A patient journey audit tool (PJAT) to assess quality indicators in a nuclear medicine service

被引:1
|
作者
Pathmaraj, Kunthi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Welch, Jessica [1 ]
Ng, Wesley [1 ]
Lee, Danny [1 ]
Lee, Sze Ting [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Brink, Anita [6 ]
Dondi, Maurizio [6 ]
Paez, Diana [6 ]
Scott, Andrew M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hlth, Dept Mol Imaging & Therapy, Level 1,Harold Stokes Bldg,Studley Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Olivia Newton John Canc Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Canc Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth & Biomed Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] IAEA, Div Human Hlth, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Patient journey audit tool; Quality indicators; Clinical governance; Nuclear medicine; PET;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-024-06627-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo develop a nuclear medicine specific patient journey audit tool (PJAT) to survey and audit patient journeys in a nuclear medicine department such as staff interaction with patients, equipment, quality of imaging and laboratory procedures, patient protection, infection control and radiation safety, with a view to optimising patient care and providing a high-quality nuclear medicine service.MethodsThe PJAT was developed specifically for use in nuclear medicine practices. Thirty-two questions were formulated in the PJAT to test the department's compliance to the Australian National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards, namely clinical governance, partnering with consumers, preventing and controlling health care infection, medication safety, comprehensive care, communicating for safety, blood management and recognising and responding to acute deterioration. The PJAT was also designed to test our department's adherence to diagnostic reference levels (DRL). A total of 60 patient journey audits were completed for patients presenting for nuclear medicine, positron emission tomography and bone mineral density procedures during a consecutive 4-week period to audit the range of procedures performed. A further 120 audits were captured for common procedures in nuclear medicine and positron emission tomography during the same period. Thus, a total of 180 audits were completed. A subset of 12 patients who presented for blood labelling procedures were audited to solely assess the blood management standard.ResultsThe audits demonstrated over 85% compliance for the Australian national health standards. One hundred percent compliance was noted for critical aspects such as correct patient identification for the correct procedure prior to radiopharmaceutical administration, adherence to prescribed dose limits and distribution of the report within 24 h of completion of the imaging procedure.ConclusionThis PJAT can be applied in nuclear medicine departments to enhance quality programmes and patient care. Austin Health has collaborated with the IAEA to formulate the IAEA PJAT, which is now available globally for nuclear medicine departments to survey patient journeys.
引用
收藏
页码:1816 / 1825
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SOCIAL MEDIA: A VALUABLE TOOL TO ASSESS PATIENT PERSPECTIVES REGARDING QUALITY OF LIFE
    Kalf, R.
    Makady, A.
    Ryll, B.
    Spurrier, G.
    Goettsch, W.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A749 - A749
  • [42] Developing Consensus Indicators to Assess Pharmacy Service Quality at Primary Health Centres in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    Satibi, Satibi
    Rokhman, M. Rifqi
    Aditama, Hardika
    [J]. MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 26 (04): : 110 - 121
  • [43] An Electronic Tool for Visual Feedback to Monitor the Adherence to Quality Indicators in Intensive Care Medicine
    Kastrup, M.
    Nolting, M. J.
    Ahlborn, R.
    Braun, J-P
    Grubitzsch, H.
    Wernecke, K-D
    Spies, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 39 (06) : 2187 - 2200
  • [44] COMMUNITY ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA AUDIT TOOL IDENTIFIES UNWARRANTED VARIATION IN INDICATORS OF CLINICAL CARE TO TARGET SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS
    Peter, Collett W.
    Ahmed, Hussein
    Marta, Zajaczkowska
    Linda, Zang
    Jess, Drysdale
    Cecily, Barrack
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2017, 22 : 189 - 189
  • [45] Establishing quality indicators to comprehensively assess quality assurance and patient safety in radiotherapy and their relationship with an institution's background
    Mizuno, Norifumi
    Okamoto, Hiroyuki
    Minemura, Toshiyuki
    Kawamura, Shinji
    Tohyama, Naoki
    Kurooka, Masahiko
    Kawamorita, Ryu
    Nakamura, Masaru
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Shioyama, Yoshiyuki
    Aoyama, Hidefumi
    Igaki, Hiroshi
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 179
  • [46] Quality Management in Nuclear Medicine for Better Patient Care: The IAEA Program
    Dondi, Maurizio
    Kashyap, Ravi
    Pascual, Thomas
    Paez, Diana
    Nunez-Miller, Rodolfo
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 43 (03) : 167 - 171
  • [47] Interlaboratory quality assessment program in the department of veterans affairs, nuclear medicine service
    Fig, LM
    duFour, R
    Carrier, LK
    Gross, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1996, 37 (05): : 1423 - 1423
  • [48] Service evaluation of Paediatric allergy clinic: patient experience survery as a quality and service improvement tool
    Raman, M.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2016, 46 (12): : 1661 - 1661
  • [49] A Statistical Survey Report to Assess Patient Satisfaction with Performance of Hospital for Service Quality Improvement
    Mirza, Humayun
    Ismail, Muhammad
    Sheikh, Zafar Iqbal
    Rasheed, Hanzla
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2016, 10 (04): : 1399 - 1402
  • [50] MORBIDITY-MORTALITY AS QUALITY INDICATORS OF HEALTH-CARE IN THE INTERNAL-MEDICINE SERVICE
    VIANA, A
    DELGADO, V
    DELAMORENA, J
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 1991, 96 (16): : 637 - 638