Patient and Clinician Recommendations to Improve Communication and Understanding of Lung Cancer Screening Results

被引:7
|
作者
Crothers, Kristina [1 ,2 ]
Shahrir, Shahida [2 ,4 ]
Kross, Erin K. [2 ,5 ]
Kava, Christine M. [4 ]
Cole, Allison [3 ]
Wenger, David [7 ]
Triplette, Matthew [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] VA Puget Sound Healthcare Syst, Div Pulm, Crit Care & Sleep Med, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Syst & Populat Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA USA
[5] UW Med, Cambia Palliat Care Ctr Excellence, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Fred Hutchinson Canc Ctr, Clin Res Div, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Evergreen Healthcare, Div Pulm & Crit Care, Kirkland, WA USA
关键词
communication; low-dose CT scan; lung cancer screening; shared decision-making; ADHERENCE; QUESTIONS; VETERANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2022.09.038
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patient understanding of chest low-dose CT (LDCT) scan results for lung cancer screening (LCS) may impact outcomes.RESEARCH QUESTION: What are patient-and clinician-identified gaps in understanding and communication of LCS results and how might communication be improved through a patient-oriented tool?STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods study of participants recruited from a multisite LCS program to understand knowledge gaps after receiving LCS results and to guide development of a commonly asked questions (CAQ) after LCS information sheet. Initial patient surveys assessed understanding and reactions to LCS results (n = 190). We then conducted patient interviews and focus group discussions (n = 31) to understand experiences receiving LDCT scan results and reactions to results letters and the proposed CAQ; we also interviewed clinicians (n = 6) for feedback on these resources. We summarized survey re-sponses and used thematic analysis to identify major themes in focus groups and interviews.RESULTS: Of 190 survey respondents (43% response rate), although 88% agreed that they "understood" their LCS results, only 55% reported understanding what a lung nodule is. Approximately two-thirds thought it was "very important" to receive more information regarding lung nodules and incidental lung and heart disease. In interviews and focus groups, although patients believed that brief results letters for normal LDCT scan results generally were acceptable, most found letters explaining abnormal LDCT scan and incidental findings to be concerning and not a substitute for discussion with their clinician. Nearly all patients expressed that the CAQ sheet provided helpful information on nodules, results reporting and incidental findings, and helped them form questions to ask their clinicians.INTERPRETATION: We identified patient-reported information needs regarding LCS results and developed a CAQ information sheet that was refined with patient and clinician input. The CAQ may represent a simple and feasible way to improve LCS results reporting and to augment clinician-patient discussions. CHEST 2023; 163(3):707-718
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 718
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lung Cancer Screening and USPSTF Recommendations
    Darden, Michael E.
    Hoagland, Alex
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2025, 8 (02)
  • [22] Use of telehealth to improve lung cancer screening program delivery of results
    Barbosa Dos Santos, Ludmila Pereira
    Vazquez, Fabiana Lima
    Leal, Leticia Ferro
    Miziara, Jose Elias
    Souto Ferraz, Mauricio Wagner
    Serrano, Sergio Vicente
    Da Conceicao, Carolina Lourenco
    Petiquer Capucho, Bianca De Bortoli
    Chiarantano, Rodrigo Sampaio
    Vieira Reis, Rui Manuel
    Stanfoca Casagrande, Giovanna Maria
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62
  • [23] "What Is Shared Decision Making?" A Qualitative Study of Clinician Communication in Lung Cancer Screening Programs
    Melzer, A. C.
    Golden, S. E.
    Miranda, L.
    Ono, S.
    Slatore, C. G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197
  • [24] Cancer screening: Videos to improve understanding
    不详
    BRITISH COLUMBIA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 57 (05):
  • [25] BREAST-CANCER SCREENING RESULTS AS VIEWED BY THE CLINICIAN
    SMART, CR
    BEAHRS, OH
    CANCER, 1979, 43 (03) : 851 - 856
  • [26] Survey results of lung cancer screening patient experiences and satisfaction.
    Reyes, Monica E.
    Perez-Morales, Jaileene
    Pathak, Rashmi
    Sulbaran, Ada
    Gillard, Tiffany J.
    Tolbert, Haley
    Tirbene, Rajwantee
    Gray, Jhanelle
    Simmons, Vani N.
    Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
    Schabath, Matthew B.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 81 (13)
  • [27] Patient Identification of Lung Cancer Screening Follow-Up Recommendations and the Association with Adherence
    Triplette, Matthew
    Wenger, David S.
    Shahrir, Shahida
    Kross, Erin K.
    Kava, Christine
    Phipps, Amanda
    Hawes, Stephen E.
    Cole, Allison
    Snidarich, Madison
    Crothers, Kristina
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2022, 19 (05) : 799 - 806
  • [28] Understanding Patient Barriers to Utilization of Low Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening
    Dako, F.
    Erkmen, C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (11) : S1813 - S1813
  • [29] Lung cancer screening in the gulf: Rationale and recommendations
    Bennji, Sami M.
    Jayakrishnan, B.
    Al-Kindi, Adil H.
    Al-Jahdhami, Issa
    Al-Hashami, Zamzam
    ANNALS OF THORACIC MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (04) : 189 - 192
  • [30] Recommendations for lung cancer screening in Southern Africa
    Koegelenberg, Coenraad F. N.
    Dorfman, Shane
    Schewitz, Ivan
    Richards, Guy A.
    Maasdorp, Shaun
    Smith, Clifford
    Dheda, Keertan
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 (09) : 3696 - 3703