Stress-Strength Modeling Using Median-Ranked Set Sampling: Estimation, Simulation, and Application

被引:16
|
作者
Hassan, Amal S. S. [1 ]
Almanjahie, Ibrahim M. M. [2 ]
Al-Omari, Amer Ibrahim [3 ]
Alzoubi, Loai [3 ]
Nagy, Heba Fathy [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Grad Studies Stat Res, Giza 12613, Egypt
[2] King Khalid Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Math, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
[3] Al Albayt Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Math, Mafraq 25113, Jordan
关键词
Lomax and inverse Lomax distributions; stress-strength model; maximum likelihood method; median ranked set sample; RELIABILITY; P(Y-LESS-THAN-X); DISTRIBUTIONS;
D O I
10.3390/math11020318
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In this study, we look at how to estimate stress-strength reliability models, R-1 = P (Y < X) and R-2 = P (Y < X), where the strength X and stress Y have the same distribution in the first model, R-1, and strength X and stress Z have different distributions in the second model, R-2. Based on the first model, the stress Y and strength X are assumed to have the Lomax distributions, whereas, in the second model, X and Z are assumed to have both the Lomax and inverse Lomax distributions, respectively. With the assumption that the variables in both models are independent, the median-ranked set sampling (MRSS) strategy is used to look at different possibilities. Using the maximum likelihood technique and an MRSS design, we derive the reliability estimators for both models when the strength and stress variables have a similar or dissimilar set size. The simulation study is used to verify the accuracy of various estimates. In most cases, the simulation results show that the reliability estimates for the second model are more efficient than those for the first model in the case of dissimilar set sizes. However, with identical set sizes, the reliability estimates for the first model are more efficient than the equivalent estimates for the second model. Medical data are used for further illustration, allowing the theoretical conclusions to be verified.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimation of bivariate characteristics using ranked set sampling
    Al-Saleh, MF
    Zheng, G
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2002, 44 (02) : 221 - 232
  • [42] Bayesian estimation of stress-strength reliability for two-parameter bathtub-shaped lifetime distribution based on maximum ranked set sampling with unequal samples
    Basikhasteh, Mehdi
    Lak, Fazlollah
    Afshari, Mahmoud
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2020, 90 (16) : 2975 - 2990
  • [43] Estimation of the population mean by successive use of an auxiliary variable in median ranked set sampling
    Shahzad, Usman
    Ahmad, Ishfaq
    Oral, Evrim
    Hanif, Muhammad
    Almanjahie, Ibrahim Mufrah
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL POPULATION STUDIES, 2021, 28 (03) : 176 - 199
  • [44] Improved Ratio Estimation of Population Mean under Median and Neoteric Ranked Set Sampling
    Koyuncu, Nursel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2016 (ICNAAM-2016), 2017, 1863
  • [45] Estimation of Distribution Function Using Percentile Ranked Set Sampling
    Sevil, Yusuf Can
    Yildiz, Tugba Ozkal
    [J]. REVSTAT-STATISTICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 21 (01) : 39 - 62
  • [46] Density estimation using ranked-set sampling data
    Chen, ZH
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 1999, 6 (02) : 135 - 146
  • [47] Nonparametric overlap coefficient estimation using ranked set sampling
    Helu, Amal
    Samawi, Hani
    Vogel, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS, 2011, 23 (02) : 385 - 397
  • [48] Estimation of average milk yield using ranked set sampling
    Al-Saleh, MF
    Al-Shrafat, K
    [J]. ENVIRONMETRICS, 2001, 12 (04) : 395 - 399
  • [49] Density estimation using ranked-set sampling data
    Zehua Chen
    [J]. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 1999, 6 : 135 - 146
  • [50] Mean Estimation Using Even Order Ranked Set Sampling
    Noor-ul-Amin, Muhammad
    Tayyab, Muhammad
    Hanif, Muhammad
    [J]. PUNJAB UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 2019, 51 (01): : 91 - 99