Towards a Framework for Functional Representation of Spatial Relations

被引:0
|
作者
Skilter, Jurgis [1 ]
Zarina, Liga [1 ]
Glanzberg, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Latvia, Fac Comp, Lab Perceptual & Cognit Syst, Raina Blvd 19, Riga, Latvia
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Philosophy, New Brunswick, NJ USA
来源
BALTIC JOURNAL OF MODERN COMPUTING | 2024年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
functional relations; locational control; support; qualitative spatial relations; extensions of RCC; CONNECTION; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.22364/bjmc.2024.12.1.02
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Although human perception is geometrically constrained, not all geometric relations are equally prominent and not all geometric relations are used in everyday settings in human perception. Further, some geometric relations are systematically transformed. In this study we describe a robust geometric framework expressing spatial relations but including some strong and systematic non -geometric extensions that operate in human perception. We generally adopt the view that spatial cognition centers on qualitative spatial relations, including geometrical and topological but also functional ones (Coventry and Garrod, 2004, Gardenfors, 2014, Mani and Pustejovsky, 2012). The topological and geometrical principles of qualitative spatial reasoning have been formalized using the framework of the Region Connection Calculus (RCC; Cohn et al., 1997), complemented with convexity and distance and orientation primitives. In work in progress, we extend this framework to include functional relations (Coventry and Garrod, 2004, Vandeloise, 1991). The central functional relations are identified as locational control and support, as they enable us to characterize a wide range of further relations, including interlocking, containment, functional enclosure and telicity.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 29
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spatial prepositions, functional relations, and lexical specification
    Coventry, KR
    [J]. REPRESENTATION AND PROCESSING OF SPATIAL EXPRESSIONS, 1998, : 247 - 262
  • [32] Semantic Spatial Representation, an Experimental Proposal in the Framework of eParticipation
    Voghera, Angioletta
    Crivello, Rossella
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-PLANNING RESEARCH, 2015, 4 (04) : 18 - 35
  • [33] Towards an Extensible Framework for Understanding Spatial Narratives
    Ezeani, Ignatius
    Rayson, Paul
    Gregory, Ian
    Haris, Erum
    Cohn, Anthony
    Stell, John
    Cole, Tim
    Taylor, Joanna
    Bodenhamer, David
    Devadasan, Neil
    Steiner, Erik
    Frank, Zephyr
    Olson, Jackie
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH ACM SIGSPATIAL INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON GEOSPATIAL HUMANITIES, GEOHUMANITIES 2023, 2023, : 1 - 10
  • [34] Towards a spatial planning framework for climate adaptation
    Roggema, Rob
    Kabat, Pavel
    van den Dobbelsteen, Andy
    [J]. SMART AND SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 1 (01) : 29 - 58
  • [35] Towards a Social and Spatial Risk Perception Framework
    Rufat, Samuel
    [J]. CYBERGEO-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2015,
  • [36] Towards a situation awareness framework based on primitive relations
    Baumgartner, Norbert
    Retschitzegger, Werner
    [J]. 2007 INFORMATION DECISION AND CONTROL, 2007, : 346 - +
  • [37] Qualitative differences in the representation of spatial relations for different object classes
    Cooper, EE
    Brooks, BE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2004, 30 (02) : 243 - 256
  • [39] Object-based representation and classification of spatial structures and relations
    Le Ber, F
    Napoli, A
    [J]. 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 268 - 275
  • [40] Research on Representation Methods for Spatial Relations Based on Region Extension
    Li, Jia
    Yan, Lei
    Gan, Li
    Liu, Jianzhuang
    [J]. 2011 AASRI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INDUSTRY APPLICATION (AASRI-AIIA 2011), VOL 1, 2011, : 238 - 241