.12 kig/mL for a dose of 10 mg/kg, 0.25 kig/mL for a high dose of 20 mg/kg, and R >= 0.5 kig/mL. The breakpoints of 0.12 and 0.25 kig/mL represent a new susceptible-dose dependent (SDD) category. For marbofloxacin, previous breakpoints were S, <= 1 kig/mL, I 2 kig/mL, and R >= 4 kig/mL. The new breakpoints are S <= 0.12 kig/mL for a dose of 2.8 mg/kg, 0.25 kig/mL for a dose of 5.5 mg/kg (SDD), and R >= 0.5 kig/mL. The new breakpoints will be published in the next edition of CLSI-Vet01(S) and deviate considerably from the prior breakpoints. Laboratories are encouraged to revise their testing standards. These changes will likely reduce the unnecessary use of these fluoroquinolones in dogs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of Reappraisal of Fluoroquinolone Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Susceptibility Breakpoints in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Isolates
    Shealy, Stephanie C.
    Brigmon, Matthew M.
    Justo, Julie Ann
    Bookstaver, P. Brandon
    Kohn, Joseph
    Al-Hasan, Majdi N.
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2020, 9 (04):
  • [22] Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility interpretation among Enterobacteriaceae using CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints
    Swathi, Suravaram
    Vivek, Hada
    Siddiqui, Imran Ahmed
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 39 (03) : 315 - 319
  • [23] Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial agents of canine pyometra
    Robaj, Avni
    Sylejmani, Driton
    Hamidi, Afrim
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2018, 52 (03) : 397 - 400
  • [24] Aerobic bacterial isolates in equids and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern
    Biruhtesfa, A.
    Yilikal, A.
    Bojia, E.
    Ayele, G.
    Getachew, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2007, 5 (03): : 107 - 112
  • [25] Metabolism-Triggered Plasmonic Nanosensor for Bacterial Detection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates
    Zhang, Jing
    Wang, Mengna
    Xiao, Jinru
    Wang, Mengqi
    Liu, Yaqing
    Gao, Xia
    ACS SENSORS, 2024, 9 (01) : 379 - 387
  • [26] Antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints and first-step parC mutations in Streptococcus pneumoniae:: Redefining fluoroquinolone resistance
    Lim, S
    Bast, D
    McGeer, A
    de Azavedo, J
    Low, DE
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 9 (07) : 833 - 837
  • [27] Polymyxin Susceptibility Testing and Interpretive Breakpoints: Recommendations from the United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (USCAST)
    Pogue, Jason M.
    Jones, Ronald N.
    Bradley, John S.
    Andes, David R.
    Bhavnani, Sujata M.
    Drusano, George L.
    Dudley, Michael N.
    Flamm, Robert K.
    Rodvold, Keith A.
    Ambrose, Paul G.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 64 (02)
  • [28] Nanophotonics for bacterial detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing
    Pitruzzello, Giampaolo
    Conteduca, Donato
    Krauss, Thomas F.
    NANOPHOTONICS, 2020, 9 (15) : 4447 - 4472
  • [29] Assessment of the Phoenix™ automated system and EUCAST breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing against isolates expressing clinically relevant resistance mechanisms
    Giani, T.
    Morosini, M. I.
    D'Andrea, M. M.
    Garcia-Castillo, M.
    Rossolini, G. M.
    Canton, R.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2012, 18 (11) : E452 - E458
  • [30] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for feline urinary tract isolates
    Papich, Mark G.
    JOURNAL OF FELINE MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2016, 18 (02) : 183 - 184