Brain Network Analysis: A Review on Multivariate Analytical Methods

被引:2
|
作者
Bahrami, Mohsen [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Laurienti, Paul J. [1 ,2 ]
Shappell, Heather M. [1 ,3 ]
Simpson, Sean L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Lab Complex Brain Networks, Winston Salem, NC USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Winston Salem, NC USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
brain networks; connectivity; data-driven; model-based; multivariate; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; MODELING FRAMEWORK; FMRI DATA; SUBJECT; CLASSIFICATION; IDENTIFICATION; ARCHITECTURE; COMPLEXITY; PATHWAYS;
D O I
10.1089/brain.2022.0007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Despite the explosive growth of neuroimaging studies aimed at analyzing the brain as a complex system, critical methodological gaps remain to be addressed. Most tools currently used for analyzing network data of the brain are univariate in nature and are based on assumptions borne out of previous techniques not directly related to the big and complex data of the brain. Although graph-based methods have shown great promise, the development of principled multivariate models to address inherent limitations of graph-based methods, such as their dependence on network size and degree distributions, and to allow assessing the effects of multiple phenotypes on the brain and simulating brain networks has largely lagged behind. Although some studies have been made in developing multivariate frameworks to fill this gap, in the absence of a "gold-standard" method or guidelines, choosing the most appropriate method for each study can be another critical challenge for investigators in this multidisciplinary field. Here, we briefly introduce important multivariate methods for brain network analyses in two main categories: data-driven and model-based methods. We discuss whether/how such methods are suited for examining connectivity (edge-level), topology (system-level), or both. This review will aid in choosing an appropriate multivariate method with respect to variables such as network type, number of subjects and brain regions included, and the interest in connectivity, topology, or both. This review is aimed to be accessible to investigators from different backgrounds, with a focus on applications in brain network studies, though the methods may be applicable in other areas too. Impact statementAs the U.S. National Institute of Health notes, the rich biomedical data can greatly improve our knowledge of human health if new analytical tools are developed, and their applications are broadly disseminated. A major challenge in analyzing the brain as a complex system is about developing parsimonious multivariate methods, and particularly choosing the most appropriate one among the existing methods with respect to the study variables in this multidisciplinary field. This study provides a review on the most important multivariate methods to aid in helping the most appropriate ones with respect to the desired variables for each study.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 79
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Analytical Review of the Numerical Methods used for Finite Element Modeling of Traumatic Brain Injury
    J. Sebastian Giudice
    Wei Zeng
    Taotao Wu
    Ahmed Alshareef
    Daniel F. Shedd
    Matthew B. Panzer
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2019, 47 : 1855 - 1872
  • [42] A new and consistent parameter for measuring the quality of multivariate analytical methods: Generalized analytical sensitivity
    Fragoso, Wallace
    Allegrini, Franco
    Olivieri, Alejandro C.
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2016, 933 : 43 - 49
  • [43] An Analytical Review of the Numerical Methods used for Finite Element Modeling of Traumatic Brain Injury
    Giudice, J. Sebastian
    Zeng, Wei
    Wu, Taotao
    Alshareef, Ahmed
    Shedd, Daniel F.
    Panzer, Matthew B.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 47 (09) : 1855 - 1872
  • [44] Multivariate analytical approaches for investigating brain-behavior relationships
    Durham, E. Leighton
    Ghanem, Karam
    Stier, Andrew J.
    Cardenas-Iniguez, Carlos
    Reimann, Gabrielle E.
    Jeong, Hee Jung
    Dupont, Randolph M.
    Dong, Xiaoyu
    Moore, Tyler M.
    Berman, Marc G.
    Lahey, Benjamin B.
    Bzdok, Danilo
    Kaczkurkin, Antonia N.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [45] EMPAGLIFLOZIN: A REVIEW ON ANALYTICAL AND BIO-ANALYTICAL METHODS
    Rahul, S.
    Kumar, B. Prakash
    Avinash, H. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (09): : 4144 - 4151
  • [46] Mini-Review on Analytical Methods Applied for Analysis and Characterization of Sericin
    Kanoujia, Jovita
    Dubey, Rudrakshi
    Debgharia, Sumana
    Sisodia, Priyanjali
    Mohanalakshmi, Sabapathi
    Bhatt, Shvetank
    Parashar, Poonam
    Kishore, Ankita
    CURRENT ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2023, 19 (02) : 119 - 129
  • [47] An empirical comparison of univariate versus multivariate methods for the analysis of brain-behavior mapping
    Ivanova, Maria V.
    Herron, Timothy J.
    Dronkers, Nina F.
    Baldo, Juliana V.
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2021, 42 (04) : 1070 - 1101
  • [48] A bibliometric review of urban energy metabolism: Evolutionary trends and the application of network analytical methods
    Tang, Miaohan
    Hong, Jingke
    Guo, Shan
    Liu, Guiwen
    Shen, Geoffrey Qiping
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 279
  • [49] Research on brain functional network property analysis and recognition methods targeting brain fatigue
    Wei Yan
    Jiajun He
    Yaoxing Peng
    Haozhe Ma
    Chunguang Li
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)
  • [50] Multivariate analysis methods for spectroscopic blood analysis
    Wood, Michael F. G.
    Rohani, Arash
    Ghazalah, Rashid
    Vitkin, I. Alex
    Pawluczyk, Romuald
    BIOMEDICAL VIBRATIONAL SPECTROSCOPY V: ADVANCES IN RESEARCH AND INDUSTRY, 2012, 8219