Validity, Reliability, and Factorial Structure of the Turkish Version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes in Obesity Questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Demircioglu, Arzu [1 ]
Ozkal, Ozden [2 ]
Dag, Osman [3 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Phys Therapy & Rehabil, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Bursa Uludag Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Bursa, Turkey
[3] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Biostat, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
adult; health; obesity; overweight; quality of life; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; WEIGHT-LOSS;
D O I
10.1089/bari.2021.0061
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The prevalence of being overweight and obesity is increasing at an alarming rate throughout the world. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is one of the most important issues to be investigated in obesity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity, reliability, and factorial structure of the Turkish version of the Patient Reported Outcomes in Obesity questionnaire (PROS).Methods: A total of 80 participants (40 overweight, 40 obese) were included in the study. The Impact of Weight on Quality of Life short version (IWQOL-lite) was used to determine validity. The PROS was readministered to 20 subjects after a 1-week interval for reliability analysis.Results: There was a high correlation between the PROS and IWQOL-lite mean scores (-0.855, p < 0.001). The test-retest reliability showed that the intraclass correlation coefficients (between 0.754 and 0.983) were significant for PROS. Factor analysis demonstrated a three-factor structure.Conclusions: PROS is a practical tool that is up-to-date, short, and easy to understand, implement, and calculate. The results of this study demonstrated that PROS is a valid and reliable questionnaire for measuring HRQoL in an overweight and obese Turkish population.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 55
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Illness Cognition Questionnaire
    Aytar, Aydan
    Aykul, Aysegul
    Altintas, Atahan
    Tigli, Ayca Aytar
    EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 2019, 45 (05) : 424 - 435
  • [32] Validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events
    Shan-Shan Yang
    Lei Chen
    Ying Liu
    Hai-Jun Lu
    Bo-Jie Huang
    Ai-Hua Lin
    Ying Sun
    Jun Ma
    Fang-Yun Xie
    Yan-Ping Mao
    BMC Cancer, 21
  • [33] Validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events
    Yang, Shan-Shan
    Chen, Lei
    Liu, Ying
    Lu, Hai-Jun
    Huang, Bo-Jie
    Lin, Ai-Hua
    Sun, Ying
    Ma, Jun
    Xie, Fang-Yun
    Mao, Yan-Ping
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [34] The reliability and factorial validity of the Swedish version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire
    Almen, Niclas
    Lundberg, Hanna
    Sundin, Orjan
    Jansson, Billy
    NORDIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 70 (04) : 324 - 333
  • [35] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Daily Experiences Questionnaire (Turkish DEQ)
    Balkaya, Nevin Akdolun
    Bektas, Murat
    Cayan, Asli
    PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (01): : 7 - 17
  • [36] Transcultural adaptation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Obesity (PROS) questionnaire for Brazil
    Traebert, Jefferson
    Rodrigues, Michael Douglas
    Chaves, Manuella Souto
    Moritz, Nicole Morem Pilau
    Nunes, Rodrigo Dias
    Cremona-Parma, Gabriel Oscar
    Traebert, Eliane
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE EPIDEMIOLOGIA, 2022, 25
  • [37] Validity and reliability of the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Mendoza, Tito R.
    Mitchell, Sandra A.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Castro, Kathleen M.
    Denicoff, Andrea
    O'Mara, Ann M.
    Rogak, Lauren J.
    Clauser, Steven B.
    Bryant, Donna M.
    Gillis, Theresa A.
    Bearden, James D.
    Siegel, Robert D.
    Harness, Jay K.
    Paul, Diane B.
    Cleeland, Charles S.
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    Schrag, Deborah
    Minasian, Lori M.
    Basch, Ethan M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [38] TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY
    Karaca, Seda
    Bayar, Banu
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY REHABILITATION-TURK FIZYOTERAPI VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI, 2021, 32 (01): : 44 - 50
  • [39] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire
    Yildiz, Nazim Tolgahan
    Alkan, Afra
    Kulunkoglu, Bahar Anaforoglu
    CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 2024, 42 (02): : 160 - 170
  • [40] The Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Study Process Questionnaire
    Yilmaz, M. Betul
    Orhan, Feza
    EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2011, 36 (159): : 69 - 83