Patients' opinions on participation in patient-centered outcomes research in community pharmacies: A qualitative study

被引:2
|
作者
Carroll, Joni C. [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Cindy [3 ,4 ]
Mook, Hailey [4 ,5 ]
McGivney, Melissa A. Somma [2 ]
Coley, Kim C.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pharm & Therapeut, Salk Hall,Rm 5408,3501 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pharm & Therapeut, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Penn Hosp, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Amer Pharmacists Assoc, Custom Educ, Washington, DC USA
关键词
CLINICAL-TRIALS; PERCEPTIONS; ENGAGEMENT; OPPORTUNITY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.japh.2022.09.001
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) often brings patient voices, thoughts, and opinions into the research process, allowing patients to have a say in the research process from project inception to dissemination of results. Community pharmacy teams are well-situated to engage patients in their own health and in research, given their trusting relationships with patients and access in communities. Objective: To gather patients' opinions on participation in PCOR at their local community pharmacy. Methods: Four regional focus groups representing western, central, northeastern, and southeastern Pennsylvania were conducted. A single community pharmacy in each region recruited patients to participate in each focus group. A focus group discussion guide was developed and reviewed by a Stakeholder Advisory Board that consisted patients, pharmacists, and researchers. Questions focused on patients' relationships with their pharmacy and pharmacist, perceptions of research occurring at their local pharmacy, and patient engagement methods. Focus group sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and independently coded by 2 investigators. Coding discrepancies were reconciled through discussion, and a qualitative inductive thematic analysis was conducted by the research team. Results: A total of 44 patients participated in one of 4 focus groups. Patients provided insights into what would make them more likely to participate in PCOR at their local community pharmacy. Four themes emerged from the discussions: (1) Understanding the impact to one's health or community affects participation; (2) Patients prefer to schedule research activities at times outside of prescription pick-up or drop-off; (3) Trusted relationships can be leveraged for recruitment; and (4) Face-to-face engagement is preferred for participant recruitment. Conclusion: Patients want to engage in research in a way that is respectful of their time and matters to them. Strong patient-pharmacist relationships are essential for patient engagement in and acceptance of PCOR opportunities in community pharmacies. Community pharmacies may be rich locations to engage patients in PCOR. (c) 2022 American Pharmacists Association((R)). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 187
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-centered outcomes
    Keenan, SP
    Carlet, J
    Curtis, R
    Pinsky, M
    Rubenfeld, G
    Vincent, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2002, 17 (04) : 221 - 234
  • [32] CREATING MEANINGFUL AND EFFECTIVE PARTNERSHIPS IN PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH: THE PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INTSITUTE'S FOUNDATIONAL EXPECTATIONS FOR RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS
    Crescioni, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S347 - S347
  • [33] Educational Needs and Preferences for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in the Cystic Fibrosis Community: Mixed Methods Study
    Godfrey, Emily M.
    Kazmerski, Traci M.
    Brown, Georgia
    Thayer, Erin K.
    Mentch, Laura
    Pam, Molly
    Al Achkar, Morhaf
    [J]. JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (03)
  • [34] The impact of patients' participation on physicians' patient-centered communication
    Cegala, Donald J.
    Post, Douglas M.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2009, 77 (02) : 202 - 208
  • [35] Economic Outcomes in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research A Paradigm Shift
    Smith, Scott R.
    Evans, Emily L.
    Brown, Derek S.
    Reynolds, Kerry A.
    Timbie, Justin W.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2023, 61 (12) : S89 - S91
  • [36] The Role of The Patient in Promoting Patient-Centered Outcomes Research FOREWORD
    Klag, Michael J.
    MacKenzie, Ellen J.
    Carswell, Christopher I.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2008, 1 (01): : 1 - 3
  • [37] Patient-centered outcomes research and the injured patient: a summary of application
    Godat, Laura N.
    Jensen, Aaron R.
    Stein, Deborah M.
    [J]. TRAUMA SURGERY & ACUTE CARE OPEN, 2020, 5 (01)
  • [38] Avenues for Strengthening PCORnet's Capacity to Advance Patient-Centered Economic Outcomes in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR)
    Waitman, Lemuel R.
    Bailey, Leonard Charles
    Becich, Michael J.
    Chung-Bridges, Katherine
    Dusetzina, Stacie B.
    Espino, Jessi U.
    Hogan, William R.
    Kaushal, Rainu
    Mcclay, James C.
    Merritt, James Greg
    Rothman, Russell L.
    Shenkman, Elizabeth A.
    Song, Xing
    Nauman, Elizabeth
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2023, 61 (12) : S153 - S160
  • [39] Training patients to review scientific reports for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: an observational study
    Ivlev, Ilya
    Vander Ley, Kelly J.
    Wiedrick, Jack
    Lesley, Kira
    Forester, Amy
    Webb, Rebekah
    Broitman, Marina
    Eden, Karen B.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (09):
  • [40] The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Research Done Differently
    Newhouse, Robin
    Barksdale, Debra J.
    Miller, Julie Ann
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 64 (01) : 72 - 77