No influence of emotional expression on size underestimation of upright faces

被引:1
|
作者
Walsh, Eamonn [1 ,2 ]
Whitby, Jack [1 ]
Chen, Yen-Ya [1 ]
Longo, Matthew R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Basic & Clin Neurosci, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Cultural & Social Neurosci Res Grp, London, England
[3] Birkbeck Univ London, Dept Psychol Sci, London, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 02期
关键词
FOOD SAFETY; DENGUE KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; UNIVERSITY; STUDENTS; HYGIENE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0293920
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Faces are a primary means of conveying social information between humans. One important factor modulating the perception of human faces is emotional expression. Face inversion also affects perception, including judgments of emotional expression, possibly through the disruption of configural processing. One intriguing inversion effect is an illusion whereby faces appear to be physically smaller when upright than when inverted. This illusion appears to be highly selective for faces. In this study, we investigated whether the emotional expression of a face (neutral, happy, afraid, and angry) modulates the magnitude of this size illusion. Results showed that for all four expressions, there was a clear bias for inverted stimuli to be judged as larger than upright ones. This demonstrates that there is no influence of emotional expression on the size underestimation of upright faces, a surprising result given that recognition of different emotional expressions is known to be affected unevenly by inversion. Results are discussed considering recent neuroimaging research which used population receptive field (pRF) mapping to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying face perception features and which may provide an explanation for how an upright face appears smaller than an inverted one. Elucidation of this effect would lead to a greater understanding of how humans communicate.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MENTAL ROTATION OF FACES - HOLISTIC AND ANALYTIC PROCESSING OF UPRIGHT AND INVERTED FACES
    VALENTINE, T
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1986, 39 : A11 - A11
  • [22] Comparing Inverted Faces to Upright Faces Using Similarity or Mental Rotation
    Rakover, Sam S.
    Bar-On, Rani Amit
    Gliklich, Anna
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 135 (02): : 161 - 167
  • [23] Ambivalence over emotional expression and reading emotions in situations and faces
    King, LA
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (03) : 753 - 762
  • [24] Attention modulates the processing of emotional expression triggered by foveal faces
    Holmes, A
    Kiss, M
    Eimer, M
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2006, 394 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [25] Subliminal emotional expression influences behavioral and electrophysiological responses to faces
    Li, W
    Paller, KA
    Zinbarg, RE
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, : 162 - 162
  • [26] vMMN for schematic faces: automatic detection of change in emotional expression
    Kreegipuu, Kairi
    Kuldkepp, Nele
    Sibolt, Oliver
    Toom, Mai
    Allik, Jueri
    Naatanen, Risto
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [27] Implicit evaluations of faces depend on emotional expression and group membership
    Paulus, Andrea
    Wentura, Dirk
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 77 : 143 - 154
  • [28] The recognition of emotional expression in prosopagnosia: Decoding whole and part faces
    Stephan, Blossom Christa Maree
    Breen, Nora
    Caine, Diana
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 12 (06) : 884 - 895
  • [29] Influence of computer feedback on attentional biases to emotional faces in children
    Garcia-Blanco, Ana
    del Carmen Garcia-Blanco, Maria
    Fernando, Belen
    Perea, Manuel
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 64 : 881 - 887
  • [30] The influence of alexithymia on memory for emotional faces and realistic social interactions
    Ridout, Nathan
    Smith, Jade
    Hawkins, Holly
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2021, 35 (03) : 540 - 558