Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Lin, Haomin [1 ]
Zhang, Jinchang [1 ]
Li, Xujia [1 ]
Li, Yuanquan [2 ]
Su, Song [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gen Surg Hepatobiliary Surg, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Network meta-analysis; Gallbladder diseases; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SITE CHOLECYSTECTOMY; PORT; MULTICENTER; COSMESIS;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-022-01387-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Benign gallbladder diseases are common in surgery department, and the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard procedure for benign diseases of gallbladder. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is conventionally performed using four laparoscopic ports. However, the clinical application of different LCs is equivocal and there is no comprehensive comparison to explore which surgical options could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases. A network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of the different LCs could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases by comprehensive comparison. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochran Library. Totally, 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1627) met study selection criteria and were incorporated in this NMA study. The first ranking probabilities of the five surgical options to alleviate postoperative pain scores were: 54.4% for single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC), 25.2% for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SALC), and 24.9% for mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Mini). The first ranking probabilities for reducing postoperative complications in the surgical options were: 61.3% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 21.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing hospital stay(days) in the surgical options were: 32.3% for SIRC, 29.0% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 19.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing operation time showed that the three-port technique had the shortest operation time, followed by three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (51.3%), four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (26.8%), and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (21.6%). Our study found that the optimal surgical plan for different outcomes varies, making it difficult to give a comprehensive recommendation. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be the best options in terms of reducing surgical complications and operative time. Meanwhile, SIRC is the best options for relieving postoperative pain relief. SIRC and three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce hospital stay (days) compared other LCs.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 51
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Haomin Lin
    Jinchang Zhang
    Xujia Li
    Yuanquan Li
    Song Su
    [J]. Updates in Surgery, 2023, 75 : 41 - 51
  • [2] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Laura Evers
    Nicole Bouvy
    Dion Branje
    Andrea Peeters
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 3437 - 3448
  • [3] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Evers, Laura
    Bouvy, Nicole
    Branje, Dion
    Peeters, Andrea
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (09): : 3437 - 3448
  • [4] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Pereira, Chirag
    Gururaj, Shankar
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [5] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It a Plausible Alternative to the Traditional Four-Port Laparoscopic Approach?
    Pablo Arroyo, Juan
    Martin-del-Campo, Luis A.
    Torres-Villalobos, Gonzalo
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, 2012, 2012
  • [6] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments and Comparison with Three-Port Cholecystectomy
    Singh, Megha
    Mehta, Kuldeep Singh
    Yasir, Mir
    Kaur, Ameet
    Aiman, Aiffa
    Sharma, Akangsha
    Kaur, Neeraj
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S546 - S550
  • [7] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments and Comparison with Three-Port Cholecystectomy
    Megha Singh
    Kuldeep Singh Mehta
    Mir Yasir
    Ameet Kaur
    Aiffa Aiman
    Akangsha Sharma
    Neeraj Kaur
    [J]. Indian Journal of Surgery, 2015, 77 : 546 - 550
  • [8] Robotic Single-Incision Cholecystectomy vs Laparoscopic Single-Incision Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Lima Fonseca Rodrigues, Amanda Cyntia
    Nunes, Gabrielle Amaral
    Murari, Jean C.
    Andrade, Fernando Pontes
    Alencar, Mayara D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S315 - S315
  • [9] Single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Sun, Ning
    Zhang, Jia Lin
    Zhang, Cheng Shuo
    Li, Xiao Hang
    Shi, Yue
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (36)
  • [10] Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution
    F. Paul Buckley
    Hannah Vassaur
    Sharon Monsivais
    Daniel Jupiter
    Rob Watson
    John Eckford
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 626 - 630