Carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation using macroalgae: a state of knowledge review

被引:52
|
作者
Pessarrodona, Albert [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Franco-Santos, Rita M. [4 ]
Wright, Luka Seamus [1 ,4 ]
Vanderklift, Mathew A. [4 ]
Howard, Jennifer [2 ,3 ]
Pidgeon, Emily [2 ,3 ]
Wernberg, Thomas [1 ,5 ]
Filbee-Dexter, Karen [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, UWA Oceans Inst, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Conservat Int, 2011 Crystal Dr, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
[3] Int Blue Carbon Inst, 42B Boat Quay, Singapore 049831, Singapore
[4] Indian Ocean Marine Res Ctr, CSIRO Environm, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[5] Inst Marine Res, Nye Flodevigveien 20, N-4817 His, Norway
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
carbon cycle; carbon dioxide removal; CO2; Fucales; Green House Gas; kelp; Sargassum; seaweed; DISSOLVED ORGANIC-MATTER; VEGETATED COASTAL HABITATS; DEEP-SEA; BLUE CARBON; GIANT-KELP; MACROCYSTIS-PYRIFERA; MARINE MACROPHYTES; ATMOSPHERIC CARBON; SUBMARINE-CANYON; ECKLONIA-MAXIMA;
D O I
10.1111/brv.12990
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The conservation, restoration, and improved management of terrestrial forests significantly contributes to mitigate climate change and its impacts, as well as providing numerous co-benefits. The pressing need to reduce emissions and increase carbon removal from the atmosphere is now also leading to the development of natural climate solutions in the ocean. Interest in the carbon sequestration potential of underwater macroalgal forests is growing rapidly among policy, conservation, and corporate sectors. Yet, our understanding of whether carbon sequestration from macroalgal forests can lead to tangible climate change mitigation remains severely limited, hampering their inclusion in international policy or carbon finance frameworks. Here, we examine the results of over 180 publications to synthesise evidence regarding macroalgal forest carbon sequestration potential. We show that research efforts on macroalgae carbon sequestration are heavily skewed towards particulate organic carbon (POC) pathways (77% of data publications), and that carbon fixation is the most studied flux (55%). Fluxes leading directly to carbon sequestration (e.g. carbon export or burial in marine sediments) remain poorly resolved, likely hindering regional or country-level assessments of carbon sequestration potential, which are only available from 17 of the 150 countries where macroalgal forests occur. To solve this issue, we present a framework to categorize coastlines according to their carbon sequestration potential. Finally, we review the multiple avenues through which this sequestration can translate into climate change mitigation capacity, which largely depends on whether management interventions can increase carbon removal above a natural baseline or avoid further carbon emissions. We find that conservation, restoration and afforestation interventions on macroalgal forests can potentially lead to carbon removal in the order of 10's of Tg C globally. Although this is lower than current estimates of natural sequestration value of all macroalgal habitats (61-268 Tg C year(-1)), it suggests that macroalgal forests could add to the total mitigation potential of coastal blue carbon ecosystems, and offer valuable mitigation opportunities in polar and temperate areas where blue carbon mitigation is currently low. Operationalizing that potential will necessitate the development of models that reliably estimate the proportion of production sequestered, improvements in macroalgae carbon fingerprinting techniques, and a rethinking of carbon accounting methodologies. The ocean provides major opportunities to mitigate and adapt to climate change, and the largest coastal vegetated habitat on Earth should not be ignored simply because it does not fit into existing frameworks.
引用
收藏
页码:1945 / 1971
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Can the Emerging European Seaweed Industry Contribute to Climate Change Mitigation by Enhancing Carbon Sequestration?
    Canvin, Maxine C.
    Borrero-Santiago, Ana R.
    Brook, Tom
    Gupta, Mollie
    Knoop, Jessica
    Menage, Georgina
    Moore, Pippa J.
    O'Connor, Nessa E.
    Ricart, Aurora M.
    Smale, Dan A.
    REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [42] Identifying and protecting macroalgae detritus sinks toward climate change mitigation
    Queiros, Ana M.
    Tait, Karen
    Clark, James R.
    Bedington, Michel
    Pascoe, Christine
    Torres, Ricardo
    Somerfield, Paul J.
    Smale, Dan A.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2023, 33 (03)
  • [43] Galapagos macroalgae: A review of the state of ecological knowledge
    Tompkins, Paul
    Wolff, Matthias
    REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA TROPICAL, 2017, 65 (01) : 375 - +
  • [44] Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change
    Lal, R
    GEODERMA, 2004, 123 (1-2) : 1 - 22
  • [45] CLIMATE CHANGE, CARBON SEQUESTRATION, AND PROPERTY RIGHTS
    Klass, Alexandra B.
    Wilson, Elizabeth J.
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 2010, (02): : 363 - 428
  • [46] Carbon sequestration and the role of biological carbon mitigation: A review.
    Farrelly, Damien J.
    Everard, Colm D.
    Fagan, Colette C.
    McDonnell, Kevin P.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 21 : 712 - 727
  • [47] Overlaps of indigenous knowledge and climate change mitigation: evidence from a systematic review
    Chanza, Nelson
    Musakwa, Walter
    Kelso, Clare
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2024, 6
  • [48] Research on carbon sequestration in gas reservoirs for climate disaster mitigation
    Tan, Yufei
    Lin, Tao
    STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT, 2007, : 265 - 270
  • [49] Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review
    Samer Fawzy
    Ahmed I. Osman
    John Doran
    David W. Rooney
    Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2020, 18 : 2069 - 2094
  • [50] Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review
    Fawzy, Samer
    Osman, Ahmed I.
    Doran, John
    Rooney, David W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2020, 18 (06) : 2069 - 2094