Environmental implications of offshore oil and gas decommissioning options: an eco-efficiency assessment approach

被引:2
|
作者
Janjua, Shahana Y.
Khan, Muhammad R.
机构
关键词
Environment; Ecoefficiency; Oil and gas; Offshore; Decommissioning; INFRASTRUCTURE; FISH; FACILITIES;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-022-02595-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the tremendous rise of aged offshore oil and gas (O&G) facilities, the world is on the horizon of a decommissioning dilemma. In addition to higher cost consumption, decommissioning offshore O&G platforms is an energy-intensive process and results in the production of huge waste on dry land. Few studies have been undertaken to assess and compare the environmental impacts of various decommissioning options, but economic barriers and data gaps have confronted the virtue of these studies. A holistic framework to assess the environmental and economic implications and identify the best decommissioning option is the need of the hour which can give clarity of selection to stakeholders of the offshore O&G decommissioning industry. This study aims to develop an eco-efficiency framework, by integrating environmental life cycle assessment and life cycle costing, to assess the environmental and economic impacts of the decommissioning process of offshore O&G platforms. A comparative study of four decommissioning options is carried out to determine the best decommissioning option for a specific offshore O&G platform. The study indicated that the use of vessels in the decommissioning process is the major contributor to the environmental impacts and costs. This framework helps the decision-makers to select cost-effective options which can reduce the environmental impacts and result in the reduction in resource exploitation.
引用
收藏
页码:12915 / 12944
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Oil & Gas UK launches UKCS decommissioning options
    Izundu, Uchenna
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2007, 105 (40) : 30 - +
  • [42] DOMESTIC OPTIONS TO OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS
    KASH, DE
    OCEANUS, 1983, 26 (03) : 46 - 51
  • [43] The use of eco-efficiency indicators by environmental frontrunner companies
    Heras-Saizarbitoria, Inaki
    Garcia, Maria
    Boiral, Olivier
    Diaz de Junguitu, Alberto
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 115
  • [44] Assessing the environmental-hazard potential for life cycle assessment, eco-efficiency and SEEbalance®
    Saling, P
    Maisch, R
    Silvani, M
    König, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2005, 10 (05): : 364 - 371
  • [45] Eco-Efficiency Assessment of Japanese Municipalities Based on Environmental Impacts and Gross Regional Product
    Yamasaki, Junya
    Ikaga, Toshiharu
    Itsubo, Norihiro
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (15)
  • [46] Structural eco-efficiency: harmonising structural and environmental assessments
    Gervasio, Helena
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (07) : 2463 - 2474
  • [47] Eco-efficiency Assessment of Chinese Petrochemical Enterprises: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach
    Wang, Yanqiu
    Yao, Lixia
    Cui, Shengnan
    Zhu, Zhiwei
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 33 (06) : 1160 - 1180
  • [48] Regulatory impact of environmental standards on the eco-efficiency of firms
    Bremberger, Christoph
    Bremberger, Francisca
    Luptacik, Mikulas
    Schmitt, Stephan
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2015, 66 (03) : 421 - 433
  • [49] A Frontier Approach to Eco-Efficiency Assessment in the World's Busiest Sea Ports
    Bulak, Muhammet Enis
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [50] The eco-efficiency of rapeseed and sunflower cultivation in Italy. Joining environmental and economic assessment
    Forleo, Maria Bonaventura
    Palmieri, Nadia
    Suardi, Alessandro
    Coaloa, Domenico
    Pari, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 3138 - 3153