Streamlined benefit analysis of products based on the Sustainable Development Goals: Integrating the voice of society into life cycle sustainability assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Moeller, Martin [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Griesshammer, Rainer [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Oko Inst EV, Inst Appl Ecol, Sustainable Prod & Mat Flows Div, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Cluster Excellence LivMatS, FIT Freiburg Ctr Interact Mat & Bioinspired Techno, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg, Fac Environm & Nat Resources, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Oeko Inst EV, Merzhauser Str 173, D-79100 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
benefit analysis; industrial ecology; life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA); socio-economic analysis; Stage-Gate process; Sustainable Development Goals; DESIGN THINKING; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.13464
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conducting benefit analyses used to be a controversial endeavor. In the absence of a consistent normative framework, indicators had to be determined on a case-by-case basis, requiring time-consuming stakeholder workshops. The 2030 Agenda provided the missing normative basis to enable the inclusion of benefit aspects in life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA). However, given the 17 Sustainable Development Goals and their 169 targets, it has remained unclear which of these targets relate to products and services and should therefore be used as indicators in benefit analyses. Against this background, this paper presents a consistent and well-defined indicator framework for product-related benefit analyses, developed through a detailed alignment with the 2030 Agenda and comprising a set of 30 indicators. It also describes how benefit analysis can be integrated into the LCSA methodology to provide a sound, evidence-based framework for research and policy making: First, it outlines a sustainability self-assessment tool for corporate researchers and designers, embedded in a Stage-Gate process as a "voice-of-society" perspective. Second, it discusses approaches to improve regulatory impact assessment for policy making, particularly in the area of chemicals management. An illustrative case study shows how the developed benefit indicators can address current shortcomings in socio-economic analysis methodology, such as an unbalanced focus on the economic impacts and insufficient information on human and environmental impacts. Despite its limitations, such as the inherent focus on societal benefits and existing "blind spots" in the 2030 Agenda, the indicator set has the potential to enrich LCSA studies with previously neglected aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 409
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Integrating sustainability assessment tools with life cycle analysis for agroecological systems: A UK case study
    Westaway, Sally
    Zylowski, Tomasz
    Hardiman, Sam
    Smith, Laurence G.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 219
  • [22] Forestry based products as climate change solution: Integrating life cycle assessment with techno-economic analysis
    Vazifeh, Zahra
    Bensebaa, Farid
    Shadbahr, Jalil
    Gonzales-Calienes, Giovanna
    Mafakheri, Fereshteh
    Benali, Marzouk
    Ebadian, Mahmood
    Vezina, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 330
  • [23] Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: The case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology
    Matos, Stelvia
    Hall, Jeremy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2007, 25 (06) : 1083 - 1102
  • [24] Environmental and social life cycle assessment to enhance sustainability of sugarcane-based products in Thailand
    Prasara-A, Jittima
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    Silalertruksa, Thapat
    Pongpat, Patcharaporn
    Sawaengsak, Wanchat
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2019, 21 (07) : 1447 - 1458
  • [25] Environmental and social life cycle assessment to enhance sustainability of sugarcane-based products in Thailand
    Jittima Prasara-A
    Shabbir H. Gheewala
    Thapat Silalertruksa
    Patcharaporn Pongpat
    Wanchat Sawaengsak
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2019, 21 : 1447 - 1458
  • [26] A Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment-Based Decision-Analysis Framework
    Hannouf, Marwa
    Assefa, Getachew
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (11)
  • [27] Determining the Contributions in a Denim Fabric Production for Sustainable Development Goals: Life Cycle Assessment and Material Input Approaches
    Sari, Bulent
    Zarifi, Farhad
    Alhasan, Muhammed
    Guney, Hakan
    Turkes, Selman
    Sirlibas, Serdal
    Yigit, Deniz Civan
    Kilincceker, Gueray
    Sahin, Besir
    Keskinkan, Olcayto
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [28] End-of-Life alternatives for wind turbine blades: Sustainability Indices based on the UN sustainable development goals
    Deeney, Peter
    Nagle, Angela J.
    Gough, Fergal
    Lemmertz, Heloisa
    Delaney, Emma L.
    McKinley, Jennifer M.
    Graham, Conor
    Leahy, Paul G.
    Dunphy, Niall P.
    Mullally, Gerard
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 171
  • [29] Big Data Analytics-based life cycle sustainability assessment for sustainable manufacturing enterprises evaluation
    Tamym, Lahcen
    Benyoucef, Lyes
    Moh, Ahmed Nait Sidi
    El Ouadghiri, Moulay Driss
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIG DATA, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [30] Big Data Analytics-based life cycle sustainability assessment for sustainable manufacturing enterprises evaluation
    Lahcen Tamym
    Lyes Benyoucef
    Ahmed Nait Sidi Moh
    Moulay Driss El Ouadghiri
    [J]. Journal of Big Data, 10