ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in comparison to standard-of-care (SOC) anticoagulants in the management and prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in pediatric populations.MethodsA comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published between January 1, 2015, and December 18, 2022. A meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the effect of DOACs on clinically significant endpoints, employing trial-level data with harmonized endpoint definitions. The primary outcome was venous thromboembolism (VTE). Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The study was registered with INPLASY (2022120065).ResultsThree studies encompassing 934 subjects were included. The incidence of VTE was reduced in patients administered DOACs compared to those on SOC anticoagulants (OR 0.41 [95% CI 0.19-0.93], I-2 = 0%, P = 0.03). No significant differences were observed between the DOAC and SOC groups in all-cause mortality (OR 0.50 [95% CI 0.07-3.59], I-2 = 0%, P = 0.35) or serious adverse events (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.50-1.12], I-2 = 0%, P = 0.16). The risk of major bleeding (OR 0.50 [95% CI 0.13-1.87], I-2 = 44%, P = 0.30) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 1.23 [95% CI 0.50-3.00], I-2 = 0%, P = 0.65) exhibited no significant differences between the groups.ConclusionsDOACs are associated with a reduced risk of VTE in pediatric patients without increasing the risk of bleeding, all-cause mortality, or serious adverse events when compared to SOC anticoagulants. DOACs may be an alternative for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events in the pediatrics.