Online peer support communities in the infertility journey: A systematic mixed-studies review

被引:6
|
作者
Lin, Jing Wen [1 ]
Shorey, Shefaly [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Nursing Div, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Alice Lee Ctr Nursing Studies, Clin Res Ctr, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Level 2,Block MD11,10 Med Dr, Singapore 117597, Singapore
关键词
Peer support; Infertility; Couples; Online support; Communities; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; INVOLUNTARY-CHILDLESSNESS; QUALITATIVE-ANALYSIS; WOMEN; INTERNET; HEALTH; FORUM; POWER; IVF;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104454
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Infertile individuals desire support, as they are highly vulnerable to multi-dimensional distress. However, support from family, friends and professionals has been found to be inadequate for their needs. Online peer support communities are avenues where infertile individuals come together virtually to share experiences and provide peer support. Though they are known to fulfil the major need of understanding and sharing experiences, little is known about their actual role in supporting individuals struggling with infertility. Objective: To systematically consolidate and explore the role of online peer support communities for infertile individuals.Design: This is a systematic mixed-studies review. Methods: Eight published and unpublished databases were screened for English studies from inception to October 2022: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus and ProQuest. Forty-nine studies were included, and quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data-based convergent qualitative (narrative and thematic) synthesis was conducted. Results: An overarching theme titled: Online peer support, a 'double-edged sword' and four themes were identified: 1) Receiving varied types of support with mutual benefits; 2) convenient and "safe haven" with diverse options for struggling couples; 3) herd mentality and negative collective emotions; and 4) credibility, confidentiality, and misinformation. The online communities were mainly utilised by couples in their late 20s to early 30s and the users were predominantly females. Online communities were mostly on forums and popular social media sites, public and unmoderated. Findings revealed that there were two-way benefits for both providers and receivers of peer support. Online communities were also found to be convenient and "safe haven" with diverse options for struggling couples. Conversely for some couples, online communities led to negative collective emotions and feelings of "unrelatedness" despite being among "similar others". Lastly, some couples raised concerns around the credibility, confidentiality, and misinformation from the online communities.Conclusions: Whilst online communities are crucial in the individuals' journey through infertility, they can act as a 'double-edged' sword if not managed by professionals. Healthcare professionals can monitor online communities to improve fertility care for individuals; advice individuals to use online communities with caution, rain peer volunteers and develop expert-moderated peer support online communities. Registration number: PROSPERO [CRD42022291461]. Tweetable abstract: Online peer-to-peer support communities may be a double-edged sword for infertile individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Autobiographical memory of war veterans: A mixed-studies systematic review
    Islam, Azharul
    Sheppard, Elizabeth
    Conway, Martin A.
    Haque, Shamsul
    [J]. MEMORY STUDIES, 2021, 14 (02) : 214 - 239
  • [2] Impact and experiences of delayed discharge: A mixed-studies systematic review
    Rojas-Garcia, Antonio
    Turner, Simon
    Pizzo, Elena
    Hudson, Emma
    Thomas, James
    Raine, Rosalind
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2018, 21 (01) : 41 - 56
  • [3] A Systematic Mixed-Studies Review of Hope Experiences in Parents of Children With Cancer
    Eche, Ijeoma Julie
    Eche, Ifeoma Mary
    Pires, Conceicao
    Isibor, Christopher
    Achibiri, Amaka
    Aronowitz, Teri
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2022, 45 (01) : E43 - E58
  • [4] THE APPLICATION OF TIME BANKING IN ELDERLY CARING: A MIXED-STUDIES SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Ding, Hui
    Li, Hui-Ling
    [J]. INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 636 - 636
  • [5] The influence of social media on student nurses: A systematic mixed-studies review
    Tan, Michelle Yan Ni
    Ni, Zhao
    Liu, Abielle Shao Hua
    Shorey, Shefaly
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 132
  • [6] Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions
    Eysenbach, G
    Powell, J
    Englesakis, M
    Rizo, C
    Stern, A
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7449): : 1166 - 1170A
  • [7] Crowdsourcing citation-screening in a mixed-studies systematic review: a feasibility study
    Noel-Storr, Anna H.
    Redmond, Patrick
    Lame, Guillaume
    Liberati, Elisa
    Kelly, Sarah
    Miller, Lucy
    Dooley, Gordon
    Paterson, Andy
    Burt, Jenni
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01) : 88
  • [8] Crowdsourcing citation-screening in a mixed-studies systematic review: a feasibility study
    Anna H. Noel-Storr
    Patrick Redmond
    Guillaume Lamé
    Elisa Liberati
    Sarah Kelly
    Lucy Miller
    Gordon Dooley
    Andy Paterson
    Jenni Burt
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21
  • [9] Effect of Parenting Style on Adolescents' Sexual Behavior: A Mixed-Studies Systematic Review presented by
    Kim, BoRam
    Kim, BoRam
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 70 (03) : E87 - E87
  • [10] Psychosocial Risk Factors for Overuse Injuries in Competitive Athletes: A Mixed-Studies Systematic Review
    Ulrika Tranaeus
    Simon Martin
    Andreas Ivarsson
    [J]. Sports Medicine, 2022, 52 : 773 - 788