The good, the bad, and the phosphate: regulation of beneficial and detrimental plant-microbe interactions by the plant phosphate status

被引:34
|
作者
Paries, Michael [1 ]
Gutjahr, Caroline [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] TUM, TUM Sch Life Sci, Plant Genet, Emil Ramann Str 4, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Mol Plant Physiol, Muhlenberg 1, D-14476 Potsdam Golm, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
arbuscular mycorrhiza; pathogens; phosphate starvation; plant-microbe interactions; rhizosphere microbiota; root nodule symbiosis; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR PHR1; ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL SYMBIOSIS; NITROGEN LIMITATION ADAPTATION; STARVATION RESPONSE 1; LOW-PI STRESS; MEDICAGO-TRUNCATULA; PHOSPHORUS DEFICIENCY; INOSITOL PYROPHOSPHATES; ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI; MOLECULAR-MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1111/nph.18933
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Phosphate (P-i) is indispensable for life on this planet. However, for sessile land plants it is poorly accessible. Therefore, plants have developed a variety of strategies for enhanced acquisition and recycling of P-i. The mechanisms to cope with P-i limitation as well as direct uptake of P-i from the substrate via the root epidermis are regulated by a conserved P-i starvation response (PSR) system based on a family of key transcription factors (TFs) and their inhibitors. Furthermore, plants obtain P-i indirectly through symbiosis with mycorrhiza fungi, which employ their extensive hyphal network to drastically increase the soil volume that can be explored by plants for P-i. Besides mycorrhizal symbiosis, there is also a variety of other interactions with epiphytic, endophytic, and rhizospheric microbes that can indirectly or directly influence plant P-i uptake. It was recently discovered that the PSR pathway is involved in the regulation of genes that promote formation and maintenance of AM symbiosis. Furthermore, the PSR system influences plant immunity and can also be a target of microbial manipulation. It is known for decades that the nutritional status of plants influences the outcome of plant-microbe interactions. The first molecular explanations for these observations are now emerging.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 46
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Metabolomics in plant-microbe interactions in the roots
    Chen, Li
    Schwier, Melina
    Krumbach, Jenna
    Kopriva, Stanislav
    Jacoby, Richard P.
    PLANT METABOLOMICS IN FULL SWING, 2021, 98 : 133 - 161
  • [32] Transport and secretion in plant-microbe interactions
    Hueckelhoven, Ralph
    CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2007, 10 (06) : 573 - 579
  • [33] Role of Iron in Plant-Microbe Interactions
    Lemanceau, P.
    Expert, D.
    Gaymard, F.
    Bakker, P. A. H. M.
    Briat, J. -F.
    PLANT INNATE IMMUNITY, 2009, 51 : 491 - 549
  • [34] Plant-microbe interactions: tipping the balance
    Ntoukakis, Vardis
    Gifford, Miriam L.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2019, 70 (18) : 4583 - 4585
  • [35] The apoplast as battleground for plant-microbe interactions
    Du, Yu
    Stegmann, Martin
    Villamil, Johana C. Misas
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2016, 209 (01) : 34 - 38
  • [36] Plant-Microbe Interactions: Chemical Diversity in Plant Defense
    Bednarek, Pawel
    Osbourn, Anne
    SCIENCE, 2009, 324 (5928) : 746 - 748
  • [37] Defining plant growth promoting rhizobacteria molecular and biochemical networks in beneficial plant-microbe interactions
    Rosier, Amanda
    Medeiros, Flavio H. V.
    Bais, Harsh P.
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2018, 428 (1-2) : 35 - 55
  • [38] Climate Disruption of Plant-Microbe Interactions
    Rudgers, Jennifer A.
    Afkhami, Michelle E.
    Bell-Dereske, Lukas
    Chung, Y. Anny
    Crawford, Kerri M.
    Kivlin, Stephanie N.
    Mann, Michael A.
    Nunez, Martin A.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND SYSTEMATICS, VOL 51, 2020, 2020, 51 : 561 - 586
  • [39] Pectins, pectinases and plant-microbe interactions
    Prade, RA
    Zhan, DF
    Ayoubi, P
    Mort, AJ
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND GENETIC ENGINEERING REVIEWS, VOL 16, 1999, 16 : 361 - 391
  • [40] Alternative splicing in plant-microbe interactions
    Veronese, P.
    Heber, S.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 99 (06) : S165 - S165