Multi-Tasking Policy Coordination and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China

被引:0
|
作者
Xie, Hongji [1 ]
Tian, Cunzhi [1 ]
Pang, Fangying [2 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Coll Econ, Guangzhou 510632, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Univ, Sch Business, Nanning 530004, Peoples R China
关键词
economic growth target pressure; environmental protection targets; pollution emission; environmental regulation; CAREER CONCERNS; GROWTH; DECENTRALIZATION; INSTITUTIONS; BUREAUCRATS; FEDERALISM; TURNOVER; LEADERS;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph20020923
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates how local governments coordinate the relationship between economic growth targets (EGT) and environmental protection targets (EPT) and the impact of such coordination on firm's environmental performance. Using the pollution emission data of China's industrial firms covering 2003 to 2013, we show that firms in the cities where officials are setting overweighted economic growth targets have more sulfur dioxide intensity, while the central government's hard constraints on EPT included in the official performance evaluation system could partially mitigate the environmental externality of the economic growth target. Further, we find that overweighted EGT significantly decreases firms' desulfurization facilities, capacity, and ratio, while the hard constraint of EPT helps mitigate this negative relationship. We also find that the positive relationship between overweight EGT and firm emissions is more pronounced in the dirty industry, while the hard constraint of EPT helps to mitigate this relationship. The above results help to identify an underlying mechanism of environmental regulation. Finally, we show that converting the hard constraints of environmental protection targets to self-constraint by local government officials could reverse the environmental externality of the economic growth target.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MULTI-TASKING, QUALITY AND PAY FOR PERFORMANCE
    Kaarboe, Oddvar
    Siciliani, Luigi
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2011, 20 (02) : 225 - 238
  • [2] PERFORMANCE METRICS FOR HYBRID MULTI-TASKING SYSTEMS
    Rupnow, Kyle
    Adriaens, Jacob
    Fu, Wenyin
    Compton, Katherine
    [J]. FPL: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FIELD PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, : 547 - 550
  • [3] Environmental Regulation and Fiscal Revenue Growth: Is It Win-Win or Win-Lose?-Evidence of a Multi-Tasking Performance Evaluation System in China
    Wang, Jia
    Yu, Linhui
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [4] Communications Challenges for Multi-Tasking Central Banks: Evidence, Implications
    Siklos, Pierre L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FINANCE, 2014, 17 (01) : 77 - 98
  • [5] How is multi-tasking different from increased difficulty?
    Howard, Zachary L.
    Evans, Nathan J.
    Innes, Reilly J.
    Brown, Scott D.
    Eidels, Ami
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2020, 27 (05) : 937 - 951
  • [6] Swarm Robotics: A Survey from a Multi-Tasking Perspective
    Debie, Essam
    Kasmarik, Kathryn
    Garratt, Matt
    [J]. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2024, 56 (02)
  • [7] Managerial multi-tasking, Team diversity, and mutual fund performance
    Chen, Jean Jinghan
    Xie, Li
    Zhou, Si
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 65
  • [8] Broad Performance Measurement Support for Asynchronous Multi-Tasking with APEX
    Huck, Kevin A.
    [J]. 2022 IEEE/ACM 7TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON EXTREME SCALE PROGRAMMING MODELS AND MIDDLEWARE (ESPM2), 2022, : 20 - 29
  • [9] Environmental policy uncertainty and corporate green innovation: evidence from China
    Huang, Jinrong
    Wang, Zongjun
    Jiang, Zhenyu
    Zhong, Qin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, : 1675 - 1696
  • [10] How is multi-tasking different from increased difficulty?
    Zachary L. Howard
    Nathan J. Evans
    Reilly J. Innes
    Scott D. Brown
    Ami Eidels
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2020, 27 : 937 - 951