Patient and Clinician Recommendations to Improve Communication and Understanding of Lung Cancer Screening Results

被引:7
|
作者
Crothers, Kristina [1 ,2 ]
Shahrir, Shahida [2 ,4 ]
Kross, Erin K. [2 ,5 ]
Kava, Christine M. [4 ]
Cole, Allison [3 ]
Wenger, David [7 ]
Triplette, Matthew [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] VA Puget Sound Healthcare Syst, Div Pulm, Crit Care & Sleep Med, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Syst & Populat Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA USA
[5] UW Med, Cambia Palliat Care Ctr Excellence, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Fred Hutchinson Canc Ctr, Clin Res Div, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Evergreen Healthcare, Div Pulm & Crit Care, Kirkland, WA USA
关键词
communication; low-dose CT scan; lung cancer screening; shared decision-making; ADHERENCE; QUESTIONS; VETERANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2022.09.038
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patient understanding of chest low-dose CT (LDCT) scan results for lung cancer screening (LCS) may impact outcomes.RESEARCH QUESTION: What are patient-and clinician-identified gaps in understanding and communication of LCS results and how might communication be improved through a patient-oriented tool?STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods study of participants recruited from a multisite LCS program to understand knowledge gaps after receiving LCS results and to guide development of a commonly asked questions (CAQ) after LCS information sheet. Initial patient surveys assessed understanding and reactions to LCS results (n = 190). We then conducted patient interviews and focus group discussions (n = 31) to understand experiences receiving LDCT scan results and reactions to results letters and the proposed CAQ; we also interviewed clinicians (n = 6) for feedback on these resources. We summarized survey re-sponses and used thematic analysis to identify major themes in focus groups and interviews.RESULTS: Of 190 survey respondents (43% response rate), although 88% agreed that they "understood" their LCS results, only 55% reported understanding what a lung nodule is. Approximately two-thirds thought it was "very important" to receive more information regarding lung nodules and incidental lung and heart disease. In interviews and focus groups, although patients believed that brief results letters for normal LDCT scan results generally were acceptable, most found letters explaining abnormal LDCT scan and incidental findings to be concerning and not a substitute for discussion with their clinician. Nearly all patients expressed that the CAQ sheet provided helpful information on nodules, results reporting and incidental findings, and helped them form questions to ask their clinicians.INTERPRETATION: We identified patient-reported information needs regarding LCS results and developed a CAQ information sheet that was refined with patient and clinician input. The CAQ may represent a simple and feasible way to improve LCS results reporting and to augment clinician-patient discussions. CHEST 2023; 163(3):707-718
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 718
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient Experiences and Recommendations to Improve Communication of Lung Cancer Screening Results
    Triplette, M.
    Kross, E. K.
    Kava, C.
    Wenger, D.
    Shahrir, S.
    Cole, A.
    Crothers, K. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [2] Patient vs Clinician Perspectives on Communication About Results of Lung Cancer Screening A Qualitative Study
    Wiener, Renda Soylemez
    Clark, Jack A.
    Koppelman, Elisa
    Bolton, Rendelle
    Fix, Gemmae M.
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    Kathuria, Hasmeena
    CHEST, 2020, 158 (03) : 1240 - 1249
  • [3] LUNG CANCER SCREENING AND SMOKING CESSATION READINESS: ROLE OF PATIENT-CLINICIAN COMMUNICATION IN DIFFERING TYPES OF LUNG CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMS
    DeSalvo, Janel
    Schweiger, Liana
    Melzer, Anne
    Davis, James
    Slatore, Christopher
    CHEST, 2020, 158 (04) : 2375A - 2375A
  • [4] Patient, Clinician, and Communication Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Krist, Alex H.
    Hochheimer, Camille J.
    Sabo, Roy T.
    Puro, Jon
    Peele, Eric
    Lail-Kashiri, Paulette
    Vernon, Sally W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (05) : 779 - 784
  • [5] Implementation of policy recommendations for shared decision-making about lung cancer screening: patient and clinician perspectives
    Wiener, Renda
    Kathuria, Hasmeena
    Koppelman, Elisa
    Bolton, Rendelle
    Lasser, Karen
    Borrelli, Belinda
    Slatore, Christopher
    Au, David
    Clark, Jack
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 13
  • [6] Implementation of policy recommendations for shared decision-making about lung cancer screening: patient and clinician perspectives
    Wiener, Renda
    Kathuria, Hasmeena
    Koppelman, Elisa
    Bolton, Rendelle
    Lasser, Karen
    Borrelli, Belinda
    Slatore, Christopher
    Au, David
    Clark, Jack
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [7] Understanding the influences and impact of patient-clinician communication in cancer care
    Lafata, Jennifer Elston
    Shay, Laura A.
    Winship, Jodi M.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (06) : 1385 - 1392
  • [8] How to improve patient communication with a clinician (HIPCC).
    Riggs, Gail Kershner
    Lisse, Jeffrey R.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2006, 54 (09): : S510 - S510
  • [9] Practice, clinician, and patient factors associated with the adoption of lung cancer screening
    Hochheimer, Camille J.
    Sabo, Roy T.
    Tong, Sebastian T.
    Westfall, Matthew
    Wolver, Susan E.
    Carney, Stacie
    Day, Teresa
    Krist, Alex H.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2021, 28 (02) : 158 - 162
  • [10] PROVIDER RECOMMENDATIONS AND LUNG CANCER SCREENING - PATIENT PREDICTORS AND IMPLICATIONS
    DeWitt, Jeff
    Leishman, Joseph
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Caverly, Tanner
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (01) : E138 - E139