Environmental regulation and corporate employment revisited: New quasi-natural experimental evidence from China's new environmental protection law

被引:20
|
作者
Liao, Tianlong [1 ]
Liu, Guanchun [1 ]
Liu, Yuanyuan [2 ]
Lu, Rui [3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Lingnan Coll, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Finance & Southern China Inst Fortune Manageme, Guangzhou 510420, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat sen Univ, Sch Business, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Corporate employment; Liquidity constraints; China; LABOR DEMAND EVIDENCE; TRADE CREDIT; COLLATERAL MENUS; RISK-MANAGEMENT; AIR; COST; INVESTMENT; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106802
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates how environmental regulation affects corporate hiring decisions. Using the enactment of China's New Environmental Protection Law in 2015 as an exogenously regulatory shock, we run a difference-indifferences regression to identify causality. The results show that stricter environmental regulation significantly reduces corporate employment by approximately 5.1% on average. This negative effect is stronger for firms with greater liquidity constraints, worse environmental performance, higher labor intensity, more severe labor market frictions, and regions under stricter law enforcement. In addition, the mechanism tests reveal that stricter environmental regulation conduces to higher environmental risks, less debt financing, and higher liquidity constraints, which is consistent with the financial constraints channel. Overall, the government should take the employment destruction effect of environmental regulation seriously, especially during periods of climate warming and the coronavirus disease pandemic.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firm Exports: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China
    Zhang, Guanglai
    Liao, Wenmei
    Ren, Yayun
    Yu, Yantuan
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2023, 59 (02) : 363 - 375
  • [32] Environmental regulation and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Chen, Jing
    Liu, Xinghe
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 88 : 1513 - 1528
  • [33] Can Environmental Regulation Improve Labor Allocation Efficiency? Evidence from China's New Environmental Protection Law
    Gu, Ran
    He, Zenghua
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [34] Environmental judicial independence and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Yu, Lianchao
    Sha, Haobin
    Liu, Qiang
    Yan, Guowan
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 96
  • [35] Tax enforcement and corporate employment: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Liu, Guanchun
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Chengsi
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 73
  • [36] External governance pressure and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Liu, Qiang
    Yu, Lianchao
    Yan, Guowan
    Guo, Yu
    BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY, 2023, 32 (01): : 74 - 93
  • [37] The effectiveness of China's environmental information disclosure at the corporate level: Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Zhang, Qian
    Chen, Wanying
    Feng, Yanchao
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 164
  • [38] Biodiversity conservation and corporate environmental information disclosure: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Chen, Yinying
    Yin, Liang
    Hu, Shiyang
    Li, Xiang
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 102
  • [39] Environmental regulation and firms' performance: a quasi-natural experiment from China
    Li, Juan
    Zhao, Min
    Yang, Yien
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF POPULATION RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 17 (03) : 278 - 294
  • [40] Environmental regulation and corporate R&D investment-evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Huang, Jingchang
    Zhao, Jing
    Cao, June
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 72 : 154 - 174