Importance of patient engagement in the conduct of pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trials: The ADAPTABLE experience

被引:4
|
作者
Marquis-Gravel, Guillaume [1 ]
Faulkner, Madelaine [2 ]
Merritt, Greg [3 ]
Farrehi, Peter [4 ]
Zemon, Nadine [5 ]
Robertson, Holly R. [1 ]
Jones, W. Schuyler [1 ,6 ]
Kraschnewski, Jennifer [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Patient Partner, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Patient Partner, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[7] Penn State Coll Med, Dept Med, 500 Univ Dr, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[8] Penn State Coll Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 500 Univ Dr, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
关键词
Patient engagement; pragmatic trials; randomized trials; patient-centered research; patients; CLINICAL-TRIALS; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1177/17407745221118559
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background/Aims Actively engaging patient partners in the conduct of trials is crucial to ensure the studies answer genuine, patient-centered, unmet clinical needs, and to facilitate participant recruitment and retention. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the feasibility of patient engagement within a large pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial, specifically for the purposes of dissemination of study information/updates and to favorize recruitment and retention. Methods In the patient-centric, pragmatic ADAPTABLE randomized trial, transparent and timely dissemination of information on the study updates to the trial participants was undertaken to create meaningful engagement and to facilitate retention. A national panel of patient partners, the Adaptors, were directly involved in this information dissemination strategy, and study participants were engaged both nationally and locally to design recruitment methods iteratively during the conduct of the trial. All Adaptors had a lived experience with cardiovascular disease. Results Adaptors attended bi-weekly meetings facilitated by the director of the study's patient-powered research network. They drafted and/or edited newsletters and ad hoc educational information written in a lay-friendly manner for study participants, which were regularly distributed to the ADAPTABLE community, in addition to online forums where participants could share their experience of their involvement in ADAPTABLE. To spur recruitment, a patient-driven initiative was to draft letters sharing their story, which were distributed by the local study teams. Patient partners thought that using patients' voice to provide their perspectives on why they believed this project was important would be more engaging for prospective participants than traditional approaches. Conclusions ADAPTABLE's experience has demonstrated the feasibility of engaging patients as partners in the conduct of a large-scale, multi-center, pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Future trials should embrace and iteratively improve this model by engaging patient partners as early as study protocol development and funding applications, and quantify its impact on the effectiveness and value of the trial.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 35
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantifying Challenges for the Conduct of Pilot Randomized Controlled Trials of Critically Ill Patients
    Rose, L.
    Burns, K. E.
    Smith, O. M.
    Marshall, J. C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 179
  • [42] Violation of the uncertainty principle in conduct of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of erythropoietin (EPO).
    Djulbegovic, B
    Bennett, CL
    Lyman, GH
    BLOOD, 1999, 94 (10) : 399A - 399A
  • [43] Proposals to Conduct Randomized Controlled Trials Without Informed Consent: a Narrative Review
    James H. Flory
    Alvin I. Mushlin
    Zachary I. Goodman
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2016, 31 : 1511 - 1518
  • [44] Randomized controlled psychotherapy trials in eating disorders: Improving their conduct, interpretation and usefulness
    Wade, Tracey D.
    Johnson, Catherine
    Byrne, Susan M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2018, 51 (07) : 629 - 636
  • [45] Ethical and epistemic issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trials
    Federico, Carole A.
    Heagerty, Patrick J.
    Lantos, John
    O'Rourke, Pearl
    Rahimzadeh, Vasiliki
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    Weinfurt, Kevin
    Wendler, David
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    Magnus, David
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 115
  • [46] Registry-based randomized controlled trials merged the strength of randomized controlled trails and observational studies and give rise to more pragmatic trials
    Mathes, Tim
    Buehn, Stefanie
    Prengel, Peggy
    Pieper, Dawid
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 93 : 120 - 127
  • [47] Clinical Importance of Effect Size in Randomized Controlled Trials Reply
    Livingston, Edward H.
    Elliot, Alan C.
    Hynan, Linda S.
    Cao, Jing
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2010, 145 (04) : 401 - 401
  • [48] "It is important to reinforce the importance of ... ": 'Hype' in reports of randomized controlled trials
    Millar, Neil
    Salager-Meyer, Francoise
    Budge, Brian
    ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 2019, 54 : 139 - 151
  • [49] Patient Barriers to Enrollment in IBD Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ravikoff, Jessica
    Cole, Elisabeth B.
    Korzenik, Joshua R.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S265 - S265
  • [50] Patient adherence: A blind spot of randomized controlled trials?
    Davis, M
    Rathouz, P
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 1999, 47 (07) : 252A - 252A