Streamlined benefit analysis of products based on the Sustainable Development Goals: Integrating the voice of society into life cycle sustainability assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Moeller, Martin [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Griesshammer, Rainer [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Oko Inst EV, Inst Appl Ecol, Sustainable Prod & Mat Flows Div, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Cluster Excellence LivMatS, FIT Freiburg Ctr Interact Mat & Bioinspired Techno, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg, Fac Environm & Nat Resources, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Oeko Inst EV, Merzhauser Str 173, D-79100 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
benefit analysis; industrial ecology; life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA); socio-economic analysis; Stage-Gate process; Sustainable Development Goals; DESIGN THINKING; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.13464
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conducting benefit analyses used to be a controversial endeavor. In the absence of a consistent normative framework, indicators had to be determined on a case-by-case basis, requiring time-consuming stakeholder workshops. The 2030 Agenda provided the missing normative basis to enable the inclusion of benefit aspects in life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA). However, given the 17 Sustainable Development Goals and their 169 targets, it has remained unclear which of these targets relate to products and services and should therefore be used as indicators in benefit analyses. Against this background, this paper presents a consistent and well-defined indicator framework for product-related benefit analyses, developed through a detailed alignment with the 2030 Agenda and comprising a set of 30 indicators. It also describes how benefit analysis can be integrated into the LCSA methodology to provide a sound, evidence-based framework for research and policy making: First, it outlines a sustainability self-assessment tool for corporate researchers and designers, embedded in a Stage-Gate process as a "voice-of-society" perspective. Second, it discusses approaches to improve regulatory impact assessment for policy making, particularly in the area of chemicals management. An illustrative case study shows how the developed benefit indicators can address current shortcomings in socio-economic analysis methodology, such as an unbalanced focus on the economic impacts and insufficient information on human and environmental impacts. Despite its limitations, such as the inherent focus on societal benefits and existing "blind spots" in the 2030 Agenda, the indicator set has the potential to enrich LCSA studies with previously neglected aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 409
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle sustainability assessment for sustainable development goals
    Yao, Yuan
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    Feng, Haibo
    Arodudu, Oludunsin
    Gloria, Thomas P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2024, 28 (06) : 1347 - 1354
  • [2] Sustainable development goals as a guideline for indicator selection in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
    Wulf, Christina
    Werker, Jasmin
    Zapp, Petra
    Schreiber, Andrea
    Schloer, Holger
    Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm
    [J]. 25TH CIRP LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE) CONFERENCE, 2018, 69 : 59 - 65
  • [3] Contributions to the sustainable development goals in life cycle sustainability assessment: Insights from the Handprint research project
    Michael Kühnen
    Samanthi Silva
    Janpeter Beckmann
    Ulrike Eberle
    Rüdiger Hahn
    Christoph Hermann
    Stefan Schaltegger
    Marianne Schmid
    [J]. NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, 2019, 27 (1): : 65 - 82
  • [4] Methodological framework to find links between life cycle sustainability assessment categories and the UN Sustainable Development Goals based on literature
    Hannouf, Marwa B.
    Padilla-Rivera, Alejandro
    Assefa, Getachew
    Gates, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2023, 27 (03) : 707 - 725
  • [5] Addressing sustainable development goals in life cycle sustainable assessment: Synergies, challenges and needs
    Cordella, Mauro
    Horn, Rafael
    Hong, Sun Hea
    Bianchi, Marco
    Isasa, Marina
    Harmens, Rosan
    Sonderegger, Thomas
    Pihkola, Hanna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 415
  • [6] Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis
    Heijungs, Reinout
    Huppes, Gjalt
    Guinee, Jeroen B.
    [J]. POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY, 2010, 95 (03) : 422 - 428
  • [7] Integrating sustainable development goals into environment impact assessment in India: A conceptual analysis
    Vannadil, Preetha Kizhakkekara
    Prasanna, Chitra Karunakaran
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (06) : 3993 - 4006
  • [8] Using Social Life Cycle Assessment to analyze the contribution of products to the Sustainable Development Goals: a case study in the textile sector
    Herrera Almanza, Ana Maria
    Corona, Blanca
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (09): : 1833 - 1845
  • [9] Using Social Life Cycle Assessment to analyze the contribution of products to the Sustainable Development Goals: a case study in the textile sector
    Ana María Herrera Almanza
    Blanca Corona
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 1833 - 1845
  • [10] Integrating life-cycle assessment into transport cost-benefit analysis
    Manzo, Stefano
    Salling, Kim Bang
    [J]. TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016, 2016, 14 : 273 - 282