Study on the influence of input variables on the supervised machine learning model for landslide susceptibility mapping

被引:0
|
作者
Lai, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Fei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Xiaohu [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Dongwei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Li [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Guangfu [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Minist Educ, Key Lab Geol Hazards Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Yichang 443002, Peoples R China
[2] China Three Gorges Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Yichang 443002, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Geosci, Badong Natl Observat & Res Stn Geohazards, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[4] China Geol Survey, Cent South China Innovat Ctr Geosci, Wuhan Ctr, Wuhan 430205, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Landslide susceptibility; Input variables; Supervised machine learning models; Frequency ratio; Neighborhood frequency ratio; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; FREQUENCY RATIO; RANDOM SUBSPACE; FOREST; BASIN; AREA; TREE; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-024-11501-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Supervised machine learning (ML) models are currently popular in landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM). However, the input variables of these models have some inherent limitations in terms of the lack of nonlinear relationship between the raw input variables and landslides, and the loss of a significant amount of information induced by the demand of the discretization of continuous environmental factors for the discrete and frequency ratio values input variables. Therefore, to address these issues, a new method of neighborhood frequency ratio for obtaining input variables was adopted in this paper. The present study compared the results of four input variables and seven supervised ML models under 28 conditions, with the use of ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves as evaluation methods for the prediction results. The AUC (area under curve) values, ranging from 0.8223 to 0.9928, shows that the input variables are very important to the evaluation model. The experimental results were analyzed from the perspective of algorithm principles and data characteristics. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) for the non-tree models (i.e., models other than tree models), neighborhood frequency ratio of environmental factors should be used as the model inputs. (2) For tree models (i.e., decision trees and the decision tree based integrated models), the raw values of environmental factors can be used directly as the model inputs of the LSM model. (3) The decision tree based integrated models yielded better prediction results.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Remote Sensing Data
    Hussain, Muhammad Afaq
    Chen, Zhanlong
    Zheng, Ying
    Zhou, Yulong
    Daud, Hamza
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [42] Integration of hard and soft supervised machine learning for flood susceptibility mapping
    Andaryani, Soghra
    Nourani, Vahid
    Haghighi, Ali Torabi
    Keesstra, Saskia
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 291
  • [43] Submarine landslide susceptibility assessment integrating frequency ratio with supervised machine learning approach
    Meng, Xiangshuai
    Liu, Xiaolei
    Wang, Yueying
    Zhang, Hong
    Guo, Xingsen
    APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2024, 153
  • [44] Study on the Uncertainty of Machine Learning Model for Earthquake-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Assessment
    Feng, Haixia
    Miao, Zelang
    Hu, Qingwu
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [45] Large-Scale Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using an Integrated Machine Learning Model: A Case Study in the Lvliang Mountains of China
    Xing, Yin
    Yue, Jianping
    Guo, Zizheng
    Chen, Yang
    Hu, Jia
    Trave, Anna
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [46] Application of Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Kadavi, Prima Riza
    Lee, Chang-Wook
    Lee, Saro
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [47] Combining spatial response features and machine learning classifiers for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Wei, Ruilong
    Ye, Chengming
    Sui, Tianbo
    Ge, Yonggang
    Li, Yao
    Li, Jonathan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2022, 107
  • [48] Novel GIS Based Machine Learning Algorithms for Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Soliamani, Karim
    Habibnejhad, Mahmood
    Kavian, Ataollah
    Chapi, Kamran
    Shahabi, Himan
    Chen, Wei
    Khosravi, Khabat
    Binh Thai Pham
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Ahmad, Anuar
    Bin Ahmad, Baharin
    Dieu Tien Bui
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (11)
  • [49] Improving Spatial Agreement in Machine Learning-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Adnan, Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani
    Rahman, Md Salman
    Ahmed, Nahian
    Ahmed, Bayes
    Rabbi, Md. Fazleh
    Rahman, Rashedur M.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (20) : 1 - 23
  • [50] Exploring Complementary Models Consisting of Machine Learning Algorithms for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Hu, Han
    Wang, Changming
    Liang, Zhu
    Gao, Ruiyuan
    Li, Bailong
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2021, 10 (10)