The Organizational Psychology of Gig Work: An Integrative Conceptual Review

被引:52
|
作者
Cropanzano, Russell [1 ]
Keplinger, Ksenia [2 ]
Lambert, Brittany K. [3 ]
Caza, Brianna [4 ]
Ashford, Susan J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Leeds Sch Business, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Max Planck Inst Intelligent Syst, Org Leadership & Divers Res Grp, Heisenbergstr 3, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Bryan Sch Business & Econ, Greensboro, NC USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Ross Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
gig work; contracting; platform work; algorithmic management; sharing economy; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; NONSTANDARD EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS; TEMPORARY AGENCY WORKERS; CONTINGENT WORKERS; FREE-LANCE; ECONOMY WORKERS; CHANGING NATURE; LABOR-MARKET; DIGITAL PLATFORMS; ALTERNATIVE WORK;
D O I
10.1037/apl0001029
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article reviews the individual and organizational implications of gig work using the emerging psychological contract between gig workers and employing organizations as a lens. We first examine extant definitions of gig work and provide a conceptually clear definition. We then outline why both organizations and individuals may prefer gig work, offer an in-depth analysis of the ways in which the traditional psychological contract has been altered for both organizations and gig workers, and detail the impact of that new contract on gig workers. Specifically, organizations deconstruct jobs into standardized tasks and gig workers adapt by engaging in job crafting and work identity management. Second, organizational recruitment of gig workers alters the level and type of commitment gig workers feel toward an employing organization. Third, organizations use a variety of nontraditional practices to manage gig workers (e.g., including by digital algorithms) and gig workers adapt by balancing autonomy and dependence. Fourth, compensation tends to be project-based and typically lacks benefits, causing gig workers to learn to be a "jack-of-all-trades" and learn to deal with pay volatility. Fifth, organizational training of gig workers is limited, and they adapt by engaging in self-development. Sixth, gig workers develop alternative professional and social relationships to work in blended teams assembled by organizations and/or adapt to social isolation. Challenges associated with these practices and possible solutions are discussed, and we develop propositions for testing in future research. Finally, we highlight specific areas for further exploration in future research.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 519
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology
    Bal, P. Matthijs
    Doci, Edina
    Lub, Xander
    Van Rossenberg, Yvonne G. T.
    Nijs, Sanne
    Achnak, Safaa
    Briner, Rob B.
    Brookes, Andy
    Chudzikowski, Katharina
    De Cooman, Rein
    De Gieter, Sara
    De Jong, Jeroen
    De Jong, Simon B.
    Dorenbosch, Luc
    Galugahi, Motahareh Alsadat Ghoreishi
    Hack-Polay, Dieu
    Hofmans, Joeri
    Hornung, Severin
    Khuda, Kudrat
    Klamer, Renze
    Mendy, John
    Mol, Stefan T.
    Navarro, Jose
    Notelaers, Guy
    Ossenkop, Carolin
    Pickett, Jennifer
    Rollmann, Laura
    Sanderson, Zoe
    Sosnowska, Joanna
    Spanouli, Andromachi
    Vantilborgh, Tim
    Van Dijk, Hans
    Van Zelst, Marino
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 28 (03) : 289 - 299
  • [22] Work and Organizational Psychology in a dignified society
    Bal, P. Matthijs
    GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE, 2016, 29 (02): : 191 - 204
  • [23] Instruments of Work- and Organizational Psychology
    Burk, Christian Levin
    Amelang, Manfred
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ARBEITS-UND ORGANISATIONSPSYCHOLOGIE, 2015, 59 (03): : 155 - 157
  • [24] Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology
    Bal, P. Matthijs
    Doci, Edina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 27 (05) : 536 - 548
  • [25] Critical work and organizational psychology. Comments on Matthijs']js Bal: "Beyond neoliberalism in work and organizational psychology"
    Emans, Ben J. M.
    GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE, 2016, 29 (02): : 176 - 181
  • [26] On the Experience of Conducting a Systematic Review in Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology Yes, It Is Worthwhile
    Rojon, Celine
    McDowall, Almuth
    Saunders, Mark N. K.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 10 (03) : 133 - 138
  • [27] Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology: Some reflections on Gorriti's review
    Anderson, N
    Sinangil, HK
    Viswesvaran, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2004, 12 (04) : 375 - 377
  • [28] Work-Leisure Blending: An Integrative Conceptual Review and Framework to Guide Future Research
    Smith, Troy A.
    Butts, Marcus M.
    Courtright, Stephen H.
    Duerden, Mat D.
    Widmer, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 107 (04) : 560 - 580
  • [29] Conceptual Foreknowings: An Integrative Review of Hope
    Doe, Mi Jin
    NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2020, 33 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [30] Conceptual Foreknowings: An Integrative Review of Hope
    Doe, Mi Jin
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2020, 69 (03) : E96 - E96