Incidence of Surgical Reintervention for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Following Prostatic Urethral Lift, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, and Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: A TriNetX Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Feiertag, Jacob H. [1 ]
Kane, Jennifer A. [2 ]
Clark, Joseph Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Coll Med, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Penn State Hlth Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Hershey, PA USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Prostatic neoplasm; Transurethral resection of; prostate; Prostatectomy; Male urologic surgery; UroLift; Prostatic Urethral Lift; Reintervention; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; INVASIVE TREATMENT; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; UROLIFT; THERMOTHERAPY; PREVALENCE; ABLATION; TRENDS; REZUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.euros.2023.11.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Prostatic urethral lift, or UroLift, has gained popularity as a treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Surgical reintervention rates are a reliable indicator for treatment durability. Objective: The objective of this study was to utilize TriNetX, a third-party database, to investigate the incidence of surgical reintervention following UroLift, transure-thral resection of the prostate (TURP), and photoselective vaporization of the pros-tate (PVP) procedures for BPH from 2015 to 2018. Design, setting, and participants: Male patients aged 18-100 yr diagnosed with BPH were identified in the TriNetX Diamond Network database between January 2015 and December 2018. Cohorts of individuals undergoing their first UroLift procedure were built using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. TURP and PVP cohorts were built as comparison groups. The cohorts were then queried for subsequent BPH-related procedures. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Reprocedure rates were assessed and descriptive statistics were used. Results and limitations: The mean age at first-time UroLift was 70.1 +/- 9.4 yr (n = 14 343). Cumulative reprocedure rates collected after first-time UroLift included 1 yr after UroLift (5.1%, n = 14 343) and 4 yr after UroLift (16.1%, n = 710), with an average annual increase of +3.6% per year following 1 yr after the procedure. Comparatively, TURP (n = 22 071) and PVP (n = 14 110) had 4-yr reprocedure rates of 7.5% and 7.8%, respectively, during the same timeframe. Limitations include a lack of clinical data and loss of follow-up data outside the Diamond Network. Conclusions: The reprocedure rate of UroLift at 4 yr is double the rate of TURP and PVP. In appropriately selected patients, UroLift might be a suitable option for those who desire symptomatic relief from BPH with minimal erectile and ejaculatory side
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 70
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Initial clinical outcomes
    Sun, Jie
    Li, Dong
    Xue, Wei
    Zhou, Lixin
    Huang, Yiran
    Zhongguo Jiguang/Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2009, 36 (10): : 2687 - 2690
  • [32] Changes in Nocturia after Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate for Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Lee, Chang Ju
    Cho, Min Chul
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kim, Soo Woong
    Paick, Jae-Seung
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (08) : 531 - 536
  • [33] CHANGES IN ERECTILE FUNCTION AFTER PHOTOSELECTIVE VAPORIZATION OF THE PROSTATE FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA
    Zareba, Piotr
    Abdulla, Alym
    Bowen, Jim
    Hopkins, Rob
    Tarride, Jean-Eric
    Whelan, John Paul
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E813 - E814
  • [34] Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) for treatment of huge benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
    Gyunawoo, J.
    Yunchul, O.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 192 - 192
  • [35] Cost-effectiveness analysis at 2 years of surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia by photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight-Photo vaporization 120W versus transurethral resection of the prostate
    Benejam-Gual, J. M.
    Sanz-Granda, A.
    Garcia-Miralles Gravalos, R.
    Severa-Ruiz de Velasco, A.
    Pons-Viver, J.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2014, 38 (04): : 238 - 243
  • [36] Effects of photoselective vaporization of the prostate on urodynamics in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia - Comment
    Gonzalez, Ricardo R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (03): : 1028 - 1029
  • [37] A comparative study on the efficacy and safety of photoselective vaporization versus transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Shan, Y. X.
    Xue, B. X.
    Yang, D. R.
    Cui, Y.
    Gao, J.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A195 - A195
  • [38] Bipolar transurethral enucleation of prostate versus photoselective vaporization for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (>70 ml)
    Mu, Xiao-Nan
    Wang, Si-Jun
    Chen, Ji
    Jin, Xun-Bo
    Huang, Zhong-Xian
    Zhang, Long-Yang
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2017, 19 (05) : 608 - 612
  • [39] Prostatic Arterial Embolization versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Response
    Wang, Yi
    Gao, Yuan-an
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 276 (01) : 311 - 312
  • [40] Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia according to Prostate Size
    Park, Ju Hyun
    Son, Hwancheol
    Paick, Jae-Seung
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (02) : 115 - 121