Do Online Ads Sway Voters? Understanding the Persuasiveness of Online Political Ads

被引:0
|
作者
Chu, Xiaotong [1 ,2 ]
Vliegenthart, Rens [2 ]
Otto, Lukas [3 ]
Lecheler, Sophie [4 ]
de Vreese, Claes [1 ]
Kruikemeier, Sanne [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Strateg Commun Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] GESIS, Computat Social Sci, Mannheim, Germany
[4] Univ Vienna, Polit Commun Res Grp, Vienna, Austria
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Online political ads; propensity to vote; vote choice; new party; political knowledge; online privacy literacy; browser tracking; panel survey; FACEBOOK; TURNOUT;
D O I
10.1080/10584609.2023.2276104
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study investigates the effect of online political ads on party preference, and whether this effect is more pronounced for newer political parties and voters who are less politically knowledgeable and literate regarding online privacy. A mixed-method approach, combining Facebook browser tracking data and a four-wave panel survey, was adopted during the 2021 Dutch General Election campaign. The results showed that the number of political ads received from a specific party has a positive effect on both the propensity and choice to vote for that party. In addition, people with less political knowledge and online privacy literacy are more likely to be persuaded by online political ads. However, at the party level, there is no evidence indicating that the effect of political ads on party preference is stronger for new parties than for established parties. Overall, this study shows that voters can be persuaded via the frequency of exposure to online political ads, but the extent to which they are affected can vary.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 314
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Online Behavioral Targeting Debate Continues-Ads May Not
    Poole, Kate
    [J]. ECONTENT, 2009, 32 (07) : 16 - 17
  • [32] Click efficiency: a unified optimal ranking for online Ads and documents
    Raju Balakrishnan
    Subbarao Kambhampati
    [J]. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 2016, 46 : 531 - 562
  • [33] Fighting Online Click-Fraud Using Bluff Ads
    Haddadi, Hamed
    [J]. ACM SIGCOMM COMPUTER COMMUNICATION REVIEW, 2010, 40 (02) : 22 - 25
  • [34] The Value of Online Users: Empirical Evaluation of the Price of Personalized Ads
    Marciel, Miriam
    Gonzalez, Jose
    Kassa, Yonas Mitike
    Gonzalez, Roberto
    Ahmed, Mohamed
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AVAILABILITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY, (ARES 2016), 2016, : 694 - 700
  • [35] Online job ads in Italy: a regional analysis of ICT professionals
    Kahlawi, Adham
    Buzzigoli, Lucia
    Giambona, Francesca
    Grassini, Laura
    Martelli, Cristina
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 33 (02): : 609 - 633
  • [36] Online Advertising for Cancer Prevention: Google Ads and Tanning Beds
    Serrano, Wilmarie Cidre
    Chren, Mary-Margaret
    Resneck, Jack S., Jr.
    Aji, Nepheli N.
    Pagoto, Sherry
    Linos, Eleni
    [J]. JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 152 (01) : 101 - 102
  • [37] Online program engagement and audience size during television ads
    Beth L. Fossen
    Alexander Bleier
    [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2021, 49 : 743 - 761
  • [38] Drug ads move online, creating a web of regulatory challenges
    Wadman, Meredith
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2010, 16 (01) : 22 - 22
  • [39] Pricing risk in prostitution: Evidence from online sex ads
    Gregory DeAngelo
    Jacob N. Shapiro
    Jeffrey Borowitz
    Michael Cafarella
    Christopher Ré
    Gary Shiffman
    [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2019, 59 : 281 - 305
  • [40] Click efficiency: a unified optimal ranking for online Ads and documents
    Balakrishnan, Raju
    Kambhampati, Subbarao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2016, 46 (03) : 531 - 562