Development, reliability, and validity of a self-assessment scale for dementia care management

被引:0
|
作者
Kazawa, Kana [1 ,3 ]
Mochizuki, Mariko [2 ]
Ochikubo, Hiroyuki [2 ]
Ishii, Shinya [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Med Integrated Approach Social Inclus, Hiroshima, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Care Manager Assoc, Hiroshima, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Med Integrated Approach Social Inclus, Kasumi 1-2-3 Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan
关键词
dementia; long-term care; self-assessment; validation study;
D O I
10.1111/psyg.12937
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BackgroundThis study aimed to develop a self-assessment scale for care management of people with dementia and examine its reliability and validity. MethodsBased on Bloom's Taxonomy, previous research, and experts' opinions on dementia and care management, a scale consisting of 18 items was developed to assess care managers' attitudes, knowledge, and skills in their management of people with dementia. To examine the scale's reliability and validity, data were collected from 638 care managers. Construct validity using exploratory factor analysis, known-group validity, and internal consistency reliability of the scale were evaluated. ResultsExploratory factor analysis supported the construct validity with a four-factor model and explained 59.1% of the total variance. Following were the four factors: Factor I 'Person centred care'; Factor II 'Understanding of disease characteristics, treatment and care'; Factor III 'Understanding of people with dementia and care management according to their characteristics'; and Factor IV 'Utilization of local resources surrounding people with dementia'. Regarding the known-group validity, results showed that the group with a qualified chief care manager scored significantly higher than the group without one on Factors I (P = 0.013) and III (P = 0.026). Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the 18 items was 0.928. ConclusionsThe findings prove that the scale has acceptable reliability and validity, and can help care managers reflect on their practice. Future research is desirable to measure the validation of change in the scale.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:345 / 353
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity and reliability of self-assessment of sexual maturity in elite adolescent athletes
    Leone, M.
    Comtois, A. S.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2007, 47 (03): : 361 - 365
  • [32] Examining the Reliability and Validity of the Effective Behavior Support Self-Assessment Survey
    Solomon, Benjamin G.
    Tobin, Kevin G.
    Schutte, Gregory M.
    EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN, 2015, 38 (02) : 175 - 191
  • [33] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Male Andropause Symptoms Self-Assessment Questionnaire
    Cetin, Ahmet Mesut
    Baylan, Burhan
    Imamoglu, Muhammet Abdurrahim
    Akbayrak, Turkan
    JOURNAL OF MID-LIFE HEALTH, 2023, 14 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [34] Self-assessment of psychological stress in schizophrenia: Preliminary evidence of reliability and validity
    Tso, Ivy Fei
    Grove, Tyler Barrett
    Taylor, Stephan Floyd
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2012, 195 (1-2) : 39 - 44
  • [35] A community needs assessment: The care needs assessment pack for dementia (CarenapD) - Its development, reliability and validity
    McWalter, G
    Toner, H
    McWalter, A
    Eastwood, J
    Marshall, M
    Turvey, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 13 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [36] Validity and reliability of a self-assessment scale for Dental and Oral Health student's perception of transferable skills in Australia
    Sun, Jing
    Adegbosin, Adeyinka Emmanuel
    Reher, Vanessa
    Rehbein, Gail
    Evans, Jane
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2020, 24 (01) : 42 - 52
  • [37] Reliability and Validity of Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale in Turkish Population
    Ayan, Gizem
    Afacan, Ceyda
    Poyraz, Burc Cagri
    Bilgic, Onur
    Avci, Suna
    Yavuzer, Hakan
    Yuruyen, Mehmet
    Erdincler, Deniz Suna
    Ayan, Burak
    Doventas, Alper
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND OTHER DEMENTIAS, 2019, 34 (01): : 34 - 40
  • [38] Content Validity for a Child Care Self-assessment Tool: Creating Healthy Eating Environments Scale (CHEERS)
    Lafave, Lynne
    Tyminski, Sheila
    Riege, Theresa
    Hoy, Diane
    Dexter, Bria
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIETETIC PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2016, 77 (02) : 89 - 92
  • [39] Validity and reliability of adapted Bengali version of self-assessment questionnaire to assess Prakriti
    Mondal, Himel
    Baidya, Chayan
    Mondal, Shaikat
    Mondal, Sarika
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AYURVEDIC MEDICINE, 2022, 13 (04) : 1017 - 1022
  • [40] Can we trust the answers? Reliability and validity of ergonomic self-assessment surveys
    Cai, Xiaodong
    Laestadius, Jasminka Goldoni
    Ross, Sandra
    Dimberg, Lennart
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2007, 49 (10) : 1055 - 1059