Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Ning [1 ]
Chen, Linmu [2 ]
Liu, Lulu [3 ]
Rong, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Univ, Dept Pain Med, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0278846
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, and VIP databases, as well as dissertations and conference papers, to obtain randomized controlled trials comparing remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension before August 23, 2021. The primary outcomes included hemodynamic profiles, surgical field score, and blood loss. Extubation time, sedation and pain score at the PACU, and perioperative adverse events were the secondary outcomes. Nine randomized controlled trials with 543 patients (272 in the dexmedetomidine group and 271 in the remifentanil group) were eventually included. This meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in terms of surgical field score, blood loss, minimum values of mean arterial pressure (MD 0.24 with 95% CI [-1.65, 2.13], P = 0.80, I-2 = 66%) and heart rate (MD 0.42 [-1.33, 2.17], P = 0.64, I-2 = 40%), sedation scores at the PACU (MD -0.09 [-0.69, 0.50], P = 0.76, I-2 = 92%), and incidence of bradycardia (OR 2.24 [0.70, 7.15], P = 0.17, I-2 = 0%). Compared with remifentanil, dexmedetomidine as the controlled hypotensive agent showed a lower visual analogue score at the PACU (MD -1.01 [-1.25, -0.77], P<0.00001, I-2 = 0%) and incidence of shivering (OR 0.22 [0.08, 0.60], P = 0.003, I-2 = 0%), nausea, and vomiting (OR 0.34 [0.13, 0.89], P = 0.03, I-2 = 0%). However, extubation time was shorter in the remifentanil group (MD 3.34 [0.75, 5.93], P = 0.01, I-2 = 90%). In conclusion, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil are both effective in providing satisfactory controlled hypotension and surgical conditions. Dexmedetomidine is better in easing postoperative pain at the PACU and reducing the occurrence of shivering, nausea, and vomiting. Meanwhile, remifentanil is a fast-track anesthesia with a shorter extubation time. Given the limitations of this meta-analysis, further studies are needed for a more definitive comparison of the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraoperative remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Grape, S.
    Kirkham, K.
    Frauenknecht, J.
    Albrecht, E.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2019, : 2S - 2S
  • [2] Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil in nasal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Janipour, Masoud
    Bastaninejad, Shahin
    Mohebbi, Alireza
    Amali, Amin
    Owji, Seyed Hossein
    Jazi, Kimia
    Mirali, Rojan Abdollahzadeh
    Moshfeghinia, Reza
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [3] Dexmedetomidine for craniotomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Wang, Li
    Shen, Jiantong
    Ge, Long
    Arango, Miguel F.
    Tang, Xueli
    Moodie, Jessica
    McConnell, Brieanne
    Cheng, Davy
    Martin, Janet
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2019, 54 : 114 - 125
  • [4] Use of dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension in middle ear surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Munhall, Christopher C.
    Warner, Brendon K.
    Nguyen, Shaun A.
    Guldan III, George J.
    Meyer, Ted A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 44 (04)
  • [5] General Anesthesia Versus Local Anesthesia in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Harky, Amer
    Chan, Jeffrey Shi Kai
    Kot, Thompson Ka Ming
    Sanli, Dilan
    Rahimli, Rashad
    Belamaric, Zlatka
    Ng, Marcus
    Kwant, Ian Yu Young
    Bithas, Christiana
    Makar, Ragai
    Chandrasekar, Ramasubramanyan
    Dimitri, Sameh
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (01) : 219 - 234
  • [6] Neonatal effect of remifentanil in cesarean section with general anesthesia A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Qi
    Kan, Hong-Li
    Wang, Dong-Xin
    Fu, Dong-Mei
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (20)
  • [7] Effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on neonatal outcomes after caesarean section under general anaesthesia A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Myeongjong
    Kim, Hyungtae
    Lee, Cheol
    Kang, Hyun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 38 (10) : 1085 - 1095
  • [8] Comparison of Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Sufentanil and Alfentanil in Combination with Propofol for General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sridharan, Kannan
    Sivaramakrishnan, Gowri
    CURRENT CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 14 (02): : 116 - 124
  • [9] Caudal dexmedetomidine in pediatric caudal anesthesia A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Xian-xue
    Dai, Jing
    Dai, Li
    Guo, Hua-jing
    Zhou, Ai-guo
    Pan, Dao-bo
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (31)
  • [10] The efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pu, Chunxiao
    Wang, Jia
    Tang, Yin
    Yuan, Haichao
    Li, Jinhong
    Bai, Yunjin
    Wang, Xiaoming
    Wei, Qiang
    Han, Ping
    UROLITHIASIS, 2015, 43 (05) : 455 - 466