Patients' opinions on participation in patient-centered outcomes research in community pharmacies: A qualitative study

被引:2
|
作者
Carroll, Joni C. [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Cindy [3 ,4 ]
Mook, Hailey [4 ,5 ]
McGivney, Melissa A. Somma [2 ]
Coley, Kim C.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pharm & Therapeut, Salk Hall,Rm 5408,3501 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pharm & Therapeut, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Penn Hosp, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Amer Pharmacists Assoc, Custom Educ, Washington, DC USA
关键词
CLINICAL-TRIALS; PERCEPTIONS; ENGAGEMENT; OPPORTUNITY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.japh.2022.09.001
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) often brings patient voices, thoughts, and opinions into the research process, allowing patients to have a say in the research process from project inception to dissemination of results. Community pharmacy teams are well-situated to engage patients in their own health and in research, given their trusting relationships with patients and access in communities. Objective: To gather patients' opinions on participation in PCOR at their local community pharmacy. Methods: Four regional focus groups representing western, central, northeastern, and southeastern Pennsylvania were conducted. A single community pharmacy in each region recruited patients to participate in each focus group. A focus group discussion guide was developed and reviewed by a Stakeholder Advisory Board that consisted patients, pharmacists, and researchers. Questions focused on patients' relationships with their pharmacy and pharmacist, perceptions of research occurring at their local pharmacy, and patient engagement methods. Focus group sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and independently coded by 2 investigators. Coding discrepancies were reconciled through discussion, and a qualitative inductive thematic analysis was conducted by the research team. Results: A total of 44 patients participated in one of 4 focus groups. Patients provided insights into what would make them more likely to participate in PCOR at their local community pharmacy. Four themes emerged from the discussions: (1) Understanding the impact to one's health or community affects participation; (2) Patients prefer to schedule research activities at times outside of prescription pick-up or drop-off; (3) Trusted relationships can be leveraged for recruitment; and (4) Face-to-face engagement is preferred for participant recruitment. Conclusion: Patients want to engage in research in a way that is respectful of their time and matters to them. Strong patient-pharmacist relationships are essential for patient engagement in and acceptance of PCOR opportunities in community pharmacies. Community pharmacies may be rich locations to engage patients in PCOR. (c) 2022 American Pharmacists Association((R)). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 187
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Qualitative Methods in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
    Vandermause, Roxanne
    Barg, Frances K.
    Esmail, Laura
    Edmundson, Lauren
    Girard, Samantha
    Perfetti, A. Ross
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2017, 27 (03) : 434 - 442
  • [2] Understanding the Influence and Impact of Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-centered Outcomes Research: a Qualitative Study
    Maureen Maurer
    Rikki Mangrum
    Tandrea Hilliard-Boone
    Andrew Amolegbe
    Kristin L. Carman
    Laura Forsythe
    Rachel Mosbacher
    Julie Kennedy Lesch
    Krista Woodward
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2022, 37 : 6 - 13
  • [3] Understanding the Influence and Impact of Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-centered Outcomes Research: a Qualitative Study
    Maurer, Maureen
    Mangrum, Rikki
    Hilliard-Boone, Tandrea
    Amolegbe, Andrew
    Carman, Kristin L.
    Forsythe, Laura
    Mosbacher, Rachel
    Lesch, Julie Kennedy
    Woodward, Krista
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (SUPPL 1) : 6 - 13
  • [4] Development of patient-centered outcomes for labour and birth: a qualitative study
    Johnson, Geoffrey E.
    Kan, Lauren
    Nguyen, Jennifer
    Campbell, Kim
    Ralph, Laura
    Koenig, Nicole
    Sanaee, May
    Maher, Ciana
    Cundiff, Geoffrey W.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 49 (01):
  • [5] The Patient-centered Outcomes Research Institute's Role in Advancing Methods for Patient-centered Outcomes Research
    Fleurence, Rachael
    Whicher, Danielle
    Dunham, Kelly
    Gerson, Jason
    Newhouse, Robin
    Luce, Bryan
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2015, 53 (01) : 2 - 8
  • [6] Patient participation in research projects in Community Pharmacies: An exploratory study
    Fuentes-Senise, Carlos
    Ferreira Alfaya, Francisco Javier
    Senise-Gomez, Maria Elena
    Cura, Yasmin
    [J]. ARS PHARMACEUTICA, 2024, 65 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [7] Patient participation in research projects in Community Pharmacies: An exploratory study
    Fuentes-Senise, Carlos
    Ferreira Alfaya, Francisco Javier
    Elena Senise-Gomez, Maria
    Cura, Yasmin
    [J]. ARS PHARMACEUTICA, 2022, 63 (02) : 144 - 151
  • [8] Caregiver outcomes in patient-centered research
    Witsaman, Rachel
    McDuff, Ingrid
    Margolis, Mary Kay
    Frank, Lori
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 70 - 70
  • [9] Publishing Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
    不详
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2014, 12 (06) : 503 - 504
  • [10] Community engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: Benefits, barriers, and measurement
    Martinez, Linda Sprague
    Carolan, Kelsi
    O'Donnell, Arden
    Diaz, Yareliz
    Freeman, Elmer R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2018, 2 (06) : 371 - 376