A patient journey audit tool (PJAT) to assess quality indicators in a nuclear medicine service

被引:1
|
作者
Pathmaraj, Kunthi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Welch, Jessica [1 ]
Ng, Wesley [1 ]
Lee, Danny [1 ]
Lee, Sze Ting [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Brink, Anita [6 ]
Dondi, Maurizio [6 ]
Paez, Diana [6 ]
Scott, Andrew M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hlth, Dept Mol Imaging & Therapy, Level 1,Harold Stokes Bldg,Studley Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Olivia Newton John Canc Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Canc Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth & Biomed Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] IAEA, Div Human Hlth, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Patient journey audit tool; Quality indicators; Clinical governance; Nuclear medicine; PET;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-024-06627-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo develop a nuclear medicine specific patient journey audit tool (PJAT) to survey and audit patient journeys in a nuclear medicine department such as staff interaction with patients, equipment, quality of imaging and laboratory procedures, patient protection, infection control and radiation safety, with a view to optimising patient care and providing a high-quality nuclear medicine service.MethodsThe PJAT was developed specifically for use in nuclear medicine practices. Thirty-two questions were formulated in the PJAT to test the department's compliance to the Australian National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards, namely clinical governance, partnering with consumers, preventing and controlling health care infection, medication safety, comprehensive care, communicating for safety, blood management and recognising and responding to acute deterioration. The PJAT was also designed to test our department's adherence to diagnostic reference levels (DRL). A total of 60 patient journey audits were completed for patients presenting for nuclear medicine, positron emission tomography and bone mineral density procedures during a consecutive 4-week period to audit the range of procedures performed. A further 120 audits were captured for common procedures in nuclear medicine and positron emission tomography during the same period. Thus, a total of 180 audits were completed. A subset of 12 patients who presented for blood labelling procedures were audited to solely assess the blood management standard.ResultsThe audits demonstrated over 85% compliance for the Australian national health standards. One hundred percent compliance was noted for critical aspects such as correct patient identification for the correct procedure prior to radiopharmaceutical administration, adherence to prescribed dose limits and distribution of the report within 24 h of completion of the imaging procedure.ConclusionThis PJAT can be applied in nuclear medicine departments to enhance quality programmes and patient care. Austin Health has collaborated with the IAEA to formulate the IAEA PJAT, which is now available globally for nuclear medicine departments to survey patient journeys.
引用
收藏
页码:1816 / 1825
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: A fundamental tool for quality and patient safety
    Plebani, Mario
    Sciacovelli, Laura
    Marinova, Mariela
    Marcuccitti, Jessica
    Chiozza, Maria Laura
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 46 (13-14) : 1170 - 1174
  • [2] An integrated patient journey mapping tool for embedding quality in healthcare service reform
    McCarthy, Stephen
    O'Raghallaigh, Paidi
    Woodworth, Simon
    Lim, Yoke Lin
    Kenny, Louise C.
    Adam, Frederic
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2016, 25 : 354 - 368
  • [3] Reliability of the Service Trip Audit Tool to assess the quality of short-term medical missions
    Dainton, Christopher
    Gorman, Christina
    Cherniak, William
    Lopez, Lorena
    Chu, Charlene H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2021, 13 (06): : 606 - 614
  • [4] An IAEA tool to assess staffing needs in Nuclear Medicine
    Marengo, M.
    Dondi, M.
    Bomanji, J.
    Baigorria, S. A.
    Bouyoucef, S.
    Elias, E. W.
    Pascual, T. E.
    Paez, D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (SUPPL 1) : S262 - S262
  • [5] Patients' and personnel's perceptions of service quality and patient satisfaction in nuclear medicine
    De Man, S
    Gemmel, P
    Vlerick, P
    Van Rijk, P
    Dierckx, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (09) : 1109 - 1117
  • [6] Repeated parallel patient surveys: Their usefulness for improving nuclear medicine service quality
    Williams, ED
    Blair, R
    Knight, AC
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 26 (09): : 1049 - 1049
  • [7] Patients' and personnel's perceptions of service quality and patient satisfaction in nuclear medicine
    De Man, S
    Gemmel, P
    Vlerick, P
    Dierckx, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (08): : 1150 - 1150
  • [8] Patients' and personnel's perceptions of service quality and patient satisfaction in nuclear medicine
    Stefanie De Man
    Paul Gemmel
    Peter Vlerick
    Peter Van Rijk
    Rudi Dierckx
    [J]. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2002, 29 : 1109 - 1117
  • [9] PATIENT JOURNEY AUDITS USING AN AUDIT TOOL DEVELOPED IN-HOUSE
    Pathmaraj, Kunthi
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2023, 53 : 21 - 21
  • [10] CHECKLISTS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE AND AUDIT IN NUCLEAR-MEDICINE
    WILLIAMS, ED
    HARDING, LK
    MCKILLOP, JH
    [J]. NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 1989, 10 (08) : 595 - 599