Importance of patient engagement in the conduct of pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trials: The ADAPTABLE experience

被引:4
|
作者
Marquis-Gravel, Guillaume [1 ]
Faulkner, Madelaine [2 ]
Merritt, Greg [3 ]
Farrehi, Peter [4 ]
Zemon, Nadine [5 ]
Robertson, Holly R. [1 ]
Jones, W. Schuyler [1 ,6 ]
Kraschnewski, Jennifer [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Patient Partner, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Patient Partner, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[7] Penn State Coll Med, Dept Med, 500 Univ Dr, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[8] Penn State Coll Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 500 Univ Dr, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
关键词
Patient engagement; pragmatic trials; randomized trials; patient-centered research; patients; CLINICAL-TRIALS; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1177/17407745221118559
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background/Aims Actively engaging patient partners in the conduct of trials is crucial to ensure the studies answer genuine, patient-centered, unmet clinical needs, and to facilitate participant recruitment and retention. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the feasibility of patient engagement within a large pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial, specifically for the purposes of dissemination of study information/updates and to favorize recruitment and retention. Methods In the patient-centric, pragmatic ADAPTABLE randomized trial, transparent and timely dissemination of information on the study updates to the trial participants was undertaken to create meaningful engagement and to facilitate retention. A national panel of patient partners, the Adaptors, were directly involved in this information dissemination strategy, and study participants were engaged both nationally and locally to design recruitment methods iteratively during the conduct of the trial. All Adaptors had a lived experience with cardiovascular disease. Results Adaptors attended bi-weekly meetings facilitated by the director of the study's patient-powered research network. They drafted and/or edited newsletters and ad hoc educational information written in a lay-friendly manner for study participants, which were regularly distributed to the ADAPTABLE community, in addition to online forums where participants could share their experience of their involvement in ADAPTABLE. To spur recruitment, a patient-driven initiative was to draft letters sharing their story, which were distributed by the local study teams. Patient partners thought that using patients' voice to provide their perspectives on why they believed this project was important would be more engaging for prospective participants than traditional approaches. Conclusions ADAPTABLE's experience has demonstrated the feasibility of engaging patients as partners in the conduct of a large-scale, multi-center, pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Future trials should embrace and iteratively improve this model by engaging patient partners as early as study protocol development and funding applications, and quantify its impact on the effectiveness and value of the trial.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 35
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pragmatic patient engagement in designing pragmatic oncology clinical trials
    Davies-Teye, Bernard Bright
    Medeiros, Michelle
    Chauhan, Cynthia
    Baquet, Claudia Rose
    Mullins, C. Daniel
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (28) : 3691 - 3704
  • [2] Management and conduct of randomized controlled trials
    Knatterud, GL
    EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2002, 24 (01) : 12 - 25
  • [3] Pragmatic design in randomized controlled trials
    Purgato, M.
    Barbui, C.
    Stroup, S.
    Adams, C.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (02) : 225 - 230
  • [4] UNDERSTANDING RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - EXPLANATORY OR PRAGMATIC
    CHARLTON, BG
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 1994, 11 (03) : 243 - 244
  • [5] Utilizing Community Engagement Studios to inform patient experience in a multicenter randomized control trial
    Nielson, Christopher
    Huang, Yiqing
    Kull, C. Amanda
    Park, Albert H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 133
  • [6] Standardized Attending Rounds to Improve the Patient Experience: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
    Monash, Bradley
    Najafi, Nader
    Mourad, Michelle
    Rajkomar, Alvin
    Ranji, Sumant R.
    Fang, Margaret C.
    Glass, Marcia
    Milev, Dimiter
    Ding, Yile
    Shen, Andy
    Sharpe, Bradley A.
    Harrison, James D.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2017, 12 (03) : 143 - 149
  • [7] Multicenter randomized controlled trials in transfusion medicine
    Vamvakas, EC
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2000, 14 (02) : 137 - 150
  • [8] Accounting for Patient Engagement in Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapies
    Sverdlov, Oleksandr
    Ryeznik, Yevgen
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [9] Are randomized controlled trials controlled? Patient preferences and unblind trials
    McPherson, K
    Britton, AR
    Wennberg, JE
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1997, 90 (12) : 652 - 656
  • [10] The importance of patient-reported outcomes in pragmatic clinical trials
    Jim, Heather S. L.
    Brady-Nicholls, Renee
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2023, 115 (04): : 352 - 354