The prognosis value of CONUT and SIS score for recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with second-line immunotherapy

被引:3
|
作者
Zhao, Xiao-Han [1 ]
Shen, Wen-Bin [1 ]
Wang, Duo [2 ]
Wang, He-Song [1 ]
Song, Chun-Yang [1 ]
Deng, Wen-Zhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Radiat Oncol, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Hebei Key Lab Anim Physiol Biochem & Mol Biol, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; second-line treatment; immune checkpoint inhibitors; controlling nutritional status; systemic inflammation score; prognosis; SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATION SCORE; CANCER-PATIENTS; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; CAMRELIZUMAB; THERAPY; CHINA;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1167625
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo investigate the predictive value of Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and systemic inflammation (SIS) score in the prognosis, short-term efficacy, and immune-related side effects of patient with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (R/M ESCC) receiving immunotherapy as second line therapy combined with or without radiotherapy. MethodsForty-eight patients with R/M ESCC who received second-line therapy with Camrelizumab were retrospectively studied. They were divided into the high and low score groups according to the CONUT and SIS score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze factors that might affect patient prognosis and the effects of different CONUT score and SIS on the short-term efficacy and immune-related toxic and side effects of patients. ResultsThe 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 42.9% and 22.5%, and 29.0% and 5.8%, respectively. The CONUT score ranged from 0 to 6 (3.31 & PLUSMN; 1.43), whereas the SIS score ranged from 0 to 2 (1.19 & PLUSMN; 0.73). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment related toxicity, number of cycles of Camrelizumab used, short-term effect and SIS score were independent prognostic factors for OS (P=0.044, 0.021, 0.021, 0.030, respectively), whereas SIS and CONUT scores were independent prognostic factors for PFS (P=0.005, 0.047, respectively). Patients with low CONUT/SIS score had a low incidence rate of immune-related adverse reactions (X(2 = )9.735, 5.693; P=0.002, 0.017) and better short-term efficacy (X(2 = )4.427, 7.438; P=0.035, 0.006). ConclusionR/M ESCC patients with low CONUT/SIS score have better prognosis, higher objective response rate, lower incidence of immune-related toxic and side effects after receiving immunotherapy as second-line therapy. CONUT scores and SIS scores may be reliable prognostic indicators for patient receiving immunotherapy as second-line therapy for R/M ESCC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The prognosis value of CONUT and SIS score for recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with second-line immunotherapy (vol 13, 1167625, 2023)
    Zhao, Xiao-Han
    Shen, Wen-Bin
    Wang, Duo
    Wang, He-Song
    Song, Chun-Yang
    Deng, Wen-Zhao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [2] Prognostic Value of Lactate Dehydrogenase in Second-Line Immunotherapy for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Li, Yan
    Wang, Kunlun
    Zhao, Erjiang
    Li, Bingxu
    Li, Shenglei
    Dong, Xiaotao
    Yuan, Ling
    Yang, Hui
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 28
  • [3] First-line versus second-line immunotherapy in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
    Even, C.
    Torossian, N.
    Ibrahim, T.
    Martin, N.
    Badis, L. Mayache
    Ferrand, F. R.
    Iacob, M.
    Guigay, J.
    Le Tourneau, C.
    Daste, A.
    Saada-Bouzid, E.
    Saleh, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [4] Comparison of second-line treatments of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
    El Rassy, Elie
    Assi, Tarek
    Bakouny, Ziad
    El Karak, Fadi
    Pavlidis, Nicholas
    Ghosn, Marwan
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 (08) : 909 - 924
  • [5] Second-Line Combination Chemotherapy with Docetaxel and Nedaplatin for Cisplatin-Pretreated Refractory Metastatic/Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Jin, Jianhua
    Xu, Xiyuan
    Wang, Fang
    Yan, Guodu
    Liu, Jianyue
    Lu, Wenbin
    Li, Xianwen
    Tucker, Steven Jay
    Zhong, Baoliang
    Cao, Zhigang
    Wang, Daoyuan
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4 (08) : 1017 - 1021
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy as second-line treatment for locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Gu, Yinfang
    Zou, Xiaofang
    Zhu, Junlin
    Wu, Guowu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [7] Cetuximab plus pemetrexed as second-line therapy for fluorouracil-based pre-treated metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Jing Tian
    Ming Shang
    Sheng-Bin Shi
    Yong Han
    Jun Xu
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2015, 76 : 829 - 834
  • [8] Cetuximab plus pemetrexed as second-line therapy for fluorouracil-based pre-treated metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Tian, Jing
    Shang, Ming
    Shi, Sheng-Bin
    Han, Yong
    Xu, Jun
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 76 (04) : 829 - 834
  • [9] A global perspective in second-line treatment patterns for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Jaffe, Dena H.
    Gricar, Joseph
    DeCongelio, Marc
    Mackie, DeMauri S.
    THORACIC CANCER, 2022, 13 (09) : 1240 - 1257
  • [10] Economic evaluation of second-line treatment for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review
    Kaur, G.
    Rai, P.
    Singh, B.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S1476 - S1476