Decoupling of CO2 emissions and income in the US: A new look from EKC

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Zuyi [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Man-Keun [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Appl Econ, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Dept Agr Sci, Clemson, SC USA
关键词
CO2; emissions; Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC); Decoupling; Income growth; Panel model; Rolling-window analysis; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; RENEWABLE ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; CARBON EMISSIONS; OKUNS LAW; HYPOTHESIS; TESTS; CAUSALITY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-024-03706-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper attempts to analyze decoupling between CO2 emissions and income growth in the U.S. through the lens of Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC). Many states in the U.S. have achieved absolute decoupling in recent years, which means that CO2 emissions have decreased while the economy grows. This is partly due to the adoption of low-emission technologies, such as coal to gas switching, nuclear power, and economic restructuring towards a more sustainable economy. We argue that understanding decoupling is crucial to implement effective climate change policies. This study suggests that, after 2015, EKC has taken on the U-shaped form with many states currently located on the negatively sloped portion of the curve. It is not desirable as emissions may eventually begin to increase as the economy grows. To support this claim, we estimate panel fixed effects rolling-window EKCs using two-stage least square with two instrumental variables, unemployment rate and the trend variable. Empirical results show how the inverted U-shaped EKC has transformed into the U-shaped EKC in the U.S. This transformation is probably caused by the recent increases in emissions in transportation sector, strong electricity demand in recent years with cold winter seasons, reversals of eco-friendly energy policies, and manufacturers' onshoring. Stakeholders should make efforts to transform the U-shaped EKC back to an inverted U-shaped EKC even in cases where absolute decoupling is observed.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Do countries influence neighbouring pollution? A spatial analysis of the EKC for CO2 emissions
    Balado-Naves, Roberto
    Francisco Banos-Pino, Jose
    Mayor, Matias
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 123 : 266 - 279
  • [42] Export diversification, CO2 emissions and EKC: panel data analysis of 125 countries
    Liu, Hongbo
    Kim, Hanho
    Choe, Justin
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2019, 3 (02) : 361 - 393
  • [43] Does CO2 emissions–economic growth relationship reveal EKC in developing countries? Evidence from Kazakhstan
    Fakhri J. Hasanov
    Jeyhun I. Mikayilov
    Shahriyar Mukhtarov
    Elchin Suleymanov
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 30229 - 30241
  • [44] Comparing Decoupling and Driving Forces of CO2 Emissions in China and India
    Jiao, Ziheng
    Xing, Zhencheng
    Zhang, Guofeng
    Ma, Xiaolin
    Wang, Haikun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [45] FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCOME, TRADE, AND URBANIZATION ON CO2 EMISSIONS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM KYOTO ANNEX COUNTRIES
    Nazir, Muhammad Rizwan
    Nazir, Muhammad Imran
    Hashmi, Shujahat Haider
    Fareed, Zeeshan
    [J]. RISUS-JOURNAL ON INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 9 (03): : 17 - 37
  • [46] US about-turn on CO2 emissions
    不详
    [J]. CHEMISTRY IN BRITAIN, 1996, 32 (08) : 8 - 8
  • [47] CO2 emissions of China, US fell in 2016
    Johnson, Jeff
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2017, 95 (13) : 15 - 15
  • [48] Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013
    Kuishuang Feng
    Steven J. Davis
    Laixiang Sun
    Klaus Hubacek
    [J]. Nature Communications, 6
  • [49] Decoupling Re-Analysis of CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth From Two Dimensions
    Han, Yuling
    Liu, Yiping
    Liu, Xiao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [50] Decoupling indicators of CO2 emissions from the tourism industry in China: 1990-2012
    Tang, Zi
    Shang, Jie
    Shi, Changbo
    Liu, Zheng
    Bi, Kexin
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 46 : 390 - 397