Full-waveform LiDAR echo decomposition method based on deep learning and sparrow search algorithm

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Xiaobin [1 ]
Wang, Jiali
Wu, Jialin
Qu, Qinyang
Ran, Yingying
Tan, Zhiying
Luo, Minzhou
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Changzhou 213022, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lidar; Full-waveform decomposition; Sparrow search algorithm; LSTM; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.infrared.2023.104613
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
For the full-waveform LiDAR echo, the conventional decomposition method is to judge the number of waveform components in the echo through the IP (inflection point) method or RL (Richardson-Lucy) deconvolution method after filtering and obtain the initial estimation of their parameters, and then use the intelligent optimization algorithm to fit the waveform. However, this preprocessing method has poor accuracy in judging the echo components when the distance between targets is small. In this paper, a highly accurate decomposition method is proposed based on LSTM with SSA (Sparrow Search Algorithm). Firstly, the LSTM network trained by the simulation data sets under three kinds of background noise is used to judge the number of Gaussian components in the full-waveform LiDAR echo, and then SSA is used for waveform fitting. The accuracy rate of each LSTM network is more than 95%. This method is compared with IP, RL and MGD (multi-Gaussian decomposition) method. Within the accuracy of 0.1 m, the minimum decomposition distance of LiDAR echo is shorten from 0.7 m to 0.45 m compared with IP method and from 0.55 m to 0.45 m compared with RL and MGD method. The minimum ranging distance of LiDAR echo is shorten from 0.75 m to 0.65 m compared with IP and RL method and from 0.85 m to 0.65 m compared with MGD method. With proposed method, the accuracy of full-waveform LiDAR echo decomposition is improved and distance limit of decomposition is reduced.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Regularized elastic full-waveform inversion using deep learning
    Zhang, Zhen-Dong
    Alkhalifah, Tariq
    GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (05) : R741 - R751
  • [32] V-L decomposition of a novel full-waveform lidar system based on virtual instrument technique
    Xu Fan
    Wang Yuan-Qing
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2015, 24 (10)
  • [33] Full-waveform inversion with adversarial losses via deep learning
    Li, Hanyang
    Li, Xuegui
    Dong, Hongli
    Han, Fei
    Wang, Chuang
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 205
  • [34] The research of land covers classification based on waveform features correction of Full-waveform LiDAR
    Zhou, Mei
    Liu, Menghua
    Zhang, Zheng
    Ma, Lian
    Zhang, Huijing
    IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR REMOTE SENSING XXI, 2015, 9643
  • [35] The Method and Application of a Variational Modal Decomposition Based on Sparrow Search Algorithm
    Yang, Xuefeng
    Zhou, Xiaojun
    Fu, Yimeng
    Wan, Bowen
    Xiao, Peng
    2022 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION ENGINEERING, ICRAE, 2022, : 271 - 281
  • [36] WAVELET DOMAIN ACTIVE LEARNING FOR ROBUST CLASSIFICATION OF FULL-WAVEFORM LIDAR DATA
    Zhou, Xiong
    Prasad, Saurabh
    Crawford, Melba
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2014, : 3566 - 3569
  • [37] Deep Learning for Fusion of APEX Hyperspectral and Full-Waveform LiDAR Remote Sensing Data for Tree Species Mapping
    Liao, Wenzhi
    Van Coillie, Frieke
    Gao, Lianru
    Li, Liwei
    Zhang, Bing
    Chanussot, Jocelyn
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 68716 - 68729
  • [38] Deep-Learning-Based Low-Frequency Reconstruction in Full-Waveform Inversion
    Gu, Zhiyuan
    Chai, Xintao
    Yang, Taihui
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [39] End-to-End Full-Waveform Echo Decomposition Based on Self-Attention Classification and U-Net Decomposition
    Liu, Gangping
    Ke, Jun
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 15 : 7978 - 7987
  • [40] Full-Waveform LiDAR Point Clouds Classification Based on Wavelet Support Vector Machine and Ensemble Learning
    Lai, Xudong
    Yuan, Yifei
    Li, Yongxu
    Wang, Mingwei
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (14)