Online peer support communities in the infertility journey: A systematic mixed-studies review

被引:6
|
作者
Lin, Jing Wen [1 ]
Shorey, Shefaly [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Nursing Div, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Alice Lee Ctr Nursing Studies, Clin Res Ctr, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Level 2,Block MD11,10 Med Dr, Singapore 117597, Singapore
关键词
Peer support; Infertility; Couples; Online support; Communities; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; INVOLUNTARY-CHILDLESSNESS; QUALITATIVE-ANALYSIS; WOMEN; INTERNET; HEALTH; FORUM; POWER; IVF;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104454
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Infertile individuals desire support, as they are highly vulnerable to multi-dimensional distress. However, support from family, friends and professionals has been found to be inadequate for their needs. Online peer support communities are avenues where infertile individuals come together virtually to share experiences and provide peer support. Though they are known to fulfil the major need of understanding and sharing experiences, little is known about their actual role in supporting individuals struggling with infertility. Objective: To systematically consolidate and explore the role of online peer support communities for infertile individuals.Design: This is a systematic mixed-studies review. Methods: Eight published and unpublished databases were screened for English studies from inception to October 2022: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus and ProQuest. Forty-nine studies were included, and quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data-based convergent qualitative (narrative and thematic) synthesis was conducted. Results: An overarching theme titled: Online peer support, a 'double-edged sword' and four themes were identified: 1) Receiving varied types of support with mutual benefits; 2) convenient and "safe haven" with diverse options for struggling couples; 3) herd mentality and negative collective emotions; and 4) credibility, confidentiality, and misinformation. The online communities were mainly utilised by couples in their late 20s to early 30s and the users were predominantly females. Online communities were mostly on forums and popular social media sites, public and unmoderated. Findings revealed that there were two-way benefits for both providers and receivers of peer support. Online communities were also found to be convenient and "safe haven" with diverse options for struggling couples. Conversely for some couples, online communities led to negative collective emotions and feelings of "unrelatedness" despite being among "similar others". Lastly, some couples raised concerns around the credibility, confidentiality, and misinformation from the online communities.Conclusions: Whilst online communities are crucial in the individuals' journey through infertility, they can act as a 'double-edged' sword if not managed by professionals. Healthcare professionals can monitor online communities to improve fertility care for individuals; advice individuals to use online communities with caution, rain peer volunteers and develop expert-moderated peer support online communities. Registration number: PROSPERO [CRD42022291461]. Tweetable abstract: Online peer-to-peer support communities may be a double-edged sword for infertile individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Unpacking older adults' experiences using mobile telepresence robots: A systematic mixed-studies review
    Yeo, Yumie
    Lau, Ying
    Ang, Wen Wei
    Wong, Qiao Fen
    Tam, Hon Lon
    Loh, Wen Liang
    Wong, Sai Ho
    Lau, Siew Tiang
    [J]. GERIATRIC NURSING, 2023, 54 : 280 - 301
  • [22] Barriers and Facilitators of Robot-Assisted Education in Higher Education: A Systematic Mixed-Studies Review
    Hui Shan Chou
    Lay Teng Thong
    Han Shi Jocelyn Chew
    Ying Lau
    [J]. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2023, 28 : 477 - 516
  • [23] Barriers and Facilitators of Robot-Assisted Education in Higher Education: A Systematic Mixed-Studies Review
    Chou, Hui Shan
    Thong, Lay Teng
    Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn
    Lau, Ying
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE AND LEARNING, 2023, 28 (02) : 477 - 516
  • [24] Use of telelactation interventions to improve breastfeeding outcomes among mothers: A mixed-studies systematic review
    Chua, Crystal Min Siu
    Mathews, Jancy
    Ong, Mabel Sor Boh
    Liew, Kelly Kaili
    Shorey, Shefaly
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2023, 36 (03) : 247 - 256
  • [25] Online Peer-to-Peer Support for Young People With Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review
    Ali, Kathina
    Farrer, Louise
    Gulliver, Amelia
    Griffiths, Kathleen M.
    [J]. JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2015, 2 (02):
  • [26] Content and characteristics of evidence in the use of standardized patients for advanced practice nurses: A mixed-studies systematic review
    Chua, Crystal Min Siu
    Nantsupawat, Apiradee
    Wichaikhum, Orn-Anong
    Shorey, Shefaly
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2023, 120
  • [27] Online Peer-to-Peer Communities in the Daily Lives of People With Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Systematic Review
    Kingod, Natasja
    Cleal, Bryan
    Wahlberg, Ayo
    Husted, Gitte R.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2017, 27 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [28] Impact of interprofessional education on empathy of pre-licensure healthcare students: A mixed-studies systematic review
    Chua, Ting Xuan Jolene
    Lopez, Violeta
    Chua, Qi Wen Cheryl
    Lau, Siew Tiang
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 143
  • [29] The effect of explosive remnants of war on global public health: a systematic mixed-studies review using narrative synthesis
    Frost, Alexandra
    Boyle, Peter
    Autier, Philippe
    King, Colin
    Zwijnenburg, Wim
    Hewitson, David
    Sullivan, Richard
    [J]. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 2 (06): : E286 - E296
  • [30] Performance-enhancing and health-compromising behaviors in youth sports: A systematic mixed-studies review
    Kristensen, Jan Age
    Skilbred, Anette
    Abrahamsen, Frank E.
    Ommundsen, Yngvar
    Loland, Sigmund
    [J]. PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT & HEALTH, 2022, 10 (04)