Effects of decentralization on firm performance: Evidence from Chinese county-level quasi-experiments

被引:8
|
作者
Jin, Haizhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Techno Management Res Inst, Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, KAIST Bldg N22-203, 291 Daehak-ro, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Administrative decentralization; China; Firm ownership; Fiscal decentralization; Performance; ECONOMIC-GROWTH EVIDENCE; FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; FEDERALISM; GOVERNMENT; REFORM; EDUCATION; MARKET; PROFITABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106116
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
How does decentralization affect enterprises at a microeconomic level? While many studies have identified decentralization's implications for macroeconomic outcomes, little is known about its impact on firms. This study applies county-level quasi-experiments of decentralization reforms in China to investigate the impact of decentralization on firm performance and its variance by type of decentralization and firm. Using firm-level data from 2003 to 2013, this study finds that administrative reform significantly improves firm performance by reducing costs and increasing profits. When implemented alone, however, fiscal reform has only an auxiliary effect and increases firm debt; the two reforms are complementary. Moreover, administrative reform has the greatest positive impact on private firms, with a smaller effect on foreign firms and a negative effect on state firms, due to economic needs. Fiscal reform has a greater negative impact on SOEs (state-owned enterprises) than on non-SOEs due to political closeness.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Growth of regional economy and income inequality: county-level evidence from Florida, USA
    Kim, J
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2004, 36 (02) : 173 - 183
  • [22] Direct Food Sales in the United States: Evidence from State and County-Level Data
    Timmons, David
    Wang, Qingbin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2010, 34 (02): : 229 - 240
  • [23] GROWTH AND CONVERGENCE ACROSS CROATIA: EVIDENCE FROM COUNTY-LEVEL DATA EXTENDED ABSTRACT
    Sergo, Zdravko
    [J]. GLOBAL CHALLENGES FOR COMPETITIVENESS: BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE, 2007, : 24 - 26
  • [24] Spatial Disparities in Access to Healthcare Professionals in Sichuan: Evidence from County-Level Data
    Zhang, Ning
    Ning, Wei
    Xie, Tao
    Liu, Jinlin
    He, Rongxin
    Zhu, Bin
    Mao, Ying
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [25] Effect of fiscal decentralization on pollution reduction: Firm-level evidence from China
    Jiang, Weijie
    Li, Yidong
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 129
  • [26] Sigma convergence versus beta convergence: Evidence from US county-level data
    Young, Andrew T.
    Higgins, Matthew J.
    Levy, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2008, 40 (05) : 1083 - 1093
  • [27] COVID-19 and housing prices: evidence from US county-level data
    Yilmazkuday, Hakan
    [J]. REVIEW OF REGIONAL RESEARCH-JAHRBUCH FUR REGIONALWISSENSCHAFT, 2023, 43 (02): : 241 - 263
  • [28] Determinants of efficiency growth of county-level public hospitals-evidence from Chongqing, China
    Jing Liu
    Beibei He
    Xiaolan Xu
    Leming Zhou
    Jiang Li
    Gongru Wang
    Yingyao Chen
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [29] County-Level Economic Changes and Drug Mortality in the United States: Evidence from the Great Recession
    Kim, Yeonwoo
    Cano, Manuel
    Oh, Sehun
    Betz, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (23)
  • [30] The impact of the pollution permits system on green innovation: Evidence from the county-level data in China
    Ren, Kai
    Kong, Yusheng
    Zhang, Tongjian
    Sun, Huaping
    Zhu, Naiping
    Liu, Fengqin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 344