The prognosis value of CONUT and SIS score for recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with second-line immunotherapy

被引:3
|
作者
Zhao, Xiao-Han [1 ]
Shen, Wen-Bin [1 ]
Wang, Duo [2 ]
Wang, He-Song [1 ]
Song, Chun-Yang [1 ]
Deng, Wen-Zhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Radiat Oncol, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Hebei Key Lab Anim Physiol Biochem & Mol Biol, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; second-line treatment; immune checkpoint inhibitors; controlling nutritional status; systemic inflammation score; prognosis; SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATION SCORE; CANCER-PATIENTS; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; CAMRELIZUMAB; THERAPY; CHINA;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1167625
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo investigate the predictive value of Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and systemic inflammation (SIS) score in the prognosis, short-term efficacy, and immune-related side effects of patient with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (R/M ESCC) receiving immunotherapy as second line therapy combined with or without radiotherapy. MethodsForty-eight patients with R/M ESCC who received second-line therapy with Camrelizumab were retrospectively studied. They were divided into the high and low score groups according to the CONUT and SIS score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze factors that might affect patient prognosis and the effects of different CONUT score and SIS on the short-term efficacy and immune-related toxic and side effects of patients. ResultsThe 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 42.9% and 22.5%, and 29.0% and 5.8%, respectively. The CONUT score ranged from 0 to 6 (3.31 & PLUSMN; 1.43), whereas the SIS score ranged from 0 to 2 (1.19 & PLUSMN; 0.73). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment related toxicity, number of cycles of Camrelizumab used, short-term effect and SIS score were independent prognostic factors for OS (P=0.044, 0.021, 0.021, 0.030, respectively), whereas SIS and CONUT scores were independent prognostic factors for PFS (P=0.005, 0.047, respectively). Patients with low CONUT/SIS score had a low incidence rate of immune-related adverse reactions (X(2 = )9.735, 5.693; P=0.002, 0.017) and better short-term efficacy (X(2 = )4.427, 7.438; P=0.035, 0.006). ConclusionR/M ESCC patients with low CONUT/SIS score have better prognosis, higher objective response rate, lower incidence of immune-related toxic and side effects after receiving immunotherapy as second-line therapy. CONUT scores and SIS scores may be reliable prognostic indicators for patient receiving immunotherapy as second-line therapy for R/M ESCC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients Receiving Second-Line Therapy for Advanced/Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Pranav Abraham
    Joe Gricar
    Ying Zhang
    Veena Shankaran
    Advances in Therapy, 2020, 37 : 3392 - 3403
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of apatinib with or without radiotherapy as second-line or beyond therapy in patients with advanced/recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Lv, Jiahua
    Li, Tao
    Wang, Qifeng
    Fan, Yu
    Wang, Junchao
    Lang, Jinyi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [23] Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients Receiving Second-Line Therapy for Advanced/Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Abraham, Pranav
    Gricar, Joe
    Zhang, Ying
    Shankaran, Veena
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2020, 37 (07) : 3392 - 3403
  • [24] Second-line systemic therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma
    Kadowaki, Shigenori
    Nakazawa, Taiko
    Ogata, Takatsugu
    Matsubara, Yuki
    Nozawa, Kazuki
    Kato, Kyoko
    Narita, Yukiya
    Honda, Kazunori
    Masuishi, Toshiki
    Bando, Hideaki
    Ando, Masashi
    Hanai, Nobuhiro
    Muro, Kei
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S312 - S312
  • [25] Benefit of second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a tri-center propensity score analysis
    Muller, Moritz
    Posch, Florian
    Kiem, Dominik
    Barth, Dominik
    Horvath, Lena
    Stotz, Michael
    Schaberl-Moser, Renate
    Pichler, Martin
    Greil, Richard
    Jost, Philipp J.
    Seeber, Andreas
    Amann, Arno
    Schlick, Konstantin
    Gerger, Armin
    Riedl, Jakob M.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 13
  • [26] PRISM: Phase 2 trial with panitumumab monotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
    Rischin, Danny
    Spigel, David R.
    Adkins, Douglas
    Wein, Richard
    Arnold, Susanne
    Singhal, Nimit
    Lee, Oliver
    Murugappan, Swami
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2016, 38 : E1756 - E1761
  • [27] Economic evaluation of tislelizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China
    Shi, Fenghao
    He, Zixuan
    Su, Hang
    Wang, Lin
    Han, Sheng
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [28] COST EFFECTIVENESS OF TISLELIZUMAB VERSUS CHEMOTHERAPY AS SECOND-LINE TREATMENT FOR ADVANCED OR METASTATIC ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA IN CHINA
    Hao, S.
    Han, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S136 - S136
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness analysis of camrelizumab in the second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China
    Yang, Fan
    Fu, Yu
    Kumar, Arun
    Chen, Mingsheng
    Si, Lei
    Rojanasarot, Sirikan
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (15)
  • [30] Evaluation of systemic second-line therapy in recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer
    Bacinschi, Xenia E.
    Zgura, Anca
    Stanuica, Monica, I
    Iliescu, Laura
    Anghel, Rodica M.
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MILITARY MEDICINE, 2021, 124 (02) : 203 - 210