Simple Summary Low-grade gliomas are slow-growing, progressive tumors of the brain that invariably become high grade. They present a challenging entity because they can invade normal brain without many changes on radiologic scans. Standard treatment involves maximal safe removal via surgery, then close monitoring or other treatments, depending on whether portions were left. Some authors recommend removing a larger area of the brain than can be seen as tumor on imaging (called supratotal resection) because it theoretically gives patients a potential for longer disease-free survival. However, removing the adjacent "normal" brain carries the risk of neurological harm, which has tempered widespread adoption of the supratotal technique in lieu of preserving patients' function. In this review, literature surrounding supratotal resection is explored systematically, and while there are no randomized trials, some evidence may suggest that supratotal resection is safe and effective as standard resection. Further studies are required to fully answer this question. Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are optimally treated with up-front maximal safe surgical resection, typically defined as maximizing the extent of tumor resection while minimizing neurologic risks of surgery. Supratotal resection of LGG may improve outcomes beyond gross total resection by removing tumor cells invading beyond the tumor border as defined on MRI. However, the evidence regarding supratotal resection of LGG, in terms of impact on clinical outcomes, such as overall survival and neurologic morbidities, remains unclear. Authors independently searched the PubMed, Medline, Ovid, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google Scholar databases for studies evaluating overall survival, time to progression, seizure outcomes, and postoperative neurologic and medical complications of supratotal resection/FLAIRectomy of WHO-defined LGGs. Papers in languages other than English, lacking full-text availability, evaluating supratotal resection of WHO-defined high-grade gliomas only, and nonhuman studies were excluded. After literature search, reference screening, and initial exclusions, 65 studies were screened for relevancy, of which 23 were evaluated via full-text review, and 10 were ultimately included in the final evidence review. Studies were evaluated for quality using the MINORS criteria. After data extraction, a total of 1301 LGG patients were included in the analysis, with 377 (29.0%) undergoing supratotal resection. The main measured outcomes were extent of resection, pre- and postoperative neurological deficits, seizure control, adjuvant treatment, neuropsychological outcomes, ability to return to work, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Overall, low- to moderate-quality evidence was supportive of aggressive, functional boundary-based resection of LGGs due to improvements in progression-free survival and seizure control. The published literature provides a moderate amount of low-quality evidence supporting supratotal surgical resection along functional boundaries for low-grade glioma. Among patients included in this analysis, the occurrence of postoperative neurological deficits was low, and nearly all patients recovered within 3 to 6 months after surgery. Notably, the surgical centers represented in this analysis have significant experience in glioma surgery in general, and supratotal resection specifically. In this setting, supratotal surgical resection along functional boundaries appears to be appropriate for both symptomatic and asymptomatic low-grade glioma patients. Larger clinical studies are needed to better define the role of supratotal resection in LGG.
