Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage IIA/B Metastatic Seminoma: Results of the COlogne Trial of Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy In Metastatic Seminoma (COTRIMS)

被引:22
|
作者
Heidenreich, Axel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Paffenholz, Pia [1 ]
Hartmann, Florian [1 ]
Seelemeyer, Felix [1 ]
Pfister, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Urol Urooncol Robot Assisted & Specialized Ur, Cologne, Germany
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Cologne, Dept Urol Urooncol Robot Assisted & Specialized Ur, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词
Testis cancer; Germ cell tumor; Radiation therapy; Chemotherapy; Lymph node dissection; Relapse; miR371; TESTICULAR SEMINOMA; SURVIVAL; RISK; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Radiation therapy and systemic chemotherapy are recommended treatment options in marker-negative clinical stage (CS) IIA/B seminoma. Despite high cure rates of 82-94%, both therapeutic options are associated with significant long-term toxicities. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, oncological efficacy, and treatment-associated morbidity of primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) in CS IIA/B seminoma. Design, setting, and participants: A prospective, single-arm, clinical phase 2 trial including CS IIA/B seminoma patients was conducted. Intervention: Primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Relapse-free and overall survival, surgery-associated complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and Kaplan-Meier methods for survival calculation were assessed. Results and limitations: Thirty patients at a mean age of 39.1 (34-52) yr with marker-negative CS IIA and IIB seminomas were recruited. The median follow-up was 22 (8-30) mo. Nineteen (63%) and 11 (36%) patients were diagnosed with stages IIA and B, respectively, at the time of primary diagnosis. Fourteen (47%) and 16 (53%) patients were diagnosed with CS IIA and IIB, respectively, at the time of nsRPLND. Twenty-seven and three patients underwent open and robot-assisted nsRPLND, respectively. The median operating room time was 125 (115-145) min, median blood loss was <150 ml, and median time of hospitalization was 4.5 (3-9) d. Four (13%) patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade 3a complications. Lymph node histology revealed seminoma in 25 (80%) patients; two and three patients demonstrated embryonal carcinoma and benign disease, respectively. Sixteen patients underwent a serum analysis of miR371 preoperatively, which predicted metastatic disease in 12/13 and benign histology in 3/3 patients. Three of 30 (10%) patients developed an outfield relapse 4, 6, and 9 mo postoperatively and were salvaged by systemic chemotherapy. Limitations are the low patient number and length of follow-up. Conclusions: The nsRPLND approach results in a high cure rate at midterm follow-up and is associated with a low frequency of treatment-associated morbidities, making this approach a feasible alternative to radiation therapy or systemic chemotherapy. (c) 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 127
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OUTCOME OF VIABLE SEMINOMA AT POSTCHEMOTHERAPY RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH NODE DISSECTION
    Rice, Kevin
    Beck, Stephen
    Bihrle, Richard
    Lawrence, Einhorn
    Foster, Richard
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E271 - E271
  • [22] Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in stage II testicular seminoma: a systematic review
    Liu, Jianliang
    Hiwase, Mrunal
    Woon, Dixon T. S.
    Thomas, Benjamin
    Tran, Ben
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 135 (02) : 214 - 221
  • [23] Chemotherapy in advanced seminoma and the role of postcytostatic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection
    Hofmockel, G
    Gruss, A
    Theiss, M
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1996, 57 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [24] VALUE OF RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION IN ADVANCED TESTICULAR SEMINOMA
    KAMAT, MR
    KULKARNI, JN
    TONGAONKAR, HB
    RAVI, R
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 51 (01) : 65 - 67
  • [25] Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Stage II Seminoma: Is Surgery the New Path Forward?
    Tachibana, Isamu
    Alabd, Andre
    Tong, Yan
    Piroozi, Alex
    Mahmoud, Mohammad
    Kern, Sean Q.
    Masterson, Timothy A.
    Adra, Nabil
    Foster, Richard S.
    Hanna, Nasser H.
    Einhorn, Lawrence H.
    Cary, Clint
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (23) : 3930 - +
  • [26] Stadium IIA/B-seminoma testis: retroperitoneale lymfeklierdissectie als alternatief voor chemotherapie en radiotherapie?Stage IIA/B seminoma testis: retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as an alternative for chemotherapy and radiotherapy?
    Arnout R. Alberts
    Tahlita C. M. Zuiverloon
    Tijdschrift voor Urologie, 2023, 13 (6-7) : 136 - 142
  • [27] NERVE SPARING RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH NODEDISSECTION IN LOW VOLUME METASTATIC SEMINOMA
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Paffenholz, Pia
    Nestler, Tim
    Pfister, David
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E845 - E845
  • [28] Post-chemotherapy laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is feasible for stage IIA/B non-seminoma germ cell tumors
    Nakamura, Terukazu
    Kawauchi, Akihiro
    Oishi, Masakatsu
    Ueda, Takashi
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
    Kamoi, Kazumi
    Naya, Yoshio
    Hongo, Fumiya
    Okihara, Koji
    Miki, Tsuneharu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 21 (04) : 791 - 795
  • [29] RETROPERITONEAL NODAL DISTRIBUTION OF METASTATIC SEMINOMA: A CLINICAL MAPPING STUDY
    Zeng, Jiping
    McFadden, Jacob
    Masterson, Timothy A.
    Cary, Clint
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E7 - E8
  • [30] Post-chemotherapy laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is feasible for stage IIA/B non-seminoma germ cell tumors
    Terukazu Nakamura
    Akihiro Kawauchi
    Masakatsu Oishi
    Takashi Ueda
    Takumi Shiraishi
    Hiroyuki Nakanishi
    Kazumi Kamoi
    Yoshio Naya
    Fumiya Hongo
    Koji Okihara
    Tsuneharu Miki
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 21 : 791 - 795