Revision of fluoroquinolone breakpoints used for interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of canine bacterial isolates

被引:3
|
作者
Papich, Mark G. [1 ]
Gunnett, Lacie A. [2 ]
V. Lubbers, Brian [3 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Zoetis, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Manhattan, KS USA
关键词
antibiotic; enrofloxacin; marbofloxacin; dogs; susceptibility testing; METABOLITE CIPROFLOXACIN; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-PSEUDINTERMEDIUS; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; ENROFLOXACIN; PHARMACOKINETICS; MARBOFLOXACIN; DOGS; EUROPE; COMBINATION; DIFLOXACIN;
D O I
10.2460/ajvr.23.07.0159
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents, enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin, were US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved in the United States for use in dogs in 1988 and 1999, respectively. There have been many advances since then concerning the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) evaluation of fluoroquinolones, and there are data available on the susceptibility of targeted pathogens since the original approval. Using this information, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Veterinary Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee (VAST) revised its antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints. The previous breakpoints (used in older editions of CLSI standards) for enrofloxacin in dogs were susceptible (S), <= 0.5 kig/mL, intermediate (I) 1-2 kig/mL, and resistant (R) >= 4 kig/mL. The new breakpoints are S <= 0.06 kig/mL for a dose of 5 mg/kg, 0.12 kig/mL for a dose of 10 mg/kg, 0.25 kig/mL for a high dose of 20 mg/kg, and R >= 0.5 kig/mL. The breakpoints of 0.12 and 0.25 kig/mL represent a new susceptible-dose dependent (SDD) category. For marbofloxacin, previous breakpoints were S, <= 1 kig/mL, I 2 kig/mL, and R >= 4 kig/mL. The new breakpoints are S <= 0.12 kig/mL for a dose of 2.8 mg/kg, 0.25 kig/mL for a dose of 5.5 mg/kg (SDD), and R >= 0.5 kig/mL. The new breakpoints will be published in the next edition of CLSI-Vet01(S) and deviate considerably from the prior breakpoints. Laboratories are encouraged to revise their testing standards. These changes will likely reduce the unnecessary use of these fluoroquinolones in dogs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Challenges in antimicrobial susceptibility testing interpretation: Fluoroquinolone susceptibility discordance
    Jones, Nathan
    Shah, Punit J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2022, 79 (11) : 829 - 830
  • [2] Aerobic bacterial isolates and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents in canine osteomyelitis
    Simionato, AC
    Ramos, MCC
    Coutinho, SDA
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2003, 55 (02) : 148 - 154
  • [3] Antimicrobial susceptibility of 6 antimicrobial agents in Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates by using EUCAST breakpoints compared with previously used breakpoints
    Alarcon, Teresa
    Urruzuno, Pedro
    Josefa Martinez, Maria
    Domingo, Diego
    Llorca, Laura
    Correa, Ana
    Lopez-Brea, Manuel
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2017, 35 (05): : 278 - 282
  • [4] Antimicrobial susceptibility of pneumococcal isolates causing bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia: analysis using current breakpoints and fluoroquinolone pharmacodynamics
    Feldman, C.
    Brink, A. J.
    von Gottberg, A.
    Wolter, N.
    de Gouveia, L.
    Perovic, O.
    Klugman, K. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2010, 36 (01) : 95 - 97
  • [5] Susceptibility testing of tulathromycin: Interpretative breakpoints and susceptibility of field isolates
    Godinho, K. S.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 129 (3-4) : 426 - 432
  • [6] Fluoroquinolone Treatment and Susceptibility of Isolates From Bacterial Keratitis
    Ray, Kathryn J.
    Prajna, Lalitha
    Srinivasan, Muthiah
    Geetha, Manoharan
    Karpagam, Rajarathinam
    Glidden, David
    Oldenburg, Catherine E.
    Sun, Catherine Q.
    McLeod, Stephen D.
    Acharya, Nisha R.
    Lietman, Thomas M.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 131 (03) : 310 - 313
  • [7] Interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Breakpoints: Analysis of Agreement
    Gaur, Priyanka
    Hada, Vivek
    Rath, Rama S.
    Mohanty, Aroop
    Singh, Parul
    Rukadikar, Atul
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [8] In vitro susceptibility of 4903 bacterial isolates to gemifloxacin - an advanced fluoroquinolone
    Blondeau, JM
    Hansen, G
    Metzler, KL
    Borsos, S
    Irvine, LB
    Blanco, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2003, 22 (02) : 147 - 154
  • [9] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints and methods from BSAC to EUCAST
    Brown, Derek F. J.
    Wootton, Mandy
    Howe, Robin A.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 71 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [10] Challenging a dogma: antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints for Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    Angeby, Kristian
    Jureen, Pontus
    Kahlmeter, Gunnar
    Hoffner, Sven E.
    Schon, Thomas
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2012, 90 (09) : 693 - 698