Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Orthopaedic Implant Removal: What Does the Evidence Say?

被引:0
|
作者
Rather, Imran Ibni Gani [1 ]
Shafiq, Nusrat [1 ]
Pandey, Avaneesh Kumar [1 ]
Bhandari, Ritika Kondel [1 ]
Malhotra, Samir [1 ]
Chouhan, Devinder Kumar [2 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Pharmacol, Chandigarh, India
[2] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Orthopaed, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Antibiotic prophylaxis; orthopaedic implant; surgical site infection; superficial surgical site infection; deep-seated surgical site infection; fractures; INFECTIONS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.2174/1574886317666220429081207
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Orthopaedic implant removal is considered a sterile procedure, but the current literature suggests it is associated with around a 20% Surgical Site Infection (SSI) rate. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis is still ambiguous and contentious. Taking into consideration this issue we conducted a meta-analysis for the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopaedic implant removal surgery. Objectives To determine whether or not antibiotic prophylaxis benefits orthopaedic implant removal surgeries. Methods Electronic and printed sources were searched up to February 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using antibiotic prophylaxis and a control group. Data from eligible studies were pooled for the following outcomes: overall, superficial, and deep surgical site infection (SSI). Pooled odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Mantel Haenszel fixed-effect model preferentially. Results Two studies, including 766 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was not statistically significant between the studies. There was no significant difference in the incidence of overall SSI in cefazolin and normal saline (NS) groups (Pooled OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.53-1.17). In subgroup analysis, antibiotic prophylaxis showed statistically significant improvement for deep SSI (Pooled OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.70). Conclusion Overall incidence of SSI is not reduced after the administration of antibiotic prophylaxis one hour before removal of orthopaedic implants.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 120
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hypersensitivity to orthopaedic implant manifested as erythroderma: Timing of implant removal
    Phedy, Phedy
    Djaja, Yoshi P.
    Boedijono, Dimas R.
    Wahyudi, Muhammad
    Silitonga, Jamot
    Solichin, Iman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2018, 49 : 110 - 114
  • [42] Compliance with electronic prescribing of antibiotic prophylaxis on orthopaedic lists
    Sarens, N.
    Bluhm, S.
    Dhanasekar, B.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 75 : 28 - 28
  • [43] THE ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS OF BONE AND JOINT INFECTIONS IN ORTHOPAEDIC OPERATIONS
    BINGHAM, R
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1963, 45 (03): : 658 - 658
  • [44] TARGETING ABDOMINAL OBESITY THROUGH THE DIET What Does the Evidence Say?
    Pilolla, Kari D.
    ACSMS HEALTH & FITNESS JOURNAL, 2018, 22 (05) : 21 - 28
  • [45] Vertical transmission of Covid-19. What does the evidence say?
    Poblete A, Carolina
    Bancalari M, Aldo
    ANDES PEDIATRICA, 2021, 92 (05): : 790 - 797
  • [46] Acyclovir and chickenpox in healthy children: what does evidence have to say?
    T, Colaco
    Santo, Espirito M.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (33-34) : 154S - 154S
  • [47] Comparing Active and Passive Learning: What Does the Evidence Really Say?
    Willett, Laura Rees
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2017, 92 (05) : 573 - 573
  • [48] What does the evidence really say about acupuncture for IBS? response
    Hickner, John
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2015, 64 (11): : 686 - 686
  • [49] REDUCING THE RISKS OF SUBSTANCE USE IN PREGNANCY: WHAT DOES THE EVIDENCE SAY?
    Taplin, Stephanie
    Mcarthur, Morag
    Richmond, Giovanna
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2014, 33 : 57 - 58
  • [50] Interventions to prevent self-harm: what does the evidence say?
    Saunders, Kate E.
    Smith, Katharine A.
    EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : 69 - 72