Phenotypical characterization of African savannah and forest elephants, with special emphasis on hybrids: the case of Kibale National Park, Uganda

被引:0
|
作者
Bonnald, Julie [1 ,3 ]
Cornette, Raphael [2 ]
Pichard, Maellie [3 ]
Asalu, Edward [4 ]
Krief, Sabrina [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Paris VII, CNRS, Museum Natl Hist Nat, UMR7206 Ecoanthropol, 17 Pl Trocadero, Paris, France
[2] Univ Antilles, Sorbonne Univ, EPHE, Museum Natl Hist Nat,CNRS,Inst Systemat,Evolut,Bi, Paris, France
[3] Sebitoli Chimpanzee Project, Ft Portal, Uganda
[4] Uganda Wildlife Author, Kampala, Uganda
关键词
African elephant; camera traps; hybridization area; Kibale National Park; morphological criteria; phenotype; Sebitoli; Uganda; LOXODONTA-AFRICANA; DNA;
D O I
10.1017/S0030605321001605
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The IUCN now recognizes the savannah Loxodonta africana and forest Loxodonta cyclotis elephants to be separate species. Despite ecological, behavioural and morphological differences, and different habitat ranges, genetic studies confirm that the two species and hybrids coexist in forest-savannah ecotones. However, the hybrid phenotypes have not yet been described. In this survey we examined whether the phenotypes of the two species and of hybrids can be distinguished. In the first step, we used a machine learning algorithm (K-nearest neighbours) to compare 296 reference images of African elephants from five forest areas and six savannah areas where hybrids have not been recorded, confirming that six morphological criteria can be used to distinguish the species with more than 90% confidence. In the second step, we analysed 1,408 videos of elephants from 14 camera traps in Sebitoli, in Kibale National Park, Uganda, part of the main hybridization area. We used a multiple correspondence analysis and a species assignment key, highlighting the presence of three categories of phenotypes. Compared to the savannah and forest phenotypes (36.8 and 12.1%, respectively), the intermediate phenotypes, which could include hybrids, were more frequent (51.1%). Further studies combining morphology and genetics of the same individuals will be necessary to refine this species assignment key to characterize phenotypes confidently. This non-invasive, fast and inexpensive phenotypical-based method could be a valuable tool for conservation programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 195
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Primate Seed Dispersers as Umbrella Species: A Case Study From Kibale National Park, Uganda, With Implications for Afrotropical Forest Conservation
    Lambert, Joanna E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2011, 73 (01) : 9 - 24
  • [22] Remotely sensed vegetation greening along a restoration gradient of a tropical forest, Kibale National Park, Uganda
    Valtonen, Anu
    Korkiatupa, Eveliina
    Holm, Sille
    Malinga, Geoffrey M.
    Nakadai, Ryosuke
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 32 (18) : 5166 - 5177
  • [23] The influence of forest variation and possible effects of poaching on duiker abundance at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda
    Lwanga, Jeremiah S.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2006, 44 (02) : 209 - 218
  • [24] Intensive tree planting facilitates tropical forest biodiversity and biomass accumulation in Kibale National Park, Uganda
    Omeja, Patrick A.
    Chapman, Colin A.
    Obua, Joseph
    Lwanga, Jeremiah S.
    Jacob, Aerin L.
    Wanyama, Frederick
    Mugenyi, Richard
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 261 (03) : 703 - 709
  • [25] Distinguishing forest tree communities in Kibale National Park, western Uganda using ordination and classification methods
    Mucunguzi, Patrick
    Kasenene, John
    Midgley, Jeremy
    Ssegawa, Paul
    Tabuti, John R. S.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2007, 45 : 99 - 108
  • [26] Chimpanzee nest distribution and density in mixed forest habitats of Mainaro, Kibale National Park, Uganda.
    Aronsen, Gary P.
    Teelen, Simone
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2010, : 57 - 58
  • [27] Microgeographical genetic structure of forest robusta coffee (Coffea canephora, Pierre), in Kibale National Park, Uganda
    Nyakaana, Silvester
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2007, 45 : 71 - 75
  • [28] Long-term trends in fruit production in a tropical forest at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda
    Potts, Kevin B.
    Watts, David P.
    Langergraber, Kevin E.
    Mitani, John C.
    BIOTROPICA, 2020, 52 (03) : 521 - 532
  • [29] Healthy baboon with no upper jaw or nose: an extreme case of adaptability in the Kibale National Park, Uganda
    Struhsaker, Thomas T.
    Chapman, Colin A.
    Pope, Theresa R.
    Marcus, Jeffrey R.
    PRIMATES, 2011, 52 (01) : 15 - 18
  • [30] How selective are elephants as agents of forest tree damage in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda?
    Ssali, Fredrick
    Sheil, Douglas
    Nkurunungi, John B.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2013, 51 (01) : 55 - 65