Outcomes of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty performed in combination with, before, or after cataract surgery in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy: A review of the literature and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Mukhija, Ritika [1 ]
Henein, Christin [2 ]
Lee, Hanbin [1 ]
Phee, Jaewon [3 ]
Nanavaty, Mayank A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Brighton & Sussex Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Sussex Eye Hosp, Eastern Rd, Brighton, England
[2] Moorfields Eye Hosp, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Biomed Res Ctr Ophthalmol, London, England
[3] Univ Sussex, Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Brighton, England
[4] Brighton & Sussex Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Sussex Eye Hosp, Eastern Rd, Brighton BN2 5BF, England
关键词
Cataract surgery; DMEK; Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy; triple procedure; REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES; CORNEAL-DYSTROPHY; DMEK;
D O I
10.4103/ijo.IJO_1245_22
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
This review aimed to compare the outcomes of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in combination with (category 1), before (category 2), or after cataract surgery (category 3) in patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED). Primary outcome was gain in best-corrected log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcomes were graft detachment, rebubbling rates, rejection, failure, and endothelial cell loss (ECL). In category 1, 2, and 3, 12 studies (N = 1932) were included (five in category 1 [n = 696], one in category 2 [n = 286], and two in category 3 [n = 950], and the remaining four compared between two of the three categories). At 6 months, the gain in BCVA was 0.34 +/- 0.04, 0.25 +/- 0.03, and 0.38 +/- 0.03 logMAR in category 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The difference was significant between categories 1 and 2 (Chi(2) = 11.47, P < 0.01) and categories 2 and 3 (Chi(2) = 35.53, P < 0.01). At 12 months, the gain in BCVA was 0.52 +/- 0.05 and 0.38 +/- 0.06 logMAR in categories 1 & 3 (Chi(2) = 14.04, P < 0.01). The rebubbling rates were 15%, 4%, and 10% (P < 0.01) and the graft detachment rates were 31%, 8%, and 13% (P < 0.01) in categories 1, 2, and 3, respectively. However, graft rejection, survival rates, and ECL at 12 months were not different between categories 1 and 3. There is low certainty evidence that gain in BCVA in category 1 was comparable to category 3 at 6 months; however, it was significantly better with category 3 at 12 months. Although rebubbling and graft detachment rates were highest in category 1, there was no significant difference in graft rejection, survival rates, and ECL. Further high-quality studies are likely to change the effect estimate and have an impact on the confidence of the estimate.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 716
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a meta-analysis
    Zhu, Leru
    Zha, Yi
    Cai, Jianqiu
    Zhang, Yanling
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 38 (02) : 897 - 905
  • [22] Anterior Corneal Aberrations after Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy
    Patel, Sanjay V.
    Baratz, Keith H.
    Maguire, Leo J.
    Hodge, David O.
    McLaren, Jay W.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 119 (08) : 1522 - 1529
  • [23] Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases
    L Ham
    I Dapena
    C van Luijk
    J van der Wees
    G R J Melles
    Eye, 2009, 23 : 1990 - 1998
  • [24] Changes in Color Vision and Contrast Sensitivity After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy
    Cabrerizo, Javier
    Livny, Eitan
    Musa, Fayyaz U.
    Leeuwenburgh, Paulien
    van Dijk, Korine
    Melles, Gerrit R. J.
    CORNEA, 2014, 33 (10) : 1010 - 1015
  • [25] Patterns of Corneal Endothelialization and Corneal Clearance After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy
    Dirisamer, Martin
    Dapena, Isabel
    Ham, Lisanne
    van Dijk, Korine
    Oganes, Oganesyan
    Frank, Laurence E.
    van der Wees, Jacqueline
    Melles, Gerrit R. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 152 (04) : 543 - 555
  • [26] Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases
    Ham, L.
    Dapena, I.
    van Luijk, C.
    van der Wees, J.
    Melles, G. R. J.
    EYE, 2009, 23 (10) : 1990 - 1998
  • [27] Dark endothelial spots after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty may impose as recurrent Fuchs dystrophy
    Birbal, R.
    Zygoura, V.
    Baydoun, L.
    Dapena, I.
    Oellerich, S.
    Melles, G.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2018, 96 : 6 - 7
  • [28] Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for epithelial downgrowth after cataract surgery
    Jabbour, Samir
    Talajic, Julia
    Mabon, Michele
    Modabber, Milad
    Choremis, Johanna
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2019, 54 (03): : E151 - E153
  • [29] Descemetorhexis Without Endothelial Keratoplasty in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Franceschino, Adrien
    Dutheil, Frederic
    Pereira, Bruno
    Watson, Stephanie L.
    Chiambaretta, Frederic
    Navel, Valentin
    CORNEA, 2022, 41 (07) : 815 - 825
  • [30] Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty compared with ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a meta-analysis
    Sela, Tal Corina
    Iflah, Moti
    Muhsen, Khitam
    Zahavi, Alon
    BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 8 (01):