Forecasting bitcoin volatility: exploring the potential of deep learning

被引:4
|
作者
Pratas, Tiago E. [1 ]
Ramos, Filipe R. [2 ]
Rubio, Lihki [3 ]
机构
[1] ISCTE Univ Inst Lisbon, Dept Econ, P-1649026 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, CEAUL Ctr Estat & Aplicacoes, Campo Grande 016, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Norte, Dept Math & Stat, Barranquilla 081007, Colombia
关键词
Cryptocurrencies; Bitcoin; ARCH; GARCH models; Deep learning; Forecasting; Prediction error; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; NEURAL-NETWORKS; DIRECTION; JUMPS;
D O I
10.1007/s40822-023-00232-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study aims to evaluate forecasting properties of classic methodologies (ARCH and GARCH models) in comparison with deep learning methodologies (MLP, RNN, and LSTM architectures) for predicting Bitcoin's volatility. As a new asset class with unique characteristics, Bitcoin's high volatility and structural breaks make forecasting challenging. Based on 2753 observations from 08-09-2014 to 01-05-2022, this study focuses on Bitcoin logarithmic returns. Results show that deep learning methodologies have advantages in terms of forecast quality, although significant computational costs are required. Although both MLP and RNN models produce smoother forecasts with less fluctuation, they fail to capture large spikes. The LSTM architecture, on the other hand, reacts strongly to such movements and tries to adjust its forecast accordingly. To compare forecasting accuracy at different horizons MAPE, MAE metrics are used. Diebold-Mariano tests were conducted to compare the forecast, confirming the superiority of deep learning methodologies. Overall, this study suggests that deep learning methodologies could provide a promising tool for forecasting Bitcoin returns (and therefore volatility), especially for short-term horizons.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 305
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hybrid deep learning and GARCH-family models for forecasting volatility of cryptocurrencies
    Amirshahi, Bahareh
    Lahmiri, Salim
    MACHINE LEARNING WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 12
  • [42] Exploring the potential of deep learning for streamflow forecasting: A comparative study with hydrological models for seasonal and perennial rivers
    Izadi, Ardalan
    Zarei, Nastaran
    Nikoo, Mohammad Reza
    Al-Wardy, Malik
    Yazdandoost, Farhad
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 252
  • [43] Bitcoin Market Return and Volatility Forecasting Using Transaction Network Flow Properties
    Yang, Steve Y.
    Kim, Jinhyoung
    2015 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IEEE SSCI), 2015, : 1778 - 1785
  • [44] Forecasting Bitcoin realized volatility by exploiting measurement error under model uncertainty
    Qiu, Yue
    Wang, Zongrun
    Xie, Tian
    Zhang, Xinyu
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2021, 62 : 179 - 201
  • [45] Modelling and forecasting the volatility of bitcoin futures: the role of distributional assumption in GARCH models
    Gyamerah, Samuel Asante
    Abaitey, Collins
    DATA SCIENCE IN FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 2022, 2 (03): : 321 - 334
  • [46] Exogenous drivers of Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency volatility - A mixed data sampling approach to forecasting
    Walther, Thomas
    Klein, Tony
    Bouri, Elie
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2019, 63
  • [47] The Introduction of Bitcoin Futures: An Examination of Volatility and Potential Spillover Effects
    Blau, Benjamin M.
    Whitby, Ryan J.
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2019, 39 (02): : 1030 - +
  • [48] Misperceptions of Bitcoin Volatility
    Mazur, Mieszko
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS, 2022, 24 (04): : 33 - 44
  • [49] Rough volatility of Bitcoin
    Takaishi, Tetsuya
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 32
  • [50] A Machine Learning Approach to Volatility Forecasting*
    Christensen, Kim
    Siggaard, Mathias
    Veliyev, Bezirgen
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2023, 21 (05) : 1680 - 1727