Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Ning [1 ]
Chen, Linmu [2 ]
Liu, Lulu [3 ]
Rong, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Univ, Dept Pain Med, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0278846
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, and VIP databases, as well as dissertations and conference papers, to obtain randomized controlled trials comparing remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension before August 23, 2021. The primary outcomes included hemodynamic profiles, surgical field score, and blood loss. Extubation time, sedation and pain score at the PACU, and perioperative adverse events were the secondary outcomes. Nine randomized controlled trials with 543 patients (272 in the dexmedetomidine group and 271 in the remifentanil group) were eventually included. This meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in terms of surgical field score, blood loss, minimum values of mean arterial pressure (MD 0.24 with 95% CI [-1.65, 2.13], P = 0.80, I-2 = 66%) and heart rate (MD 0.42 [-1.33, 2.17], P = 0.64, I-2 = 40%), sedation scores at the PACU (MD -0.09 [-0.69, 0.50], P = 0.76, I-2 = 92%), and incidence of bradycardia (OR 2.24 [0.70, 7.15], P = 0.17, I-2 = 0%). Compared with remifentanil, dexmedetomidine as the controlled hypotensive agent showed a lower visual analogue score at the PACU (MD -1.01 [-1.25, -0.77], P<0.00001, I-2 = 0%) and incidence of shivering (OR 0.22 [0.08, 0.60], P = 0.003, I-2 = 0%), nausea, and vomiting (OR 0.34 [0.13, 0.89], P = 0.03, I-2 = 0%). However, extubation time was shorter in the remifentanil group (MD 3.34 [0.75, 5.93], P = 0.01, I-2 = 90%). In conclusion, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil are both effective in providing satisfactory controlled hypotension and surgical conditions. Dexmedetomidine is better in easing postoperative pain at the PACU and reducing the occurrence of shivering, nausea, and vomiting. Meanwhile, remifentanil is a fast-track anesthesia with a shorter extubation time. Given the limitations of this meta-analysis, further studies are needed for a more definitive comparison of the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Regional versus general anesthesia in older patients for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhou, Sheng-Liang
    Zhang, Shao-Yun
    Si, Hai-Bo
    Shen, Bin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [42] The efficacy and safety of remifentanil patient-controlled versus epidural analgesia in labor: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Lei, Xiuzhen
    Yu, Yang
    Li, Mei
    Fang, Peng
    Gan, Shuyuan
    Yao, Yongxing
    Zhou, Yanfeng
    Kang, Xianhui
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [43] Remifentanil patient-controlled versus epidural analgesia on intrapartum maternal fever: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guolin Lu
    Wenshui Yao
    Xiaofen Chen
    Sujing Zhang
    Min Zhou
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20
  • [44] Remifentanil patient-controlled versus epidural analgesia on intrapartum maternal fever: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lu, Guolin
    Yao, Wenshui
    Chen, Xiaofen
    Zhang, Sujing
    Zhou, Min
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [45] The Facilitatory Effects of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on the Duration of Spinal Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abdallah, Faraj W.
    Abrishami, Amir
    Brull, Richard
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 117 (01): : 271 - 278
  • [46] Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil infusion for controlled hypotension in shoulder arthroscopy: a comparative study
    Menshawi, Mohammed Abdelsalam
    Fahim, Hany Magdy
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [47] Relationship between Surgery under General Anesthesia and the Development of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Je Jin
    Choi, Geun Joo
    Kang, Hyun
    Baek, Chong Wha
    Jung, Yong Hun
    Shin, Hwa Yong
    Park, Yong Hee
    Woo, Young Cheol
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
  • [48] Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Premedication in Balanced Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Dogs
    Pan, Shi-Yue
    Liu, Gang
    Lin, Jia-Hao
    Jin, Yi-Peng
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [49] The preventive effect of dexmedetomidine on anesthesia complications in strabismus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yiren Chen
    Mingjie Li
    Yajing Zheng
    Ailuan Chen
    Chengjie Li
    BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [50] The preventive effect of dexmedetomidine on anesthesia complications in strabismus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Yiren
    Li, Mingjie
    Zheng, Yajing
    Chen, Ailuan
    Li, Chengjie
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)