Impact of Computational Modeling on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure Efficiency and Outcomes

被引:25
|
作者
De Backer, Ole [1 ,11 ]
Iriart, Xavier [2 ]
Kefer, Joelle [3 ]
Nielsen-Kudsk, Jens Erik [4 ]
Aminian, Adel [5 ]
Rosseel, Liesbeth [6 ]
Kofoed, Klaus Fuglsang [1 ]
Odenstedt, Jacob [7 ]
Berti, Sergio [8 ]
Saw, Jacqueline [9 ]
Sondergaard, Lars [1 ]
Garot, Philippe [10 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Bordeaux Univ Hosp, Fdn Bordeaux Univ, Bordeaux, France
[3] Clin Univ St Luc, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Ctr Hosp Univ Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
[6] Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
[7] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[8] Fdn CNR Reg Toscana, Massa, Italy
[9] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[10] Hop Jacques Cartier, Inst Cardiovasc Paris Sud, Ramsay Sante, Massy, France
[11] Rigshosp, Heart Ctr, Inge Lehmannsvej 7, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
cardiac computed tomography; computational modeling; left atrial appendage closure; randomized controlled trial; simulations; CARDIAC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; FIBRILLATION; WARFARIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2023.01.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND When performing transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure, peridevice leaks and device -related thrombus (DRT) have been associated with worse clinical outcomes-hence, their risk should be mitigated.OBJECTIVES The authors sought to assess whether use of preprocedural computational modeling impacts procedural efficiency and outcomes of transcatheter LAA closure.METHODS The PREDICT-LAA trial (NCT04180605) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial in which 200 patients were 1:1 randomized to standard planning vs cardiac computed tomography (CT) simulation-based planning of LAA closure with Amplatzer Amulet. The artificial intelligence-enabled CT-based anatomical analyses and computer simulations were provided by FEops (Belgium).RESULTS All patients had a preprocedural cardiac CT, 197 patients underwent LAA closure, and 181 of these patients had a postprocedural CT scan (standard, n = 91; CT + simulation, n = 90). The composite primary endpoint, defined as contrast leakage distal of the Amulet lobe and/or presence of DRT, was observed in 41.8% in the standard group vs 28.9% in the CT + simulation group (relative risk [RR]: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.46-1.04; P = 0.08). Complete LAA closure with no residual leak and no disc retraction into the LAA was observed in 44.0% vs 61.1%, respectively (RR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.05-1.98; P = 0.03). In addition, use of computer simulations resulted in improved procedural efficiency with use of fewer Amulet devices (103 vs 118; P < 0.001) and fewer device repositionings (104 vs 195; P < 0.001) in the CT + simulation group.CONCLUSIONS The PREDICT-LAA trial demonstrates the possible added value of artificial intelligence-enabled, CT-based computational modeling when planning for transcatheter LAA closure, leading to improved procedural efficiency and a trend toward better procedural outcomes. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:655-666) (c) 2023 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 666
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Left atrial appendage closure: a percutaneous transcatheter approach for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
    Landmesser, Ulf
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (06) : 698 - 704
  • [32] Left atrial appendage closure
    Singh I.M.
    Holmes Jr. D.R.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2010, 12 (5) : 413 - 421
  • [33] Left Atrial Appendage Closure
    Lin, Albert C.
    Knight, Bradley P.
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2015, 58 (02) : 195 - 201
  • [34] LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE
    Bertog, S.
    Vaskelyte, L.
    Hofmann, I.
    Lam, S.
    Gafoor, S.
    Wiebe, J.
    Sievert, H.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 125 : 247 - 247
  • [35] Left Atrial Appendage and Closure
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Reddy, Vivek Y.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (05)
  • [36] Impact of Frailty on Hospital- Related Outcomes of Elective Left Atrial Appendage Closure
    Li, Weijia
    Rios, Saul
    Wu, Lingling
    Jin, Chengyue
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [37] Sex differences in outcomes of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure
    Ryuzaki, S.
    Kondo, Y.
    Nakano, M. .
    Nakano, M.
    Kajiyama, T.
    Ito, R.
    Chiba, T.
    Yoshino, Y.
    Komai, Y.
    Takanashi, Y.
    Kobayashi, Y.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [38] Sex Differences in Outcomes Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure
    Sanjoy, Shubrandu S.
    Choi, Yun-Hee
    Sparrow, Robert T.
    Baron, Suzanne J.
    Abbott, J. Dawn
    Azzalini, Lorenzo
    Holmes, David R.
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    Tzemos, Nikolaos
    Ayan, Diana
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Bagur, Rodrigo
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 96 (07) : 1845 - 1860
  • [39] Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Procedural Techniques and Outcomes
    Saw, Jacqueline
    Lempereur, Mathieu
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (11) : 1205 - 1220
  • [40] Outcomes of Elderly Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure
    Sanjoy, Shubrandu S.
    Choi, Yun-Hee
    Sparrow, Robert T.
    Jneid, Hani
    Abbott, J. Dawn
    Nombela-Franco, Luis
    Azzalini, Lorenzo
    Holmes, David R.
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Baranchuk, Adrian
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Bagur, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (19):