Remote measurement based care (RMBC) interventions for mental health-Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Machleid, Felix [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Michnevich, Twyla [1 ]
Huang, Leu [6 ]
Schroeder-Frerkes, Louisa [7 ]
Wiegmann, Caspar [8 ,9 ]
Muffel, Toni [9 ]
Kaminski, Jakob [1 ,5 ,9 ]
Demurtas, Jacopo [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Charite Campus Mitte, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[4] Berlin Inst Hlth, Berlin, Germany
[5] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin Inst Hlth, Berlin, Germany
[6] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum, Dept Infect Dis & Resp Med, Berlin, Germany
[7] Krankenhaus Urban, Clin Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Berlin, Germany
[8] Clin Theodor Wenzel Werk, Clin Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
[9] Recovery Cat GmbH, Berlin, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 02期
关键词
DEPRESSION; INPATIENTS; EFFICIENCY; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0297929
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Poor management of mental illnesses is associated with lower treatment adherence, chronification, avoidable re-hospitalisations, and high costs. Remote measurement based care (RMBC) interventions have gained increasing relevance due to its potential in providing a comprehensive and patient-centric approach to mental health management.Objectives The systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview and analysis of existing evidence on the use of RMBC for patients with mental illness and to examine the effectiveness of RMBC interventions in alleviating disorder-specific symptoms, reducing relapse and improving recovery-oriented outcomes, global functioning, and quality of life.Methods and analysis Our multidisciplinary research team will develop a comprehensive search strategy, adapted to each electronic database (PubMed, Medline, Embase, and PsychINFO) to be examined systematically. Studies with patients formally diagnosed by the International Classification of Diseases or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders which include assessment of self-reported psychiatric symptoms will be included. Publications will be reviewed by teams of independent researchers. Quality of studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Outcomes cover symptom-focused or disease-specific outcomes, relapse, recovery-focused outcomes, global functioning, quality of life and acceptability of the intervention. Further data that will be extracted includes study characteristics, target population, intervention, and tracking characteristics. Data will be synthesised qualitatively, summarising findings of the systematic review. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) will be considered for meta-analysis if data is found comparable in terms of mental illness, study design and outcomes. Cumulative evidence will be evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.Trial registration Trial registration number: PROSPERO CRD42022356176.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Duncan, Sallyanne
    Mc Gaughey, Jennifer
    Fallis, Richard
    McAuley, Daniel F.
    Walshe, Margaret
    Blackwood, Bronagh
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [22] Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sallyanne Duncan
    Jennifer Mc Gaughey
    Richard Fallis
    Daniel F. McAuley
    Margaret Walshe
    Bronagh Blackwood
    Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [23] Bridging the Gap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Address Barriers in Migrant Mental Health Care Access
    Marchi, Mattia
    Laquatra, Giuseppe
    Yaaqovy, Ahikam David
    Pingani, Luca
    Ferrari, Silvia
    Galeazzi, Gian Maria
    PSYCHIATRY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 5 (04): : 883 - 903
  • [24] Religious and spiritual interventions in mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Goncalves, J. P. B.
    Lucchetti, G.
    Menezes, P. R.
    Vallada, H.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (14) : 2937 - 2949
  • [25] A systematic review and meta-analysis of transdiagnostic interventions for common mental disorders in primary care
    Vogel, Marie
    Ebert, Christopher
    Gensichen, Jochen
    Applis, Hanna
    Hasan, Alkomiet
    Lochbuehler, Kirsten
    GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 91 : 167 - 179
  • [26] Health coaching interventions for persons with chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Boehmer K.R.
    Barakat S.
    Ahn S.
    Prokop L.J.
    Erwin P.J.
    Murad M.H.
    Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [27] Mobile Health Technology Interventions for Suicide Prevention: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Melia, Ruth
    Francis, Kady
    Duggan, Jim
    Bogue, John
    O'Sullivan, Mary
    Chambers, Derek
    Young, Karen
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2018, 7 (01):
  • [28] Efficacy of Gamified Digital Mental Health Interventions for Pediatric Mental Health Conditions A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bryant, Barry R.
    Sisk, Morgan R.
    Mcguire, Joseph F.
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2024, 178 (11) : 1136 - 1146
  • [29] A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis of the physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions
    Packheiser, Julian
    Hartmann, Helena
    Fredriksen, Kelly
    Gazzola, Valeria
    Keysers, Christian
    Michon, Frederic
    NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2024, 8 (06) : 1088 - 1107
  • [30] Effect of Engagement With Digital Interventions on Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gan, Daniel Z. Q.
    McGillivray, Lauren
    Han, Jin
    Christensen, Helen
    Torok, Michelle
    FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2021, 3