Evaluation of alternative marine fuels from dual perspectives considering multiple vessel sizes

被引:29
|
作者
Zou, Jiahui [1 ]
Yang, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Inst Logist Sci & Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Alternative fuel; Vessel size; Emission reduction; Climate change mitigation; Environmental and economic assessment; GREENHOUSE-GAS; NATURAL-GAS; ECA REGULATIONS; NOX REDUCTION; DIESEL-ENGINE; LIFE-CYCLE; EMISSIONS; COST; TECHNOLOGIES; HYDROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2022.103583
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The environmental problems brought by the shipping industry have drawn the attention of all parties, making it critical to select a fuel system that combines economic and environmental benefits when ordering new ships. This paper narrows down a list of fuels to four high-potential options: LNG, methanol, hydrogen, and ammonia. Based on the dual perspectives of shipowners and the public, this study takes different-sized ships as the object, establishes mathematical models throughout their life cycle, and selects a variety of indicators to evaluate alternative fuels. The findings demonstrate that, in the short term, heavy fuel oil with scrubbers is the most economically advantageous option for all sizes of container ships, but methanol is a desirable alternative when taking into account the social cost of pollutants. Hydrogen might be the ultimate fuel to reduce emissions in the long run when the price gap closes.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] A following model considering multiple vehicles from the driver's front and rear perspectives
    Qi, Weiwei
    Wang, Wenyi
    Fu, Chuanyun
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2024, 655
  • [22] Atomization Characteristics of Camelina-Based Alternative Aviation Fuels Discharging From Dual-Orifice Injector
    Sivakumar, D.
    Sakthikumar, R.
    Raghunandan, B. N.
    Hu, John T. C.
    Puri, S. K.
    Jain, A. K.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2015, 137 (08):
  • [23] Supply Reliability Evaluation Considering Value of Lost Load derived from Customers' Perspectives
    Hashimoto A.
    Isogawa D.
    Ohashi H.
    Noda S.
    Yamashita T.
    Kibata H.
    Anai T.
    IEEJ Transactions on Power and Energy, 2024, 144 (02) : 79 - 90
  • [24] Large group decision-making (LGDM) with the participators from multiple subgroups of stakeholders: A method considering both the collective evaluation and the fairness of the alternative
    Liu, Yang
    Fan, Zhi-Ping
    You, Tian-Hui
    Zhang, Wei-Yu
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 122 : 262 - 272
  • [25] Evaluation of semiarid grassland degradation in North China from multiple perspectives
    Han, Dongmei
    Wang, Guoqiang
    Xue, Baolin
    Liu, Tingxi
    Yinglan, A.
    Xu, Xinyi
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 112 : 41 - 50
  • [26] Evaluation of energetic-exergetic and sustainability parameters of biodiesel fuels produced from palm oil and opium poppy oil as alternative fuels in diesel engines
    Sanli, Bengi Gozmen
    Uludamar, Erinc
    Ozcanli, Mustafa
    FUEL, 2019, 258
  • [27] Harmonization and Categorization of Metrics and Criteria for Evaluation of Recommender Systems in Healthcare From Dual Perspectives
    Afolabi, Adekunle Oluseyi
    Toivanen, Pekka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-HEALTH AND MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01) : 69 - 92
  • [28] Potential measurement error from vessel reflex and multiple light paths in dual-wavelength retinal oximetry
    Beach, James M.
    Shoemaker, Benjamin
    Eckert, George J.
    Harris, Alon
    Siesky, Brent
    Arciero, Julia C.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2024, 102 (03) : e367 - e380
  • [29] Measures of joint venture performance from multiple perspectives: An evaluation by local and foreign managers in Vietnam
    Büchel B.
    Thuy L.X.
    Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2001, 18 (1) : 101 - 111
  • [30] The implications of coteaching/cogenerative dialogue for teacher evaluation: Learning from multiple perspectives of everyday practice
    Roth W.-M.
    Tobin K.
    Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2001, 15 (1): : 7 - 29